Well, there’s no cops to call on them. And they’re not far removed from a crack house.
But they do have a lot of guns. Because of the gun control.
One way to deal with a crack house next door if the police aren’t helpful is to discreetly start a fire. By this analogy, there are plenty of groups in northern Mexico that we could fund as pet insurgencies. Kind of like Fast and Furious, but with a different purpose.
As for non-evil options, well… here’s the trouble with stupid people. There just aren’t any nice ways of dealing with them that actually work. They will destroy themselves; it’s just a question of whether you will be collateral damage. The best way to protect yourself is to choose the time of their demise.
The phrase “inverting the relationship” comes to mind. Socialism is not a partnership. It’s a dependency relationship. You don’t ask your rugrats to have your back.
I think a good argument could be made that it would be Americans paying for the wall through the use of such funds. American drug users, but still Americans.
And why is this even an issue? I thought it was all solved. Trump did say on the campaign trail “Mexico by way of theoretical gains we will make as a result of a restructured international trade deal.” I’m sure of it.
I wouldn´t care for them building an useless wall if it wasn´t for the butterflies and other fauna. They are the only ones who cannot figure a way around/over/under.
This is why I switched my position on trump, and this is why he will win 2020. Everyone who does not have left leaning ideology is far right, alt right, nazis, racist, sexist, etc.
some people make a distinction between building a border “wall” and a border “fence.” Indeed, analyzing 150-plus polls conducted over the past 13 years available in the iPoll Databank archive shows that 49 percent supported a border “fence” while 38 percent supported a border “wall”—an 11-point difference
