[quote=“Jack Burton”] what do you think of the quantity and quality of the dictionary? I’ve heard some can be quite poor.
overall, would you recommend an electronic dictionary, or a trad dictionary? my friend also said there’s a trad dictionary out there for foreigners who can look up words based on a break down of any component of a character ie u don’t have to use a radical, u can just recognise a part of a word, like the “roof” bit to find a path to your word.[/quote]
First, the electronics I’ve seen are limited in content, but so are most pocket dictionaries. Both are basically useful for carrying along; and the on-screen character recognition (you write the character on the screen and it recognizes it, so you don’t have to know the dict. index key) is great. So get one, but back it up with a larger desk dictionary like the DeFrancis ABC Comprehensive, which is an excellent, highly recommended book. And then later, when you need other, specialized dictionaries, you can add them. Or if you’re doing translation, or are a Virgo like me, you can add other dictionaries to your collection later, such as 遠東漢英大字詞辭典 Far East Chinese-English Dictionary, 1992. The Far East Book Co., Ltd., Taipei. ISBN 957-612-228-7; 漢英辭典(修訂版) A Chinese-English Dictionary (Revised Edition) Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press, Beijing 1995 ISBN 7-5600-0739-2. Basically, no one dictionary is the final, authoritative solution. Each has its flaws, and you have to use them with discretion, and pencil in your own margin notes. Having a native speaker as conversation partner – esp. one who majored in Chinese at a top university – is the best complement to good dictionaries.
As for using the non-index-key part of the word, I believe your friend is referring to Harbaugh, Rick (1998). Chinese Characters: a Genealogy and Dictionary 中文字譜 - 漢英字元字典, Zhongwen.com publ., ISBN 0-9660750-0-5. A very handy little book using innovative genealogical charts (family trees of characters), facilitating searches for characters by graphic component, whether phonetic or semantic. Not recommended for etymology info, as etymologies are traditional, chiefly Shuōw