I think we have established, considering this a stunt, no matter if it were on the left or right, two weeks out from an election would have the consideration that it might just be a dirty october suprise trick as a possibility is common sense.
The fact you label it insane right wing theory, I might suggest you might reflect if indeed it might be your position which is extreme and what is normal or common sense to everyone one else seems extreme loony right to you.
Might explain why you think everyone on here is some far right wing nut, despite taking tests that prove overwhelmingly most people on here are liberal.
Perhaps perople are what they say they are, take tests that prove they are what they say, yet you percieve them as extreme far right, simply because you are extreme far left.
However, in general it can be useful to demonize Democrats because theyâre Democrats - thatâs how low the Democrat party has sunk since 2016. Not because of âmah Trump,â though.
I was going to say itâs not that I donât feel welcome, but after reading Mickâs post I donât really feel welcome. Iâd just like to say, I didnât call anybody far right. I said a lot of the talking points were far right. Visit /r/the_donald and /r/conspiracy and tell me Iâm wrong there. But, whatever, âExtreme Far Leftâ. Super liberal, or something.
Tracking. Itâs not rocket science. Stop reaching so hard.
Seems to me that Mick is one of the most civil posters on this forum, so I donât see why his posts would make you feel unwelcome. I think everyone on here is arguing in good faith, so thereâs no need to bow out just because of differences of opinion and viewpoint.
Itâs a question of perception, no one was calling you anything, but you have on many occasions labeled this forum and itâs members in a particular way.
Itâs not about you even. More generally to a pessimist a realist will look like an optimist. Although they might like to think of themselves as a realist.
Itâs a question of perception. Of course you are very welcome here, but if you start labeling this and the people posting as Alt-right or far right wingers, please be kind enough to expect people to question if you are correctly and accurately representing these people. Because remember, no one challenged you in the slightest and now that I push back at your characterization, which I feel quite offended by, you claim to be the victim. No. Absolutely not.
But I will repeat, please keep posting, your views are more than welcome.
I havenât. I said the arguments were far right. I did say there was an insane right wing echo chamber, I guess, but thatâs what you get when a large number of people are espousing right wing arguments.
Youâre the only one whoâs labelled anybody anything.
At the risk of sounding snarky, reading comprehension my friend. The operative word is âwasâ. The only way to address your constant claims that this forum and its posters are extreme right wingers, when in fact looking at the fun test that most people took which shows nearly everyone has strong liberal tendencies was to suggest perhaps you would like to be centrist, which is ok, you are in fact far to the left and see not only those to the right as extreme right, but centrists too and perhaps if I may say, you even see those on the left as extreme far right.
Just something to think about, in fact I will bow out at this point.
Hard to take any of that seriously in a thread where youâre pushing a false flag narrative. You can claim up and down that youâre as liberal as they come; youâre still pushing a right-wing agenda there.
I think we have established, considering this a stunt, no matter if it were on the left or right, two weeks out from an election would have the consideration that it might just be a dirty october suprise trick as a possibility is common sense.
I think you have established nothing. Your argument is (a) there are some bombs (b) sometimes there are dirty tricks in politics (c) it is two weeks from an election (d) therefore this is a âdirty october suprise trickâ (sic) i.e. a+b+c=d
Ok, I know youâre going to quibble that you only said âa possibilityâ, but this is merely a causal fallacy unless you can provide some real evidence. You have established nothing.
Note the postage stamps donât appear to have been stamped, nor apparently is it enough to post such a thing.
Apparently they all arrived at the same time (and who would have all those addresses anyway?). Sorosâ son has an essay ready for print almost immediately.
Someoneâs calmly taking multiple pictures of an apparent explosive. All duds; if youâre going to throw away your life for this why do such a poor job?
The work of either an extremely autistic magapede or someone whoâs going to commit suicide via two gunshots to the back of the head shortly.
Well the question is always how much of a possibility something is.
If we want evidence, evidence is something which would substantiate a claim, not prove it. If you can prove something then there are no longer possibilities.
Evidence is the foundation on which a claim or theory can be built, in this case the claim is the Democrats have resorted to ever increasing dirty tricks. I could provide examples of such behavior but already know, sometimes these right wing conspiracy theories like Bill Clinton being a rapist or at the very least a serial sexual predator can take decades for some on the left to accept.
So, I am under no illusions I am changing anyoneâs mind today. Just chiming in and having a little fun, as long as no one is hurt, which so far is the case, thankfully, no need for everyone to be overly serious.
