What other real competitive advantages does Taiwan industry have? I’ve lived and/or worked here since the mid-90’s and haven’t seen any other significant industry-wide advantages.
Problem is if you try to compete on price some other countries without morals could out compete you. So if you want to be set apart then compete on value, not price.
If it’s because they’re horrible engineers who don’t think out of the box then change that.
Having seen the quality of higher education here I’ll just say… the value of these stem degrees is severely questionable. The expression “worth less than the paper they’re printed on” comes to mind…
In the engineering category, Tsinghua was ranked #1 for “total publications,” meaning its name was attached to more engineering papers than any other institution. But in “normalized citation impact”—a measure of citations per paper that accounts for differences in publication year and research area—it ranked a paltry #186. On another qualitative category, “percentage of total publications among the 10% most cited,” it came in at #167.
Tsinghua’s ”global research reputation,” a measure based on surveys of researchers in a particular field, was #16 in the world, a respectable but not outstanding number. MIT remained #1 in that category, followed by UC Berkeley, Stanford, and Caltech.
The same pattern applies to the other Chinese universities in the engineering top 10. Zhejiang University, #4 on the final list, was third in total publications but #110 in global research reputation. Harbin Institute of Technology, the seventh-best engineering school according to US News, was #2 in total citations and #4 in total publications, but #130 and #157 in reputation and publications among the 10% most cited, respectively.
The quantity explanation shows that these universities still have a long way to go to match the prestige of their counterparts in the US. The US News data show, for example, that Chinese universities attract far fewer staff from abroad than American ones.
Then were you referring to the wrong university in terms of your MIT claim? Because Tsinghua in China was the one that got all the press about “beating MIT”.
I’ll have to use interlibrary loan to get the book from the library again.
I should probably read it again anyway.
It has the story of the Acer founder who made a sales appointment to sell a microprocessor in the 80s. The guy thought he was talking about gardening equipment.
I’ve been to many a meeting with someone screeching about how we are just as good as Harvard, MIT, etc. What this does is preclude any open discussion of the problems here and meaningful ways to address them.
Of course there are exceptions.
But as to your example about “beating MIT” - especially if it’s from decades ago, it probably has little bearing on the state of universities here today.