Embrace do Islam, nice wording. Wrong, but nice. Could it just be that people on the left have an intellectual curiosity that helps them understand the world around them in a capacity other than “act/react”? Or, have been exposed to Islam enough to understand that while what you see on TV is true, there is way more to it than that. I know where you were going with that, and I also remember your comment about sweeping generalizations. Contradiction much? Christianity is being used to defend Roy Moore’s possible relations with minors. It has also been used to defend anti abortion laws in relation to rape victims. Maybe you accept that someone high in the gov possibly committed treason. Maybe embracing of multiculturalism, minority rights, same sex marriage, transgender rights, hell human rights is wrong and we should all accept ethnic nationalism. Maybe the liberating of Europe is wrong, or at least a waste of lives, since all those ideologies are becoming mainstream now.
Ah, Mr Dershowitz. One of OJ’s dream team. Nice to use an example of a man who at least twice, helped murderers go free. One of them double! A shining example you have chosen. I doubt chief little hands would OK a special investigation. The Fox and Henhouse analogy could be applied there.
I love how college campuses have become the foci of the FoS debate. As if that is the last refuge. The rights using the campus argument just reinforces the lefts claims that the rightists believe FoS means ANY speech ANY where and by ANY means of the choosing of the speaker. Not allowing certain speakers and certain speech in certain places is not censorship, or a violation of FoS, unless you define it as absolute. Read my discussion points above.
Your a mod. Would Milo, eat al be allowed to conduct one of his rather inflammatory speeches free and uncensored on Forumosa, keeping within the guidelines of the site?