Recently I’ve encountered some problems with our company’s spam filter being a little overzealous, blocking emails from my personal account and from two different lawyers whose emails made it through in the past with no difficulty. But apparently they’ve tightened the screws on our protection.
While it sucks that they blocked emails from those three sources, that’s trivial: I contacted the IT guys and they’ve now whitelisted those three addresses. My serious concern (which the IT guys unfortunately don’t seem to understand) is that I may have discovered just the tip of the iceberg. It’s possible, that unbeknownst to all of us, the system is blocking countless legitimate, possibly critical, emails to thousands of employees in the company. I know one colleague and I are both having legit emails blocked, so it seems logical that everyone is.
Here’s the system they use:
clearswift.com/products/msw/ … logic.aspx
Anyone familiar with that? Is it a relatively good product?
Here’s a truly wacky thing about its recent performance. After I complained to the IT guys, they gave me a readout showing a 97.448% chance that the latest blocked message was spam. There was no mention of sexual organs, viagra or mortgages in the email. It looks totally unspam-like to me.
And here, stranger yet, are the key words that the filter based its decision on: nearby, impending, occasion, newly, him, had, chance, opened, and a couple of others. Each of those words had a rating of over 90%. Huh? Why the heck would a bayesian filter have such common words programmed in as potential spam indicators?