Are butt cracks the new bosum?

boob · June 24, 2004, 5:52am

It seems some of the ladies in Taipei are no longer satisfied wth a display of their bosoms hence the lower, lower…lower waist lines. Yeaterday I saw a girl displaying a good two or three inches of butt crack. Fortunately it was an extremely attractive butt crack. However I must admit I prefer the front to the back view on most occasions. Frightening to think where this trend might be heading…

OldToeSave · June 24, 2004, 6:10am

This guy’s ink’s soooo still wet. Welcome to Taipei…ogle on.

Could that be a new tourism slogan?

Omniloquacious · June 24, 2004, 6:18am

I can’t say anything against it at all. What could possibly be offensive or objectionable about the flaunting of any kind of female cleavage? If her proportions or other attributes are not to my taste, I can look away and be none the worse for whatever glimpse I may have had of the cleft on display. If she happens to be a lithe little hottie, I can only be grateful to her for giving me something so lovely to feast my eyes on.

Not frightening at all, no matter where it may head. If they start to go butt-naked in public, I’ll be the first to stand up and applaud.

Tigerman · June 24, 2004, 6:24am

I can’t say anything against it at all. What could possibly be offensive or objectionable about the flaunting of any kind of female cleavage? If her proportions or other attributes are not to my taste, I can look away and be none the worse for whatever glimpse I may have had of the cleft on display. If she happens to be a lithe little hottie, I can only be grateful to her for giving me something so lovely to feast my eyes on.

Not frightening at all, no matter where it may head. If they start to go butt-naked in public, I’ll be the first to stand up and applaud.[/quote]

I completely agree with Omni. I love looking at girls’ behinds, and if they want to show more, I’m willing to oblige and look.

Incidentally, I saw a documentary once on Discovery, I believe, that theorized that a woman’s rear cleavage was made by nature to resemble in a way her front cleavage… as a way of attracting men to the proper (important) locale for reproductive purposes.

Spack · June 24, 2004, 6:31am

Is XXX the new YYY?
Later that evening, I wondered to myself, are we all turning into a character off Sex in the City? Are our lives slowly turning into a pale imitation of a TV series? In the grammar of love, aren’t we all just a little bit dyslexic?

What do you reckon? Could I be a writer on the show?

OldToeSave · June 24, 2004, 7:10am

So nature is some kinda Hanna-Barberra meets Tim Robbins cartoonist…

Some slobbering neanderthals, too caught up in catching a buzz from sipping at the primordial swamp, getting all marsh mellow as it were…these country-kin of fred and barney, were so long at the still, that procreation became akin to stuffin’ their marsh-mellow’d l’il fellars into a piggybank. And so that great cartoonist, nature by name, sculpted betty and wilma into a more erm, bubbly jane and judy jetson?

All’s I can say is Thanks Nature. And…Thanks Discovery Channel. And…Thanks Tigerman. And…Thanks to all women everywhere who continue to assist us daily by showing us the way to San Jose…

As someone else in another thread said

[quote=“I paraphrase what ??? quite hilariously yet also hauntingly accurately”]

Top Ten Things Men Know About Women

Ummm
Ummm[/quote]

So again…Thanks Nature.

TNT · June 24, 2004, 7:39am

[quote=“tigerman”]

Incidentally, I saw a documentary once on Discovery, I believe, that theorized that a woman’s rear cleavage was made by nature to resemble in a way her front cleavage… as a way of attracting men to the proper (important) locale for reproductive purposes.[/quote]

And I also thought we looked at the ass so as to determine if she has good child bearing hips

Spack · June 24, 2004, 8:24am

Why has no one mentioned ‘spandex lip cleavage’ yet?
Oh, I just did.

mungacious · June 24, 2004, 9:02am

[quote=“Spack”]Why has no one mentioned ‘spandex lip cleavage’ yet?
Oh, I just did.[/quote]

dude, its called ‘CAMEL TOE’

Scuba · June 24, 2004, 9:16am

This guy’s ink’s soooo still wet. Welcome to Taipei…ogle on.

Could that be a new tourism slogan?[/quote]

At last I understand the Taiwan tourism slogan, it refers to butt size.

If you like a wide butt then go to europe or the US.
If you like a " Narrow one" then welcome to Taiwan.

Thankyou for sparking this valuable insight.

boob · June 24, 2004, 9:46am

I am just curious about whether cracking a fat and presenting it prominently might not be the polite thing to when a young lady flashes either bit of cleavage. Any thoughts?

enzo · June 24, 2004, 10:05am

One of the best things the summer of 2004 will be remembered for in Taiwan, is that finally, local ladies are responding to the hot weather and showing off bare arms, shoulders, backs, and cleavages
The clothes they’re wearing this year are much more revealing than before.

I say better late than never. European women have been wearing this kind of stuff for 20-30 years now.
Up next: topless and naturist beaches, anyone?

Spack · June 24, 2004, 10:09am

QuietMountain · June 24, 2004, 2:44pm

[quote=“tigerman”]I completely agree with Omni. I love looking at girls’ behinds, and if they want to show more, I’m willing to oblige and look.

Incidentally, I saw a documentary once on Discovery, I believe, that theorized that a woman’s rear cleavage was made by nature to resemble in a way her front cleavage… as a way of attracting men to the proper (important) locale for reproductive purposes.[/quote]

Ok… I know I’m gay, so I may not understand all things related to a woman’s anatomy, but I’m confused by this “butt cleavage” attracting men to the proper local for reproductive purposes thing. I didn’t think women could get pregnant from anal sex? Did I miss something in health class?:s

And, even if this is the case, then why do men also have butt cleavage. (And, don’t any of you hetero males tell me they don’t. I’ve seen it.) Since men definitely can not bear children, even if anal sex was capable of doing so (which, again, I was under the impression is impossible), this “favor” of nature would not be necessary in men. Am I wrong?

As for the new trend in low-rise jeans making women’s ass cracks available for viewing to one and all, I for one find it rather disgusting. But, that’s just me, I know.

bob · June 24, 2004, 2:55pm

Everytime I see a butt crack I get an urge to spit in it. Wonder where that comes from. Tiger?

sandman · June 24, 2004, 2:57pm

[quote]I’m confused by this “butt cleavage” attracting men to the proper local for reproductive purposes thing. I didn’t think women could get pregnant from anal sex? Did I miss something in health class?
[/quote]
I suppose you must have. Humans are (I think) the only creatures that “do it” face to face, and that’s only because of relatively recent church teachings – don’t want any good, god-fearing Christians carrying on like the beasts in the fields now, do we?
The pastors could teach this to their flocks but they couldn’t stamp out evolution and the power of the subconscious.
Why d’you think it’s called the missionary position?
As for why men have bum-cheeks? It’s obvious – what the hell would they sit upon if they had no situpons?

sandman · June 24, 2004, 2:59pm

How weird – just today I saw a prize specimen on a scooter next to me and wished I’d had a straw and a mouthful of icy-cold cherry-flavoured slurpy to dribble down there.
Maybe I should seek professional help.

bob · June 24, 2004, 3:11pm

Wow. I actually get the straw and freezy cold slurpy impulse too. I just said spit because I thought it sounded more raunchy and because I was too lazy to type it the first time. Incredible. (not kidding by the way)

mod_lang · June 24, 2004, 3:45pm

The theory originated in Desmond Morris’ The Naked Ape. And red lips are a visual mimicry of the vagina.

straitstimes.asia1.com.sg/column … 6-,00.html

wsu.edu:8080/~taflinge/biosex2.html

Typical land mammalian anatomical structure enhances rather than impedes reproduction.(8) For example, let’s examine a typical female land mammal. She walks on all fours, her rear legs at right angles to her spine. Her vagina is under her tail and flush to the surface.

What these factors mean is significant. First, the male mounts from the rear for sexual intercourse. He approaches from the rear, places his weight on her back, and engages. The technical term for this is lordosis. (Beach, 1968; Morgan, 1972)

The position of her limbs makes it possible for her to support his weight during intercourse without a lot of effort. Her limbs don’t impede intercourse. In addition, if she is not ready she can simply walk away.

The effort she must expend in intercourse is also reduced (remember how important her effort is biologically). She need only stand still and let him do the work.

Of course, animals don’t engage in mating all the time. So for mammals, the vagina, a very delicate organ, is well protected by the tail or by the hip and leg structure. Nonetheless, during mating it is easily accessible.

Some of you may be thinking, “What has this to do with humans? Humans aren’t built anything at all like deer or cows or horses. What about primates, which humans are like?”

Very well, what are primates like? Well, very much like deer or cows or horses. They primarily walk on all fours, males mount from the rear, her limbs can easily take his weight during intercourse and have great lateral flexibility. Her vagina is near the tail bone and on the surface, easily accessible to the male when she presents her posterior. The position of her limbs and a callosity on her rump also protect it when she sits. Thus, technique hasn’t changed from deer to chimp.(9)

It is when we begin to examine human sexual anatomy that problems become apparent. The human body seems designed to impede rather than enhance intercourse.

Most of the differences between non-human and human anatomy that are important to this discussion are in the female structure. First, and most obvious, is the human upright stance. Only humans normally walk on their hind legs rather than on all fours and have the hip and leg structures that make it easy and natural. For males, this causes little in the way of problems since he’s convex rather than concave.

For females, however, it is a major problem. As her legs rotated about her hips, moving from a right angle to in-line with her spine, her vaginal opening traveled farther and farther forward. Also, instead of being surface mounted, like other land mammals, her vagina retreated into her body with a covering of extra flesh. (Hamburg, 1974)

There were not only changes in the position of her vagina. Her legs changed radically as well from those of all other primates. First, her legs got closer and closer together. Second, her hip joints reformed to reduce lateral flexibility and stabilize her upright posture. Finally, instead of the spindly, bowed leg structure that all other primates had and have, her legs turned into long, thick, heavy, muscular columns.

A last major change in her anatomy was her buttocks. Unlike any other creature on earth, including the primates, humans have big buttocks, sometimes so large they form a shelf in the back. And it is almost axiomatic that no matter the race or culture, the female will have a bigger behind than the male.

At this point you may very well be asking yourself, “So what? So women have large buttocks – so do men. So women walk upright – so do men. What’s the big deal?”

It’s a good question. The answer is that as the female primate changed into the female human, her new body made sex difficult. Her vagina was now not easily accessible but difficult to get to. It moved far forward, got a covering layer of flesh, and became hidden between two heavy columns of bone and muscle.

“Nonsense!” you reply. “Where do all these babies come from, if sex is impossible? Men and women do get together, you know.”

Indeed, they do, but not the way almost any other primate or land mammal does. Remember, all these changes in female anatomy occurred before humans became human. Let’s examine what may have happened long ago and far away.

Ms. Primate, decked out in her new body, bounds up to a likely looking male and presents her posterior – after all, land mammals mate from the rear. He, of course, responds. However, there is a new and frustrating development – he can’t reach. Equipped as he is with a primate penis, which is small,(10) her vagina is too far forward, her legs too close together, and her buttocks hold him too far away.

“Then the human race died out,” you sneer sarcastically, knowing such is not the case. Obviously the human race did not die out. To avoid this fate, the male primate had two choices: evolve physically to compensate for her changes, or change his technique. In fact, the male did both.

First, the proto-human male evolved an over-sized penis, the largest in the primate world, and one of the largest in comparison to body size in nature.(11) However, since this evolution in male structure was in response to changes in the female, he was always a little behind (no pun intended).

It was his solution to this problem that has had a great influence on human male and female attitudes towards sex – he changed his technique.

QuietMountain · June 24, 2004, 4:55pm

[quote=“sandman”][quote]I’m confused by this “butt cleavage” attracting men to the proper local for reproductive purposes thing. I didn’t think women could get pregnant from anal sex? Did I miss something in health class?
[/quote]
I suppose you must have. Humans are (I think) the only creatures that “do it” face to face, and that’s only because of relatively recent church teachings – don’t want any good, god-fearing Christians carrying on like the beasts in the fields now, do we?
The pastors could teach this to their flocks but they couldn’t stamp out evolution and the power of the subconscious.
Why d’you think it’s called the missionary position?
As for why men have bum-cheeks? It’s obvious – what the hell would they sit upon if they had no situpons?[/quote]

It seemed to me, from the original statement, you were referring to anal sex. However, I see you meant some form of vaginal sex. How exactly you do it from behind, I don’t know… and, frankly, don’t care to know.

Not within my realm of interest, at all. So, I’ll just shut up now and go onto some other thread…