# 15 years ago, this site was a whole lot better.

**URL:** <https://tw.forumosa.com/t/15-years-ago-this-site-was-a-whole-lot-better/169283>\
**Category:** Feedback\
**Created:** [May 10, 2018, 12:46pm UTC](https://tw.forumosa.com/t/15-years-ago-this-site-was-a-whole-lot-better/169283 "2018-05-10T12:46:40Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 203

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![lostinasia](https://forumosa-12829.kxcdn.com/user_avatar/tw.forumosa.com/lostinasia/32/60703_2.png) [@lostinasia](https://tw.forumosa.com/u/lostinasia)\
**Post date:** [May 13, 2018, 1:54pm UTC](https://tw.forumosa.com/t/15-years-ago-this-site-was-a-whole-lot-better/169283/203 "2018-05-13T13:54:33Z")

</div>

> [@Dawud](#):
>
> Would “post volume” include the average length of posts as well as the number of them? I suspect that the move to smartphones has eroded post quality.

I dunno. Out of curiosity I scrolled way back through the Entertainment section. The [R.I.P. George Carlin](https://tw.forumosa.com/t/r-i-p-george-carlin/45324) thread from ten years ago is all very short posts, and you’d think something like that would prompt longer posts. If you compare [What (movies) are you watching? (2007)](https://tw.forumosa.com/t/what-movies-are-you-watching-2007/35465) with [What Movies Are You Watching —2018—](https://tw.forumosa.com/t/what-movies-are-you-watching-2018/166167), there don’t seem to be any obvious differences. Except that quote function in those older posts is f’ed up.

---

_[View the full topic](https://tw.forumosa.com/t/15-years-ago-this-site-was-a-whole-lot-better/169283)._
