[quote=“leonard221”]Ducked, I believe thats also what they do in the exam. Every student will speak at same time, but into individual microphones and examiner will listen to each individually. I tried to explain this, but I don’t think the boss understands.
How do you usually teach gept speaking classes?[/quote]
Well, not to detract from your boss’s idiocy, but the same idiocy is pretty standard in the speaking section of many textbooks.
My favoured sophomore textbook (American English File 3) has been extensively messed-up and dumbed-down in its new edition, and now looks a lot more like my text-book-from-hell, American (Air)Headway, perhaps because the latter is apparently commercially successful.
There is a lot of idiocy about.
Some of this idiocy takes the form of “Listen again and make notes. Compare with a partner. Ask and answer the questions with a partner. What do you have in common.”
Seriously?
IF they did ANY of that (which is doubtful) in a standard 40-50 student class that’s going to produce an un-moniter-able and un-assessable cacophany such as you describe.
With this kind of thing the best I can do is to have a fixed seat-plan with column groups, and circulate doing a clipboard pantomime and interjecting occaisionally while they “practice”, but I’m usually only recording FU levels of non-participation for penalty points, if anything.
I then pick a pair of victims random-ishly in each group, and the group shares their score. IF I was together enough to ensure everyone gets picked as a victim over the semester I could give indiv scores as well, but I havn’t been so far.
I don’t teach GEPT, but I think this is a general problem.
Since they lied to me both about limiting class size and selecting for ability for the forthcoming IELTS course (which were my pre-conditions for running it) , I’ll probably have to use the Babel-Room indiv microphone technique for the speaking test, since an IELTS stylee indiv. interview isn’t logistically feasable.