Water was running out before the war
If they bomb a few more girls schools, there won’t be as much demand for water.
There is a cease fire and Iran is waiting 30 days, and the US paused the clock on the 60 day countdown, and also boats and stuff are being attacked
If Taco the Clown follows thru on his threat to commit war crimes in Iran even he knows war crimes will be first on the list of articles of impeachment against him after Democrats sweep to victory in the midterms.
Thank you for emphasizing my point. 
What democrats? Americans are leaving their party droves and the gerrymandering is rectifying their cheating attempts.
another impeachment? Well right now democrats are trying to get Trump assassinated so I guess that’s a plan B?
Secretary of State (maybe President 2028) Rubio talks about how the Iranians have left the civilians in the gulf left for dead…again just to show the horrors of the same Regime that kills tens of thousands of its own people.
I first mentioned what they are doing to the Sahel in 2022 here.
These have covered it for years:
Migration from that area sees people heading both to Europe and southern Africa.
The intercontinental corporate fascists want the resources. Tony Blair wrote about the wonderful opportunities the area represents with regard to natural resources around 2017.
Funny how the Islamic nut jobs appeared out of no-where in that region, too.
I am old enough to remember defeating Iran it was about ‘regime change’ and ‘freedom for women’.
And the ‘tens of thousands’ of killed (I wonder who pulled those numbers out of the hat?) were backed by the security services of your zio pedo bloc, which knew they would not succeed. Rubio and any other gimps could care less about any of those that died. They were useful idiots.
Well I’m sorry but it is. Even Muslims don’t want an Islamist state and I bet the women had a real chance to vote on things they’d want it gone:
even the guardian says around 20,000 so sorry…your claim is far fetched at this point unless you can prove it.
You’re free to think that the admin are useful idiots but seeing how Irans response to having been attacked was to target civilians and neutral ships/countries (including thailands ship and Azerbaijan…Azerbaijan!! It’s like nowhere near the fighting)
And that zio pedo block has its Abraham accords signed by Morocco and the UAE (who are strengthening their ties with Israel…)
Just clearing the air here lol
But I understand the frustration. Soon enough Iranian troops will be out of cash, the people will be out of water and the oil capacities will cease to function and the Iranians will either come to a deal or they’ll be in such a mess that it won’t matter anymore lol
In a 1996 60 Minutes interview, then-US Ambassador to the UN Madeleine Albright stated that the deaths of a reported 500,000 Iraqi children due to US-led sanctions were “a very hard choice, but the price, we think, the price is worth it”. She later called this comment the “stupidest thing” she ever said.
How many civilians do you think will die if Taco the Clown bombs Iran’s power grid and water supplies back to the Stone Age?
That will be up to the Iranian people and the IRGC but let’s not deal in hypotheticals.
I mean…if we are gonna deal in hypotheticals…how many lives has the President saved by preventing Iran from having and then using a nuke?
The same number President Bush did by preventing Iraq from having its nukes.
I thought we weren’t gonna deal in hypotheticals.
Wanna deal in real? How many lives could have been saved had the US intervened in the Sudetenland when Hitler wanted them? Millions? Tens of millions?
Just imagine if FDR had gone to Berlin with Chaberlain and told Mr Hitler to fuck off or the might of the United States will fall on Germany so hard it would send him straight to the Fourth Reich
Then we’d hear complaint tile “Free Sudetenland” as the German populace there were in fact oppressed by their Czech owners and about poor Germany because they just lost a war that was no fault of their own etc etc.
Okay now I’m dealing in Hypotheticals! 
or is it satire?
“They lied. They said there were weapons of mass destruction, there were none. And they knew there were none. There were no weapons of mass destruction," — Donald Trump, March 19, 2016
You’re right they gave us an incorrect Cassius belli or false flag or whatever.
In reality Saddam was doing two things we didn’t like:
1 - removing the petrodollar to replace it with the euro
2 - harboring and training terrorist agents who were against the US.
Those two things ain’t happening anymore.
To say that the Iraq situation is like the Iran situation would be like saying the South Korea situation is similar to that of Taiwan.
But don’t you worry - Iran will not be an Iraq. If it is I’ll buy you a beer anywhere you want.
And I get it. As an American I don’t want Iran to be another Iraq I’m right there with you. And I did vote for Obama fyi…and one of the reasons was because of Iraq
Okay thank you for linking that. Let’s look at it in its entirety shall we?
It starts with this:
IRAN
Strategic Overview
Tehran will try to leverage its robust missile capability and expanded nuclear program, and its diplomatic outreach
And:
We continue to assess Iran is not building a nuclear weapon and that Khamenei has not reauthorized the nuclear
weapons program he suspended in 2003, though pressure has probably built on him to do so. In the past year,
there has been an erosion of a decades-long taboo on discussing nuclear weapons in public that has
emboldened nuclear weapons advocates within Iran’s decisionmaking apparatus. Khamenei remains the
final decisionmaker over Iran’s nuclear program, to include any decision to develop nuclear weapons.
Iran very likely aims to continue R&D of chemical and biological agents for offensive purposes. Iranian military
scientists have researched chemicals that have a wide range of sedation, dissociation, and amnestic
incapacitating effects, and can also be lethal.—
also if what you say is true then why doesn’t Iran just say it won’t make a nuclear weapon and hand over the uranium it has?------
We also need to look at the bigger picture. America is reshaping the Middle East and Iran with its Islamist proxies is in the way.
Trump Has made it clear that an Iran open to trade and fangless is what we want.
Hopefully they’ll play ball before it’s too late.
What good would it do?
- Iran Hands Over Stockpile of Enriched Uranium to Russia, Dec. 28, 2015
A Russian ship left Iran on Monday carrying almost all of Iran’s stockpile of low-enriched uranium, fulfilling a major step in the nuclear deal struck last summer and, for the first time in nearly a decade, apparently leaving Iran with too little fuel to manufacture a nuclear weapon.
The shipment was announced by Secretary of State John Kerry and confirmed by a spokesman for Russia’s civilian nuclear company, Rosatom. Mr. Kerry called it “one of the most significant steps Iran has taken toward fulfilling its commitment,” and American officials say that it may be only weeks before the deal reached in July takes effect. . . .
Mr. Kerry, in a statement, said the ship, which Russian officials said was the Mikhail Dudin, carried 25,000 pounds of nuclear material. That included, Mr. Kerry said, the fuel that was closest to bomb-grade quality: It had been enriched to 20 percent purity. Iranian officials said that fuel was for a specialty reactor to make medical isotopes, but it was considered a threat because it would require relatively little further enrichment to produce a weapon.
Ridding Iran of the material was a major goal of the multistep agreement to unravel what the United States and international regulators called a military endeavor in the guise of a civilian nuclear program.
Iran is still disassembling centrifuges, which enrich uranium, and disabling a plutonium reactor, among other steps that are required under the nuclear agreement struck in July.
Iran is permitted to hold 300 kilograms, or about 660 pounds, of low-enriched uranium under the deal. But that is not enough to produce a single weapon.
I get your point - can Iran even trust the US? Especially since the US seems to change direction every four years.
That being said Iran would be showing a gesture of good faith to an administration that did offer to help Iran build civilian nuclear sites.
Iran would also be in a position again to generate much needed revenue and maybe even access a banking system to help Iran rebuild. Heck I think the US would be willing to Help them rebuild from a financial standpoint.
According to This non partisan article it is clear that Iran has well above what was agreed to and wanted to weaponize it.
Here is one quote:
“In hindsight, there should have been more alarm about Iran’s resumption of 20 percent enriched uranium production in 2021, given the projected lack of need for any newly produced 20 percent enriched uranium. But one factor complicating seeing the actual situation was the secrecy surrounding the ghost inventory.”
Or are you saying that Iran is NOT a threat and that their usage of Uranium is purely for civilian purposes? Are you saying that Iran is justified in building a self defense nuclear arsenal?