I also agree with Dbbowman that it is a valid disucussion. Like he says, it has been touched on in numerous other threads.
It seems a sensitive issue. People are always very quick to jump up and say 1 - no difference exists OR 2 - If a difference exists it is irrelevant.
I find both of these responses a bit silly. Every other part of the human anatomy tends to differ in size (between both races and individuals), so why should penises be different? And if they do differ in size, why shouldn’t the difference make a difference in bed (at least to a certain percentage of women)? Sure, maybe it is unimportant to a some women, and maybe important to others. Does this seem reasonable? Could I even dare to say that, all other things being equal, size might actually make a difference to the majority of women?
This seems kind of patently obvious to me. Hardly radical stuff.
Sure, there are more important things to worry about, but hell, if we have nothing better to do why not flog this horse until its, if not actually dead, at least a little sore?
Now, I guess I have something to say to Alien (sorry, I don’t quite know how to do the quotes thing, but you can see my original post and her reply below)
Originally posted by kiwi:
he swore off local women, saying he was wearing himself out trying to get them to orgasm. He claimed it was the size difference.
Reply by Alien
This has to be one of the most sexist and ridiculously misinformed ideas I’ve ever heard! Hello, women don’t necessarily orgasm vaginally! It takes a man with “G-spot radar” to do that trick. Sounds like your boy may have some anatomical issues leading to his lack of sexual prowess.
As for nobs and holes, and their sizes on various races, this discussion is more suitable for our friends at Tealit, don’t you think? Perhaps you could start a thread there called, ‘length or girth?’
Alien, can you please tell me what is sexist about what my friend said? Also, please tell me what is misinformed about it?
The first part, ‘sexism’ . . . Sorry, but I just don’t get how his statement was ‘sexist’. It was just something my friend said to me. Sexist implies that my friend was somehow degrading women. I don’t see how he was being degrading, he was just reporting his experience.
The second part, ‘misinformed’. . . My friend had no problems getting these women to orgasm, he just wasn’t doing it with his ***** . I got the impression he was most adept with his hands, tongue, or whatever. Well OK, I guess that was what he told me (: . Still, I knew one of the girls he was with, and she seemed delighted with him. However, and this is my point, my friend found the whole thing not really to his taste, and he felt that the problem came down to size. He also felt things were easier with Asian women.
Now OK, all of the above is just one guy’s subjective opinion. But I don’t think we should be too quick to call him ‘misinformed’. I think calling him ‘misinformed’ is really just a way of saying that we don’t like to hear what he has to say.
BTW Alien, you mentioned my friend’s “lack of sexual prowess”. My original message wasn’t supposed to give that impression. He was actually very popular with the ladies, and I imagine they found him a delight to share a bed with.
Last point. . . Yes, I think we all know that ‘women don’t necessarily orgasm vaginally’. I feel you are patronizing me a tad here.
I guess I’m singling you out with this post Alien. Don’t get me wrong, I don’t want to piss you off. I just think you have got my friend’s meaning (and my conclusions) a little wrong. But hey, no hard feelings! Just ignore me if I’m annoying you.
Finally, I don’t really see this topic as purile (as Alien seemed to suggest with the comments about Tealit etc.). I think it is kind of interesting. I also think these sexual issues can influence cross cultural/racial interactions in other areas. This makes it quite an important background issue in our lives here.