[quote=“Toasty”]Any posts suggesting he isn’t totally blameless or may have actually done what he has been accused of doing are subject to immediate and harsh rebuttal and attack by none other than the friends and associates of the accused himself.[/quote] I’m neither a friend nor an associate of the accused.
[quote=“Toasty”]I understand this is a tough time for those close to the accused. . . .[/quote] I’m not close to the accused.
Here’s the “harsh rebuttal” that I wrote, my “attack”:
[quote=“On April 27, in this thread, I”]Just a couple of blasts from the past:
1.
Initial information:
Subsequent information:
[quote]The Filipina got sentenced to death.
If I read it correctly, David killed himself in the US in June.[/quote]
2.
Initial information:
Subsequent information:
Here’s an example of why I wrote my harsh attack, from the thread “Woman murdered in Kaohsiung,” also quoted above, a case in which the original suspect was finally released, apparently for lack of evidence:
I thought I saw the beginnings of a pattern; i.e., someone is suspected or accused, some people flip out and jump to conclusions, and then after a time, the situation sometimes turns out not to be like the conclusions they jumped to.
I’m not saying that this case will turn out that way, and I’m not saying it won’t. I just thought I’d point out what looked to me like the beginnings of a pattern.