Beijing starts gating, locking migrant villages

[quote]BEIJING – The government calls it “sealed management.” China’s capital has started gating and locking some of its lower-income neighborhoods overnight, with police or security checking identification papers around the clock, in a throwback to an older style of control.

It’s Beijing’s latest effort to reduce rising crime often blamed on the millions of rural Chinese migrating to cities for work. The capital’s Communist Party secretary wants the approach promoted citywide. But some state media and experts say the move not only looks bad but imposes another layer of control on the already stigmatized, vulnerable migrants.

So far, gates have sealed off 16 villages in the sprawling southern suburbs, where migrants are attracted to cheaper rents and in some villages outnumber permanent residents 10 to one.

“In some ways, this is like the conflict between Americans and illegal immigrants in the States. The local residents feel threatened by the influx of migrants,” Huang Youqin, an associate professor of geography at the University at Albany in New York who has studied gating and political control in China, said in an e-mail. “The risk is that the government can control people’s private life if it wants to.”

The gated villages are the latest indignity for China’s migrant workers, who already face limited access to schooling and government services and are routinely blamed by city folk for rising crime. Used to the hardship of the farm and the lack of privilege, migrants seem to be taking the new controls in their stride.

Jia Yangui said he accepts the new system as a trade-off for escaping farm work in the northern province of Shanxi. He arrived in Beijing less than two months ago and lives with a relative in one of the gated villages, Dashengzhuang. He sells oily pancakes just inside one of the gates.

“Anyway, it’s not as strict as before, when we migrants would be detained on the way to the toilet,” said Jia’s relative, a middle-aged woman who gave her family name as Zheng.

“Sealed management” looks like this: Gates are placed at the street and alley entrances to the villages, which are collections of walled compounds sprinkled with shops and outdoor vendors. The gates are locked between 11 p.m. and 6 a.m., except for one main entrance manned by security guards or police, there to check identification papers. Security guards roam the villages by day.

“Closing up the village benefits everyone,” read one banner which was put up when the first, permanent gated village was introduced in April.

But some Chinese question whether problems arising from growing gap between the country’s rich and poor can be fixed with locks and surveillance cameras.

“It’s a ridiculous idea!” said Li Wenhua, who does private welfare work with migrant workers in Beijing. “This is definitely not a good long-term strategy. The government should dig up the in-depth causes of crime and improve basic public services such as education and health care to these people.”

Crime has been rising steadily over the past two decades, as China moved from state planning to free markets and Chinese once locked into set jobs began moving around the country for work. Violent crime in China jumped 10 percent last year, with 5.3 million reported cases of homicide, robbery, and rape, the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences reported in February.

“Sealed management” was born in the village of Laosanyu during the Beijing Olympics in 2008, when the government was eager to control its migrant population. The village used it again during the sensitive 60th anniversary of Communist China last year. Officials then reported the idea to township officials, who decided to make the practice permanent this year.

“Eighty percent of the permanent residents applauded the practice,” said Guo Ruifeng, deputy director of Laosanyu’s village committee. He didn’t say how many migrants approved, though they outnumber the locals by 7,000 to 700.

“Anyway, they should understand that it is all for their safety,” he said. Guards only check papers if they see anything suspicious, he said.

Gating has been an easy and effective way to control population throughout Chinese history, said Huang, the geography professor. In past centuries, some walled cities would impose curfews and close their gates overnight. In the first decades of communist rule, the desire for top-down organization and control showed in work-unit compounds, usually guarded and enclosed.

The new gated villages in Beijing are very different.

“To put it crudely, gated communities in the city are a way for the upper middle-class and urban rich to keep out trespassers, whereas gated villages represent a way for the state to ‘keep in’ or contain the problem of ‘migrant workers’ who live in these villages,” Pow Choon-Pieu, an assistant professor of geography at the National University of Singapore who has studied the issue, said in an e-mail.
news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100714/ap_ … VDoHVzfNdF
[/quote]

I don’t know how I feel about migrant workers locked up in villages. It sounds too much like slavery to me. Has anyone heard anything more about this?

What do you expect? China has moved a long way from communism to a fascist oligarchy, and is well on the way to recreating their 5,000 year old feudal reality

You are fascinating, please tell me more.

This is typical of China, though. They have for centuries locked the city gates at night, according to the article cited. During the heyday of communism they’d lock people in their villages. Figuratively as well - one reason it is an issue is that there is no freedom of movement in China - you couldn’t just move to another city to work, you needed permission from your superiors, which was not easily gotten without a hefty bribe. In 1994 and 1995, when I lived in China, all campuses I saw were walled, and the gates were locked so the students couldn’t get in or out.
For the last 10 years or so these restrictions on where people can live have stopped working, and migrants from the countryside have flooded into the big cities. They still can’t legally live there, though, so now the authorities are locking them up again.

I thought they already did this.

[quote=“bababa”]This is typical of China, though. They have for centuries locked the city gates at night, according to the article cited. During the heyday of communism they’d lock people in their villages. Figuratively as well - one reason it is an issue is that there is no freedom of movement in China - you couldn’t just move to another city to work, you needed permission from your superiors, which was not easily gotten without a hefty bribe. In 1994 and 1995, when I lived in China, all campuses I saw were walled, and the gates were locked so the students couldn’t get in or out.
For the last 10 years or so these restrictions on where people can live have stopped working, and migrants from the countryside have flooded into the big cities. They still can’t legally live there, though, so now the authorities are locking them up again.[/quote]

HOLY S**T

We are just not told about this in the West.

Don’t you have some sort of ARC, Chuanzo? You have to keep an updated address on your ARC for a reason, you know. Granted, you aren’t locked in your building at night, but you have to register where you live, and have to change it if you move, so that “they” can keep track of you.

I’m okay with that. The point is I have freedom to get up and move without telling anybody about it first.

I’m amazed that the Chinese physically locked people in cities as recently as the 90’s and I didn’t know about it.

I too am amazed that you did not know stuff. :stuck_out_tongue:

It’s pretty un-pc to post any negative news about China in Canada. We’re really nervous to portray any non-white culture in a negative light. If we can’t easily switch the conversation to “yeah, but the Americans are worse” we’d rather not know about it.

It’s got nothing to do with their colour or race, mate. The fact is that the government and the enforced way of life there are feudal anachronisms. Oh, and the CCP are a bunch of self-serving pricks. Simple. What’s un-PC about that (and since when does PC worry you)?

If only the Americans would do the same for some of their own communities, it would be a simple and effective solution to the problem of crime.

Simple and effective solutions are however, un-American. It makes much more sense for everyone else to be forced to live in gated communities instead… Or better yet, use public funds to move the people who live in aforementioned communities elsewhere via section 8 so that they can spread the dysfunction to everyone else. It’s not as if the problems were caused by people, it must have been all that bad feng shui that was resulting in in crime. Your honor, the positioning of the street signs made me do it!

They’ve done this even in hong kong for years. They lock up chenking mansions every night and check citizens going in and out. Is there a difference? I know its still china.

[quote=“cmdjing”]If only the Americans would do the same for some of their own communities, it would be a simple and effective solution to the problem of crime.

Simple and effective solutions are however, un-American. It makes much more sense for everyone else to be forced to live in gated communities instead… Or better yet, use public funds to move the people who live in aforementioned communities elsewhere via section 8 so that they can spread the dysfunction to everyone else. It’s not as if the problems were caused by people, it must have been all that bad feng shui that was resulting in in crime. Your honor, the positioning of the street signs made me do it![/quote]

Of course, you wouldn’t feel the same if it were you they wanted to lock up. Implied in your commentary is the assumption that you are one of the superior individuals that deserves freedom more than your fellow human. I see.