[quote=“Stian”][quote=“Ducked”]The Mobil blurb uses a phrase similar to “quality base stock”, which suggests its not synthetic to me.
[/quote]
I was thought that synthetic oil is a oil where the molecule has been modified into a composition that don’t exists in the base.
All oils bases are heavy fractions that can’t be distilled at atmospheric pressure without going to harmful temperatures.
They are distilled under vacuum to lower the boiling point. I think the Germans made synthetic fuels from coal when there oil supplies where running short in 1945.
I think I had a hangower the day mobile came to my class to teatch us about there products and it’s been 10 year so I might be slightly wrong.
I quite sure the mobile1 2-t I bought was marked synthetic.[/quote]
I think “synthetic” means it been synthesised, ie. built up from simple molecules like methane or ethylene, so that the final product is fully defined. Made rather than found.
This would exclude chemically modified base stocks, which are still complex mixtures, though the best of them may have similar performance to a “real” synthetic.
I think this technical definition generally matches the legal definition, which determines whether the description “synthetic” can be used in advertising.
The exception is the United States, where its my understanding that, following a “the law is an ass” test case, there is no legal definition. In the US, “synthetic” just means “quality”, which, strictly speaking, doesn’t mean anything, though it may be that the required performance level is legally defined (?) In practice, the term seems to be often applied to good quality modified base stocks.
Since we are not in the US, that may be why none of the packages I saw mentioned “synthetic”. Because they weren’t.
This guy, who’s been quoted in oil discussions on here before, and gives a good summary of oil classification, mentions a Mobil lawsuit re the changing US definition of “synthetic”, so I guess thats it.
http://www.calsci.com/motorcycleinfo/Oils1.html
“In the late 1990s, Castrol started selling an oil made from Group III base oil and called it SynTec Full Synthetic. Mobil sued Castrol, asserting that this oil was not synthetic, but simply a highly refined petroleum oil, and therefore it was false advertising to call it synthetic. In 1999, Mobil lost their lawsuit. It was decided that the word “synthetic” was a marketing term and referred to properties, not to production methods or ingredients. Castrol continues to make SynTec out of Group III base oils, that is highly purified mineral oil with most all of the cockroach bits removed.”