Or just into the corrupt Climate Change black hole, never to be seen again.
1 Like
Let’s trial this on the useless eaters. Safe and effective.
The parasite elites do call us ‘cattle’ so…
If only they had this when there were 40 million Bison in the USA, we would not have destroyed errrrffff as a result.
And speaking of cash cows - fart vaccines. What happened to those burp masks for cows. Capers everywhere in this business.
1 Like
I can’t even understand this lol.
1 Like
You mean Musk and those guys…I thought they were the good guys these days.
Confusion abounds !!!
Who are you talking about?
Why do you think that?
Exactly …what are you talking about ?
Are you saying Musk and Trump are the bad guys now. 
Good grief. I actually said:
not “what” 
Nothing I referenced in my post mentions Musk at all, nor any unnamed or mysterious “other guys.” It was you that mentioned Musk , Trump, and the nameless.
So, and again, who exactly are you talking about when you say:
? 
My references also don’t mention Trump, so I’m not sure what you’re going on about. Is this a Trump thread?
I don’t think I’ve ever posted about Musk or Trump in this forum, at all. If I would say anything about them, I’d say they are both quite off piste.
1 Like
You are moaning about EVs and AI. You must have it in for Musk and his buddies now. TPTB.
Tsk tsk.
It’s hardly a moan. It’s much closer to sarcasm, satirical commentary. I’d even accept rhetorical critique. If it was plain old moaning then I wouldn’t have supplied references or paper(s).
You seem obsessed with Musk, Trump and some others you refuse to name. I’m neither pro or anti - Musk/ Trump/ (or Biden/ Harris/ your unnamed “others”). I wish them all the very best. I don’t “have it in” for anyone. If you remain unsure, go have a troll through my posts for any and all posts where I’m slamming or promoting any of these figures. Please report your findings for all to see.
R u ok? You’re the only one who is mentioning some unnamed people again. Clearly you didn’t read the paper or articles I cited. You’ve added nothing except some unhinged ranting about Musk, Trump, other guys and TPTB. If you want to keep it civil and productive, then either respond to the content I posted, or you’re better off keeping it to yourself.
2 Likes
Ah I’m the one that’s unhinged. 
Not all the other stuff up there 
You are complaining about carbon emissions related to EVs and AI but have no comment on people burning oil or coal the main source of emissions.
And nobody knows who you are actually complaining about since you don’t even specify it.
Seems to be the mysterious TPTB again.
It’s kinda weird.
What in Odin’s name are you talking about? Be specific.
Jeepers. Now we have to follow your orders on what we need to post? lol
This clearly sounds paranoid—you’re obsessing over some vague, shadowy “them.”
You got that right. That you’re worried about Musk or Trump, some mysterious “others,” or “TPTB,” isn’t any of my concern. It’s also completely off topic and irrelevant to the content of my post.
1 Like
Can’t say we don’t learn anything here!
2 Likes
A few truth bombs in the Landman drama.
To be more specific, the rapid surge in warming was supercharged by a dearth of low-lying clouds over the oceans, according to the research — findings which may have alarming implications for future warming.
In simple terms, fewer bright, low clouds mean the planet “has darkened,” allowing it to absorb more sunlight, said Helge Goessling, a report author and climate physicist at the Alfred Wegener Institute in Germany.
This phenomenon is called “albedo” and refers to the ability of surfaces to reflect the sun’s energy back into space.
The Earth’s albedo has been declining since the 1970s, according to the report, due in part to the melting of light-colored snow and sea ice, exposing darker land and water which absorb more of the sun’s energy, heating up the planet.
Low clouds also feed into this effect as they reflect away sunlight.
The scientists scoured NASA satellite data, weather data and climate models and found the decline in low clouds reduced the planet’s albedo to record lows last year. Areas including parts of the North Atlantic Ocean experienced a particularly significant fall, the study found.
Last year fits into a decade-long decline of low cloud cover, Goessling told CNN.
Looks like we held back the next ice age once again! 
Or is it just ‘experts’ blowing hot air?
1 Like
This video is not related to global average
Of course it is.
You have to admit there is a suspicious pattern.
https://ir.ceu.edu/ohpa/research_blog/articles/rusdisinformation
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272494423001779
The ~97% climate change consensus fallacy.
1 Like