Which law?
I had the same question. As far as I could tell from some quick online searching, it seems the retaliation-related laws in Taiwan are related to workplace employment situations. Was this a working relationship, where you were essentially fired from a job for some kind of whistle-blowing action?
Civil code article 184.
I found this: https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1118&context=alr
Article 184 of the Civil Code serves as the cornerstone of tort
law in Taiwan. It states that “a person who, intentionally or
negligently, has wrongfully damaged the rights of another is bound
to compensate him for any injury arising therefrom. The same rule
shall be applied when the injury is done intentionally in a manner
against the rules of morals. A person, who violates a statutory
provision enacted for the protection of others and therefore prejudice
to others, is bound to compensate for the injury, except no negligence
in his act can be proved.”63 Before the 2020 Civil Decision, judicial
interpretations typically limit the application of this rule to
individuals only.64
In the 2020 Civil Decision, the Supreme Court clarified that a
legal entity is liable for compensating others for losses incurred due
to violating Article 184.
If you can prove this law was indeed violated, then probably the next question is: what damages can you prove?
1 Like
Anyway, can you recommend a good lawyer instead of worrying about whether they broke the law or not.
1 Like
Your law does not mention retaliation.
Ok, but do you know a good lawyer I can talk to?
1 Like
I do. But consultations cost money
And I don’t think this is a case where you have a leg to stand on
2 Likes
Ok, thank you for your concern, but I’d rather speak to a legal professional about it.
1 Like
Oh I am not expressing concern. Trust me. But you gotta actually show me where the law is before I waste his time.
I only have so much goodwill to spend.
The only ‘retaliation’ I know of is in the labour law.
A person who, intentionally or negligently, has wrongfully damaged the rights of another is bound to compensate him for any injury arising therefrom. The same rule shall be applied when the injury is done intentionally in a manner against the rules of morals.
A person, who violates a statutory provision enacted for the protection of others and therefore prejudice to others, is bound to compensate for the injury, except no negligence in his act can be proved.
What rights were violated?
2 Likes
5 Likes
This thread has the potential to be an interesting and informative discussion (and this is a “discussion” forum, right?) about the law. But that won’t happen if any attempts to discuss the specifics of the law are repeatedly dismissed.
2 Likes
“he broke the law.”
“which law?”
“trust me bro”
2 Likes
In general, I’d agree with you.
For this specific thread by this specific OP, you probably missed the backstory if you think there can be an interesting and informative discussion here:
https://tw.forumosa.com/t/got-excluded-from-jka-taiwan-is-there-any-legal-recourse/256018
(The last one was temped - to summarize: OP got into an argument with their instructor, let their dad write a letter and blamed everything on the instructor not being accommodating enough for their autism. OP then wants to sue the instructor despite everyone telling them that this is a bad idea. And now OP is back asking for lawyer recommendations).
Also, there seems to have been some controversy about OP getting a bus driver fired - and later apparently admitting that they just made up part of the accusations (at least that was alluded to in the temped thread as far as I remember).
6 Likes
Here we go again.
4 Likes
u forgot the gym incident…
2 Likes
and the job , did he have some problem with a job as well…
6 Likes
I recommend that no-one gets involved in this thread, from previous posts it seems that the OP has a history which seems to involve upsetting people and then making claims against them.
7 Likes
Yes
Yes but I don’t want to tell you.
8 Likes
Merged with one of the multiple threads on this topic. Again: if anyone has a valuable contribution please PM me to unlock. If not, this stays locked due to no useful legal discussion.
@ninman please refrain from creating more and more posts about your multiple grievances that have already been discussed ad nauseam.
15 Likes