I see nothing about “banning” anything. I see the most harmful books being identified. Let’s look more closely…
According to the conservative website Human Events, the ten most harmful books of the 19th and 20th century are:
- The Communist Manifesto
Did not communism kill the greatest number of people in the 20th century and lead to untold misery and economic dislocation?
- Mein Kampf
Naziism and Hitler did not destroy Europe and lead to great misery?
- Quotations from Chairman Mao
Chinese communism was an exercise in humanity? freedom?
- The Kinsey Report
Disagree
- Democracy and Education
Do not know this book
- Das Kapital
See above.
- The Feminine Mystique
Are women happier today as “liberated” career women or do many now regret not trying to balance and have families? This is ditto for men incidentally but there was never the same level of hostility to family life as exhibited by Betty Friedan and her ilk. No?
- The Course of Positive Philosophy
???
- Beyond Good and Evil
Might determines morality. What I feel (if I think that I am one of the exceptional) determines my own reality, my own reality? no wonder Nietzche went insane.
- General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money
Unfamiliar will look into it.
Honorable Mentions include:
- The Population Bomb by Paul Ehrlich
So we are now facing underpopulation and graying populations. NOT overpopulation as our most serious problem. So? Who was right?
- On Liberty by John Stuart Mill
Is this a joke? THIS book?
- Beyond Freedom and Dignity by B.F. Skinner
- Reflections on Violence by Georges Sorel
???
- The Origin of Species by Charles Darwin
Disagree
- Madness and Civilization by Michel Foucault
Yes, we have found that insane people and sane people are really the same. It just involves different levels of power determining who really is insane and who is not?
- Coming of Age in Samoa by Margaret Mead
Most of this research was long ago disproved and the “free love” that it preached has been responsible for a great deal of promiscuous sex that has not led to happiness but AIDS, broken families and lonely people at age 50.
- Unsafe at Any Speed by Ralph Nader (???)
Depends on if you view the present crop of trial lawyers and their voracious appetite for law suits as being a serious problem for legitimate business, ultimately the consumer and how much this costs economic growth.
- Second Sex by Simone de Beauvoir
Again, why is it that at age 50 so many would be man-hating feminists like Maureen Down suddenly are desperate for marriage and family life?
- Wretched of the Earth by Frantz Fanon
Don’t know it.
- Introduction to Psychoanalysis by Sigmund Freud
Much of Freudianism has also been discredited to my understanding though I am not an expert.
- The Greening of America by Charles Reich
Again, dependsd on the extent. When man is viewed as a germ worth destroying to preserve the formerly “pristine” Mother Earth then I think that the priorities have been skewed.
- Descent of Man by Charles Darwin
Disagree.
Is a comment even necessary?
I think that it is. More than half of these books were seriously flawed not just in terms of morality but in terms of research and conclusions thereof. I think that a much wider debate needs to be held on many of these books and their reprecussions rather than openly dismissing the argument that the conservative group is trying to make. AND from my understanding these books have been labeled the most harmful to the Conservative Christian cause. Did anyone say they should be banned? AND if you are a Christian Conservative then you may value family, free markets and Creationism so these books, yes, would be a problem with your world view.
I have no issue with that. I would have an issue if this group was in fact calling for them to be banned. I want people to read these books, understand them, see how they have failed and come to their senses. The more they read, the more they cannot help but conclude that these ideas and their proponents were deeply flawed.