I’ll quote my husband on this one (he’s a Latin American lawyer) when he always says something like “one has the obligation to stand up against unjust laws.”
I don’t happen to feel that a law against the use of drugs is unjust. I don’t happen to believe that there exists a basic human right to use illegal drugs (or whatever) in public places (don’t know if I make a distinction between those places and private places, but for the sake of argument here, we ARE talking about a public venue, right? I’d have to think more about the other question of use in one’s home, I guess.)
Every society has different levels of tolerance about what constitutes public harm or public nuisance and what things are to be tolerated. Obviously Taiwan tolerates a lot of behaviors that are considered harmful or offensive in the West (whether through a lack of codification or enforcement). Conversely, the West probably tolerates things that Chinese think quite awful.
Human rights, to me, means that every human has the same rights. So saying that women can’t do X because they are female would be a human rights violation. In this case, every human in Taiwan is forbidden from using a certain group of drugs, regardless of gender or national origin. There is no discrimination. Whether or not hauling 300 people down to the station for a little piss party is practical or effective is another question; however, if there really is a 7% rate of positives (assuming accurate testing, no sale of samples, etc. etc. ad nauseum) that seems to me to be a fairly good grounds for going through the exercise from the point of view of the police. It’s annoying to those taken in, and I suppose to the boss of the club, and it’s probably not really practical nor speedy, but I don’t see where it’s a violation of people’s basic rights.
It’s kinda like when I was 19 and in Mainland China for the first time. We kept looking up and seeing that red flag and we’d always catch ourselves saying something like “well, it’s a free country” and then stopping short realizing that it WASN’T. We foreigners often assume that the basic assumptions and values of life and society should be the ones we are accustomed to or support, and that’s normal – everyone has his own culture. But we have to draw the line somewhere on which items we “have the right” to try to change and which we should just keep quiet about. I would protest, for example, the regulation a few years back that required me (the only foreign professor at a certain university) to take a syphilis test as a condition for employment, but merely because I was the only one required to do so. If everyone had to do it, I would grumble but take it, especially since I would know there was absolutely no danger I wouldn’t pass it.
As for the statement that “more Taiwanese use drugs than foreigners” – well, there are more Taiwanese to choose from. I wonder, however, what the percentages might show. I’m a pretty straight arrow, as you might guess, but from my chats with various much more “interesting” types, I get the impression that there is a pretty lively and fairly widespread drug culture among foreigners in Taiwan. I wonder how many are long-term residents and how many “just passing through”, but might it be safe to say that there is a substantial percentage of foreigners within the borders of Taiwan who are using?
And besides doing this kind of raid, what other ways could the police potentially go after the drug users? They aren’t busting into foreigners’ houses or the houses of Taiwanese users; they’re monitoring behavior at a public venue, albeit using rather “broad axe big knife” methods.
I guess it basically comes down to whether you feel drug use should be legal or illegal, tolerated or controlled. I assume that if the police were somehow using the same procedure to control some other kind of behavior that you personally found to be offensive and/or dangerous to the public well-being (and please let’s not get into a long discussion about whether or not a little recreational drug use is either of these!) you would also object to this kind of behavior on the part of the police? Or would it be OK if you felt that it was benefitting you and/or the public?
I agree that it’s difficult to sit back and see the authorities crack down on one particular thing when we all know there are so many other problems out there, including the corruption among the authorities themselves.
What do you think?? Seems like an interesting thread, anyway!!
Terry