A Personal Statement from Zain Dean

I hope the evidence is preserved.

[quote]No-one knows what caused the accident, if there was another party involved, or if it was entirely Mark’s fault. The police refused to let anyone see the video surveillance footage, and in the end it just disappeared. [/quote] Prayers for Mark Part 3

[quote]On the evening prior to his death, [Captain ] Yin had secretly recorded conversations with people involved in various ship deals, and Wang [Yin’s former secretary] later found the tape and handed it to investigating officials. The tape was subsequently demagnetized. . . . [/quote] taiwan-panorama.com/en/show_ … 20Security

Zain Dean wrote:

…as it was obvious that I would not be able to walk properly, let alone drive.

Further down in the statement:

Certainly I had not driven the car home so there didn’t seem to be any undue
reason to worry.

But then this?

I then got in the drivers seat (not even at this point noticing the damage on the
car) and drove the last couple of hundred meters home, parked the car and
somehow made it up to the house.

These statements are in conflict with each other. First, Zain states he’s not
able to walk properly, let alone drive, but then he hops in the driver seat and drives
home.

I think it would be interesting to bring Cho (the hotel driver) and Dean in to an
interrogation room with a translator and let them have a little chat while a
camera is rolling.

What a mess.

[quote=“Surf Punk”]Zain Dean wrote:

…as it was obvious that I would not be able to walk properly, let alone drive.

Further down in the statement:

Certainly I had not driven the car home so there didn’t seem to be any undue
reason to worry.

But then this?

I then got in the drivers seat (not even at this point noticing the damage on the
car) and drove the last couple of hundred meters home, parked the car and
somehow made it up to the house.

These statements are in conflict with each other. First, Zain states he’s not
able to walk properly, let alone drive, but then he hops in the driver seat and drives
home.

I think it would be interesting to bring Cho (the hotel driver) and Dean in to an
interrogation room with a translator and let them have a little chat while a
camera is rolling.

What a mess.[/quote]

Yeah that struck me too when I read the statement…its an obvious anomaly. In that situation if you were that drunk most people would simply have slept in the car.

Personally, I wondered why he didn’t just take a taxi home to begin with. :idunno: Hindsight?

I feel for the the guy. And really hope he didn’t do it.

[quote=“the bear”][quote=“Surf Punk”]Zain Dean wrote:

…as it was obvious that I would not be able to walk properly, let alone drive.

Further down in the statement:

Certainly I had not driven the car home so there didn’t seem to be any undue
reason to worry.

But then this?

I then got in the drivers seat (not even at this point noticing the damage on the
car) and drove the last couple of hundred meters home, parked the car and
somehow made it up to the house.

These statements are in conflict with each other. First, Zain states he’s not
able to walk properly, let alone drive, but then he hops in the driver seat and drives
home.

I think it would be interesting to bring Cho (the hotel driver) and Dean in to an
interrogation room with a translator and let them have a little chat while a
camera is rolling.

What a mess.[/quote]
its an obvious anomaly.[/quote]That and… I wonder how he manages to remember all of this so vividly since he has zero recollection of the car colliding with another vehicle within that time frame.

Good luck to him.

[quote=“Surf Punk”]These statements are in conflict with each other. First, Zain states he’s not able to walk properly, let alone drive, but then he hops in the driver seat and drives home.[/quote] I remember one day years ago when I was in the military, a friend of mine told me that the previous night I had been so drunk that I had gone to sleep on the parade grounds between the enlisted club and the barracks. He said that two guys in our unit had seen me there and had carried me to the barracks and up the stairs to the third floor, which was where my bunk was. Upon reaching the third floor, I had proceeded to walk to my bunk. My friend, who had been awake and on the third floor at the time, told me that he had had to prevent those two guys from whipping my a** (i.e., because they were angry that they had carried me all that way and then I had demonstrated that I could walk).

I didn’t remember any of it. It was like that sometimes when I was drunk: I didn’t remember much of anything. Other times when I was drunk, I remembered some things but not others. Still other times, I remembered pretty much everything. Sounds to me like Mr. Dean was drunk. That’s the only conclusion I can form from the statements you refer to.

[quote=“Surf Punk”]I think it would be interesting to bring Cho (the hotel driver) and Dean in to an interrogation room with a translator and let them have a little chat while a camera is rolling.[/quote] It will be good enough for me if Mr. Dean gets a fair trial.

[quote=“Charlie Jack”][quote=“Surf Punk”]These statements are in conflict with each other. First, Zain states he’s not able to walk properly, let alone drive, but then he hops in the driver seat and drives home.[/quote] I remember one day years ago when I was in the military, a friend of mine told me that the previous night I had been so drunk that I had gone to sleep on the parade grounds between the enlisted club and the barracks. He said that two guys in our unit had seen me there and had carried me to the barracks and up the stairs to the third floor, which was where my bunk was. Upon reaching the third floor, I had proceeded to walk to my bunk. My friend, who had been awake and on the third floor at the time, told me that he had had to prevent those two guys from whipping my a** (i.e., because they were angry that they had carried me all that way and then I had demonstrated that I could walk).

I didn’t remember any of it. It was like that sometimes when I was drunk: I didn’t remember much of anything. Other times when I was drunk, I remembered some things but not others. Still other times, I remembered pretty much everything. Sounds to me like Mr. Dean was drunk. That’s the only conclusion I can form from the statements you refer to.

I went on trial here before many years ago. I don’t want to say what it was for as that is not the point rather just to say that I did indeed get a very fair trial. The “judge” even chastised the cops for doing a bad job of the investigation. The case was dismissed immediatly and I walked out the court. I didn’t ask for compensation or anthing as just wanted to get out to the fresh air and sunlight. Anyways the “judge” was really very objective and yes I was treated very fairly indeed by the judge.

It probably doesn’t belong on this board, but a map would add a lot to the discussion. Where was the KTV? Where (approx) does Zain live? Where did the person get hit and die? Obviously if the person got hit 1/2 block from Zain’s house, it would be very different than if he got hit 3 blocks from the KTV. Where does the driver say he got out of the car, and where is that relative to the accident?

Just sayin’ …

I’m glad to hear that, and I mean it, I’m not being sarcastic. And I hope Mr. Dean also has a fair judge, and I also hope that if there is any evidence that can help Mr. Dean, it becomes available to him and his lawyer.

[quote=“HooknSinker”]It probably doesn’t belong on this board, but a map would add a lot to the discussion. Where was the KTV? Where (approx) does Zain live? Where did the person get hit and die? Obviously if the person got hit 1/2 block from Zain’s house, it would be very different than if he got hit 3 blocks from the KTV. Where does the driver say he got out of the car, and where is that relative to the accident?

Just sayin’ …[/quote]

[I’ve edited my post to try to make it less wordy and confusing.]

I dont know Chinese, but it looks as if this article says that the vehicle traveled from the corner of Songjiang Road and Siping Streets (Mr. Dean’s statement just mentions Songjiang Road) to somewhere on Section 4 of Chunghsiao East Road, and traveled a distance of 5.2 kilometers, before hitting the victim. If the news article is accurate, the route might look something like this.

But I noticed in this TVBS video (originally posted by Northcoast Surfer) that there’s a daytime scene in the video, at about 54 seconds, that shows a red “BEST” (日本BEST電器) sign. At 1:02 to 1:04 Northcoast Surfer’s video, there’s a picture of the wrecked motor scooter lying in the street. To the left of the motor scooter, there’s a large, light gray stone planter with two thin grooves in it and a shrub or small tree growing in it. Behind that planter, you can see another, similar planter. In this street view, you can see two planters of that same kind, in front of Starbucks and the BEST store on Chunghsiao East Road. At 1:01 to 1:02 on Northcoast Surfer’s TVBS YouTube video, you can see two buildings ahead and to the left that look very similar to two buildings ahead and to the left in this street view. So it looks as if the car hit the motor scooter somewhere around that BEST store, maybe more or less in front of Starbucks. Here’s a route view, with point “B” located between Starbucks and the BEST store.

Mr. Dean wrote in his post that the driver dropped him off at the corner of Songren and Xinyi Roads. So the route of the car from the corner of Siping and Songjiang to the corner of Songren and Xinyi might have looked something like this. Then again, that part of the car’s route, along with the car’s entire route, may very well have been different from what I’ve shown here.

It seems no further movement in the hit-and-run case.
His past record only made it a bit more complicated and look a bit worse in the trial.

Ohhhhh, copyright infringement. Shocking! :astonished:

That is a very serious matter in a country with such high standards of moral integrity as Taiwan. :no-no:

etaiwannews.com/Education/20 … 310485.htm

[quote]a Taiwan Solidarity Union (TSU) lawmaker yesterday accused National Taiwan University (NTU) of sheltering one of its associate professors, who was suspected of plagiarism in one of the articles she used for her promotion last year.

TSU Legislator Tseng Tsan-teng (曾燦燈) claimed that Chen Mei-li (陳美莉), a physical education professor at NTU, copied her piece from two articles written by her colleagues and made them into her own.[/quote]
taipeitimes.com/News/taiwan/ … 2003247299

taipeitimes.com/News/taiwan/ … 2003085576

Copyright infringements cases are very common in Taiwan, they often happen after business partners fall out and somebody wants to lay claim to the copyright of the original business. They are also used for intimidating competitors and bringing people to the negotiating table. The cases go on and on, conviction and appeal, conviction and appeal. Throw out the original suit and instigate a new one. The Taiwanese legal process is pretty harsh and can be influenced by who has the most money to hire the most lawyers and stick it out the longest! Almost every single Taiwanese business person I know has been involved in such lawsuits.

Look at the cases of CSB and his proxies. ALL of their sentences were reduced on appeal. It seems common to give a harsh sentence in the first round, then to go to appeal.

People change their Chinese names all the time, especially foreigners who might not have been happy with their original name. I changed mine three times. Taiwanese also change their names regularly. It means nothing…

Sure but it is still not good for the defendent to have a record of dishonesty against his name right? They are insinuating that he changed his name because of this copyright case. If true then that is fraud. Changing your name for the purposes of deception and in this case avoidence of trial is a serious charge. Just because many others supposedly do this all the time has no bearing on this case does it? I’m not sure whether or not this record can be used against the defendent in the drunk driving case. This is undoubtedly unwelcome news for Mr Zain Deen. It casts doubt on the credibility of his words against the word of the driver, the police and all the others involved in the case.

I’m not sure why “drunk drivers kill people all the time in Taiwan” or" copyright infirngement happens all the time in Taiwan" has any relevence? Perhaps locals get away with it more who knows but the fact remains that he will now likely be charged not only with copyright infringement, but also fraud, being a fugitive on the run, drink driving that lead to the death of a human being and the possible tampering of evidence.

I would not like to be in his shoes one bit and if I was him I’d try my hardest to get the hell out of here :2cents:

And if I felt guilty about the death of that person then I would send a large amount of money to the family from abroad. It is looking very grim indeed for Mr Deen.

If he is lucky they will find some dirt on the KTV driver too.

Perhaps time to start thinking about fishing boats! (joking of course :wink: )

My point about copyright infrigement is that it almost never a clear cut case. It’s also easy to catch somebody if you really want to, an unquoted phrase or non-attributed photo on a website. I don’t put too much stock in a lot of those cases. Having an outstanding warrant against you is not cool but I have seen some sh$$y cases involving trademarks and copyright, even if you got a conviction against you I think it might not be justice.

To my understanding, they do this mainly because of looking for the good fortune but it is only allowed to change names twice on the legal papers according to Article 7 under Name Act.

Name Act.
law.moj.gov.tw/Eng/LawClass/LawA … e=D0030011

The broader issue seems to be that a condition of his bail was he was not permitted to leave the country. Given that recently he was about to do just that, it would be important if that condition of bail was still in force.

Based on that statement, the key difference between the two statements is where exactly the change in drivers happened?

It does seem weird that the KTV guy would drive him only just around the corner, unless he was just doing it to make it look like he was doing what he was told? I think there would need to be physical evidence to prove conclusively one way or the other yes?

This is concerning the two-passport allegation:

[quote]As for allegations that Dean had two foreign passports and could flee the country using one of them, [Billy] Chen [陳達成, Mr. Dean’s attorney] showed a document issued by the British Trade and Cultural Office in Taipei showing that Dean is a British passport holder, valid until Sept. 16, 2012. Although Dean has had other passports, they have all expired and are no longer valid, Chen said.[/quote] taipeitimes.com/News/taiwan/arch … 2003475501

[quote=“Charlie Jack”]This is concerning the two-passport allegation:

This is starting to sound like the Simon Templer affair. Multiple passports, name changes, corrupt police, phantom drivers :ponder:

He should write a book when this is all over hell I’d buy it!

My belief is that if it is on the ARC, which is issued by the Police Department, it should be your only officially registered Chinese name. I doubt you can just switch to another name on another ID like the health insurance card.

When you want to use a Chinese name to do something important without using your English name, like say buy property, the name must be on your ARC. With all government computers connected nowadays, it should be easy to spot any wrong usage of names. But then, this is Taiwan, right? :ponder: