[quote=“jaame”]Power is torque multiplied by engine revs divided by 5252 right?[/quote]Yes, 5252 is the constant based on Watt’s observations of one horsepower as 150 pounds, 220 feet in one minute.
[quote]Power and torque are always equal at 5252 revs.[/quote]Yep. See the graph below:
Note that below 5252 rpm any engine’s torque number will always be higher than its horsepower number, and above 5252 rpm any engine’s horsepower number will always be higher than its torque number. At 5252 rpm the horsepower and torque numbers will be exactly the same.
[quote]Torque is the twisting force at the crank and power is how much of this force can be achieved in a given time.[/quote]Pretty much, and the force achieved is calculated with the velocity or distance traveled in a given time.
I’m not sure Watt used a donkey, though. [quote]What type of horse was a brewery horse? In England at the time a work horse most likely would have been one of the three British “heavy breeds” – the Suffolk punch, the shire horse, and the Clydesdale. The Clydesdale is said to have originated in the latter 1700s, perhaps too late to be a common work horse at the time Watt was doing his horsepower calculations. So it seems likely the horse in question was either a Suffolk punch or a shire horse. Link [/quote]
Maybe Suffolk or shire horses are donkeys? I’ll google it later. I have things to do right about now.
[quote=“Dogma”]
Wow well done, you have so undermined yourself that I need say nothing further.[/quote]Man, you have SERIOUS difficulties dealing with people who disagree with you without being so fucking condescending. :s
marboulette