I think I have to agree with Jimi about the regulation.
Let’s face it, if the government decided to tighten up then the hoops to jump through would be more numerous and probably more absurd, but it’s unlikely that the quality of teaching would improve. And actually, for all my bitching about local teachers recently, I believe that the ‘system’ itself is not all that bad.
The problem is the parents, more precisely the problem is that some people can’t accept that their precious offspring are not really cut out to be doctors or lawyers. Everybody is so focused on pushing little precious to the top of the heap that they don’t notice that all of little precious’ friends are also scrabbling to get there, with the result that the whole heap moves slightly but the same kids are at the top. Little precious is now forced to work fourteen hours a day just to be mediocre.
If you want to be a great teacher who really makes a difference to people’s lives then you have to educate the parents.
If, on the other hand, you just want to get rich, then your problem is that the market is largely only concerned with price, which puts you in a race to the bottom. And if your understanding of education is different from that of the customers, the parents decribed above, then they won’t buy from you. So you have to cater for their idiocy, while competing on price with everyone else. This is a recipe for disaster whether your focus is education or money.
If you want to make more money then you have to persuade people to buy something different, something unique that has more value, but that requires you to educate the customer.
Whether you want more money, better educational outcomes, or both, you have to educate the customer about what’s best before you try and actually teach them English. My previous comment is simply a truth that any good salesperson will attest to: if you don’t care about and respect your customers then they will sense that and your ability to make the sale will be reduced.
Having a licensed operation might be a first step in raising your credibility rating, which is the starting point for making a sale regardless of whether you want to get them into the classroom for your own good or for theirs. On the other hand, it might also categorise you as a service provider rather than a high-value expert. This is especially true if the regulatory framework issuing your license is poorly-informed or poorly understood by the customers.
I do in-company classes for MNC’s and, currently, one government department. In the past I have also been paid by the MoE to teach classes at various places, plus I’ve taught classes at three different universities and a couple of government senior high schools this year alone. Rates vary somewhat, and everyone has their own interpretation of the tax regulations and legalities. But I’m not running a legal school and have never had a criminal background check. So I guess that means Maoman has to call the cops and send them around to all those big-name institutions.
I’d really like to try and get groups of students together for classes of my own, but need a venue. In fact, you need a venue for customers to come in and get educated before they buy anything. Some kind of a school really becomes a pre-requisite for this kind of thing, legal or otherwise. (Anyone know of affordable classrooms for rent?)
I was interested in knowing more about Tom’s place and other people’s experiences for this reason. Jimi’s alternative approach is also relevant, even though I don’t really agree with him.
I guess my question is “is taking over or opening a school the logical progression from freelancing?”
It also leads to a seperate issue of how effective the regulation is, how relevant it is, and how much we are justified in dodging it.