Article: China's extramilitary approach to displacing the US

The Jamestown Foundation has a new piece out on China’s drive to displace the United States as a regional and eventual world hegemon:

[ul]As the United States hedges against a potential military confrontation with the People’s Republic of China (PRC), Beijing has opted to circumvent Washington’s preparations by adopting a grand strategy that utilizes “extra-military instruments” to gradually diminish the preponderant influence of the United States. These instruments --economic aid, cultural contributions, legal compulsion and diplomatic coercion – transcend, but certainly do not exclude the use of military force. Indeed, the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) is, borrowing from the PLA’s descriptions of itself, “prepared but preferably unused” (bei er bu yong), and serves as the backbone of China’s extra-military instruments. While these instruments are primarily “soft,” their effects can often be “hard,” as illustrated by Beijing’s aggressive international strangulation of Taiwan’s “lebensraum” [1]. In constructing its new grand strategy, China appears to have infused elements of realpolitik into a number of its traditional objectives, with its priorities as follows: (1) maintain domestic stability at all cost; (2) cooperate with, rather than contradict the United States; (3) assist the growth and development of China’s neighbors, assure them of their security and win their friendship (fulin mulin anlin); (4) reunify Taiwan without war, reserving the use of force as a last resort; (5) cultivate Europe and Russia to serve as counterweights to the United States; and (6) fill in the post-Cold War power vacuums in Latin America and Africa.[/ul]

It’s a good thing our President is focused on the really important stuff, like pointless invasions of prostrate powers …future historians will look at the Bush Presidency and wonder how any set of educated human beings could be so relentlessly stupid and destructive across such a vast array of policy issues. Clearly the worst administration in the history of the United States.

:bravo:

Am looking forward to the possibility of Adolf Bush’s impeachment.

BroonAid

Sure about that? Or is Bush the only one on TV now? :laughing:

I guess it really depends who you ask, right? I mean Rolling Stone said Bush was the worst, but who TF are they? Some bozos constantly trying to tell me who to like to listen to. HOw about polling the American voters? Gosh, them and their 23…22…21 second attention span. I’m amazed most American even know Bush is still President.

I think this guy has a good take:

thornwalker.com/ditch/lights94.htm

He thinks Clinton and Bush both came along too late to muck up the country.

A quote from the last page:[quote]
I’m glad I waited until Presidents Day before finishing my examination of the worst, most destructive, most tyrannical U.S. presidents. An annual poll taken on the occasion of this high holy day of statism reveals that “Americans,” whoever they are these days, find these men to be the four greatest presidents:

  1. Ronald Reagan
  2. John F. Kennedy
  3. Abraham Lincoln
  4. Bill Clinton

CNN noted that Reagan displaces Kennedy, who was top man on last year’s list.

There’s something there to horrify everyone — left, right, center, or libertarian — who still owns and operates a live brain. For one thing, it’s yet another painful illustration of our neighbors’ inability to grasp any history that precedes their own adult lifetime.

Admirers of ***** will reel in dismay at their hero’s inability to nail down the number-one slot in the mass mind for all time. But it’s a self-inflicted wound. If most Americans are present-centered, and feel that they and their country are outside history, ***** had much to do with making that come to pass.[/quote]

I removed the name of the number one worst President, because it’s not fun to not to. Read the article. Worth it!

[quote]
future historians will look at the Bush Presidency and wonder how any set of educated human beings could be so relentlessly stupid and destructive across such a vast array of policy issues.[/quote]

“Educated human beings?” bwahahahahaha

Smart monkeys, maybe. But still monkeys.

A related article on Chinas new “openness” (I am using this term very very loosely)

[quote][b]China Offers Glimpse of Rationale Behind Its Military Policies
By Edward Cody, Washington Post Foreign Service
Saturday, December 30, 2006; A17

BEIJING, Dec. 29 – China warned Friday that the military landscape in northeast Asia is getting “more complicated and serious” because of North Korea’s nuclear weapons program and tighter defense cooperation between Japan and the United States.

The Chinese views on regional security, articulated in a government white paper on national defense, provided a rare glimpse into the strategic assessments that underlie decisions and priorities of the secretive Chinese military and the Communist Party’s policymaking Central Military Commission.

In part, the paper was designed as a response to repeated complaints from the Bush administration that China has not explained the rationale behind its long-term military improvement program. China’s announced military budget has risen about 10 percent a year recently, reaching $35.4 billion in 2006, and Pentagon specialists estimate that also counting equipment expenditures would more than double it.

Along with Taiwan’s pursuit of independence, the government pointed out as particular security challenges North Korea’s missile tests last summer and its maiden nuclear test in October, which undermined Chinese-led diplomatic efforts to create a nuclear-free Korean Peninsula. The most recent round of nuclear negotiations took place last week and ended in stalemate, creating doubts about the utility of continuing the three-year-old six-nation talks.

In listing Chinese concerns, the white paper also cited a U.S.-Japanese effort to build a regional missile defense shield based on U.S. ships equipped with the Aegis radar system and a U.S.-Japanese missile now being developed. The joint defense system, portrayed as protection against a North Korean attack, has been criticized by Chinese officials and commentators because it also could blunt China’s missile threat in the event of U.S.-Chinese hostilities over Taiwan.

Chinese officials have expressed concern that Taiwan could eventually be integrated into the U.S.-Japanese system, providing a counterweight to China’s increasing missile threat against the self-ruled island. That fear was not explicitly conveyed in the white paper, but Japan’s growing willingness to assert itself militarily was cited as a strategic concern for military planners in Beijing.

“America and Japan are strengthening their military alliance in pursuit of operational integration, and Japan seeks to modify its peace constitution and exercise collective self-defense,” the paper said. “North Korea launched missiles and had a nuclear test. The situation in the Korean Peninsula and northeast Asia is getting more and more complicated and serious.”

The paper said China’s military improvements are part of the country’s overall modernization and economic expansion. The effort will continue apace, it added, seeking to “lay a solid foundation” by 2010, make “major progress” by 2020 and “reach the strategic goal of building informationized armed forces and being capable of winning informationized wars by the mid-21st century.”

Moving from infantry to high-tech naval and aerial warfare has been a major goal of China’s military modernization. It has entailed the shedding of thousands of untrained foot soldiers and a concerted effort to replace them with trained technicians able to function in the world of computerized weaponry.

The white paper said, for instance, that the army’s relative strength in the Chinese military has dropped by 1.5 percent, while that of the navy, air force and Second Artillery Force – China’s missile and nuclear corps – rose by 3.8 percent. Overall military strength has fallen by 1.7 million troops since 1985 and is estimated to stand at 2.3 million, still the world’s largest force.

The People’s Liberation Army “has made new progress toward the goal of being proper in size, optimal in structure, streamlined in organization, swift and flexible in command and powerful in fighting capacity,” the paper boasted.

But it provided no details on the new ships, warplanes, missiles, submarines and computer systems that, according to U.S. officials, have increased China’s lethal power in the region and made any confrontation over Taiwan a riskier proposition for the United States than it would have been a decade ago.

As it has before, the government warned that any step by Taiwan’s President Chen Shui-bian to move toward formal independence by changing the territory’s constitution would be a “grave threat” to peace and stability across the Taiwan Strait, suggesting it could trigger military intervention. President Hu Jintao, who as head of the Central Military Commission is commander in chief of the armed forces, has told visitors he has no plans to attack Taiwan but would have to act if the island took a decisive step toward formal independence.
Washington Post[/quote]
Interesting, but nothing really new. End of year wrap-up type 'news.