No one told us before we became parents how hard the basic daily tasks of parenting would be, nor did anyone tell us how hard it would be for us to develop the knowledge to become competent parents.
I’ve sort of realized parenting is this major knowledge challenge unlike the other rote and repetitive tasks we have done our
whole lives. In parenting, you have no formal training or experience, probably. So you have to survey the available knowledge, which might be books or could be advice from family and friends. Then you have to apply it to your own kids on the fly.
There’s your mother, mother-in-law, or other experienced family member who has never read a book but sometimes has some good old fashioned common sense ideas based on her experience, and you know she has the child’s best interests at heart. A lot of her advice may run contrary to what you read in books.
As for books, parenting authors belong to schools of thought. Knowing that is half the battle.
Even prior to birth, you have to figure out what the schools of thought are. The Democrats would be the Lamaze method of natural birth at a hospital. The Republicans would be modern medicine ob/gyn who eventually does a C-section. The Green party would be natural birth at home, using only a midwife, using a birthing ball, a tub, with your kids and neighbors watching, while someone videotapes, while you eat ice cream and get a Shiatsu massage.
For feeding, the Greens are the attachment theory school (Dr. Sears) who want breast feeding for as long as the child will take it (multiple years). The Democrats want breast feeding for at least 6 months. The Republicans think formula is fine.
When it comes to feeding or sleep scheduling, the Democrats are the attachment theory school (Dr. Sears) who want feeding or sleeping on demand so she doesn’t cry, as crying is bad for kids in their eyes. The Republicans are the old schoolers who are ok with some crying, like crying it out for a baby to learn how to sleep on its own (Dr. Weissbluth). Then on the far right are the Tea Partyers, which are ok with a lot of crying in order to get the baby onto a schedule. I think BabyWise falls into that category. And many of these are the probably the more systematic, well researched authors. Then there are plenty of shoddily written books or web articles written solely for commercial value where the content is of dubious added value.
For constipation/incontinence, the Democrats are the naturopaths who think it’s related to diet or think it can be solved with supplements. The Republicans are the pediatric GI doctors who prescribe Miralax (a laxative) for years on end. The radical independent party is both conservative in its old school methods and liberal at the same time by taking a psychological approach and believes in suppositories/enemas for psych retraining.
Every major parenting issue has multiple authors taking positions and usually criticizing or ignoring the other side. As a parent, you should get used to hearing people criticize doctors and you will soon take it as the conventional wisdom that doctors are only good for certain things and don’t really know anything about real parenting solutions. So you can’t even rely on a doctor for good advice on many daily parenting task. They could be Luke Skywalker or Darth Vader, depending on if you’re a Democrat or a Republican. And as hard as you try to do the “right thing”, it’s very hard to determine what the right thing is. No one can seem to agree on what that is.
Finally, as hard as you try, parenting by its nature is not scientifically rigorous. There is no double blind, randomized, control group. For many, parenting isn’t even empirical in any sense (e.g. you might not have a baseline of prior experience for comparison because you didn’t have younger kids around you growing up). In terms of the knowledge that we bring to bear, parenting for most of us is essentially speculative and based on fragmented book knowledge (how many books can a frazzled parent really read?), or based on word of mouth anecdotes from friends and family at best.
Whatever you do sends you down a particular irreversible path. You cannot repeat the experiment. Your sample size is 1. This is a live experiment that you have to make work in real time.
EOR (end of rant).