Business as usual as Obama continues the agenda

[cake]

[quote=“plasmatron”][quote=“cake”]
He’ll tax the air we breath and blame it on climate change…

They want centralization. They want to control everything we do.
It’s Neo National Socialism. The Stasi would be proud at the way the US is heading.

That’s why these politicians leaders are calling for global this and global that. Nationalise the banks, nationalize the currencies then head to a global currency…[/quote]

Granted not even Obama can/will wash off all of the blood that’s on the hands of the US, but if you really believe the statements above, you’ve got to lay off the GOP’s crackpot kkkool-aid because it’s making you come across as a little ignorant, or at least confused…[/quote]

Even the BBC are smelling the salt:

“The US is embracing a form of state control and intervention that looks remarkably Chinese”
Robert Peston, BBC Business Editor

bbc.co.uk/blogs/thereporters … na_an.html

[anon38216271]

[quote=“Dr. McCoy”]http://www.obamaimpeachment.org/
I haven’t got any free money yet.[/quote]

i see Tainan Cowboy has still been busy in his spare time…

[anon38216271]

@Mother Theresa

[quote=“Namahottie”]I do not believe that Obama is a bit more liberal. Not one bit. I think he will appear to be liberal for his first 9 months (that’s guess) of taking office, but he is very much middle of the road type of policy person. I think liberals will be disappointed by his first year.

Isn’t “middle of the road” usually the best policy if one requires cooperation from others in order to get things done?

Likewise, I don’t know why the term “compromise” is so often used perjoratively. During business negotiations, compromise is often essential to reach the best solution and achieve the greatest good for ones own side (while incidentally also achieving good for the other side). The alternative is head-butting, stubborn, steadfast stalemate, waste of time and resources and lack of progress. Seems logical the same should apply in politics.[/quote]

I wasn’t thinking that middle of the road, but rather the kind that’s more ambiguous. Right now, we don’t need that. We need a bit of black and white
type of leadership, IMO.

[snafu]

@Namahottie

[quote=“Mother Theresa”][quote=“Namahottie”]I do not believe that Obama is a bit more liberal. Not one bit. I think he will appear to be liberal for his first 9 months (that’s guess) of taking office, but he is very much middle of the road type of policy person. I think liberals will be disappointed by his first year.

Isn’t “middle of the road” usually the best policy if one requires cooperation from others in order to get things done?

Likewise, I don’t know why the term “compromise” is so often used perjoratively. During business negotiations, compromise is often essential to reach the best solution and achieve the greatest good for ones own side (while incidentally also achieving good for the other side). The alternative is head-butting, stubborn, steadfast stalemate, waste of time and resources and lack of progress. Seems logical the same should apply in politics.[/quote]

I wasn’t thinking that middle of the road, but rather the kind that’s more ambiguous. Right now, we don’t need that. We need a bit of black and white
type of leadership, IMO.[/quote]

And here I thought we were behind all that “black and white” issues. Republicans are waiting for him to do something that’s just a tad bit to the left and they can pounce on the elections in 2 years to get some type of control back. I don’t think Obama is going to do anything but deal with the economy/Iraq in the first 2 years. Gun control, abortion, gay rights, … anything that’s controversial he is going to ignore in the first 2-4 years. I am hoping he tackles universal health care but I don’t think he can afford it.