Google Plans to Prevent "Trump Situation" in 2020, aka Google is 💩 thread

Insider: Google “is bent on never letting somebody like Donald Trump come to power again.”
Google Head of Responsible Innovation Says Elizabeth Warren “misguided” on “breaking up Google”
Google Exec Says Don’t Break Us Up: “smaller companies don’t have the resources” to “prevent next Trump situation”
Insider Says PragerU And Dave Rubin Content Suppressed, Targeted As “Right-Wing”
LEAKED Documents Highlight “Machine Learning Fairness” and Google’s Practices to Make Search Results “fair and equitable”
Documents Appear to Show “Editorial” Policies That Determine How Google Publishes News
Insider: Google Violates “letter of the law” and “spirit of the law” on Section 230

Here it is, Google top management team (TMT) members basically admitting on hidden camera their plans to influence the 2020 election.
Need a separate thread for this, as it’s a bit different from the other bad bad things Google does, as @mad_masala has noted elsewhere.


Crazy but not surprising.

I was on the same wavelength as @rowland who posted the same news at nearly same timeprint, but from Breitbart in the 2020 election thread.
My thoughts exactly as him.
Break Google up on January 21, 2021, just like AT&T.

1 Like

I don’t get it, wouldn’t it be against their interest to get a Democrat elected though. Democrats never like big corporations like google and hate these tech giants more after Trump got elected because they blame them for their platform.

yeah but orange man bad

1 Like

That’s a good one! :rofl:

This (not your comment about the Dems but the theme of this thread) is like net neutrality all over again. “Never let the state interfere in the private sector because that’s socialism… except when it suits our side.” :balance_scale:


That’s not socialism but w/e.

Don’t hate me when I quote you on that, okay? :slight_smile:

Maybe if it was an actual quote :lying_face:

Biden, the current Democratic frontrunner, said Warren makes “a very strong case” for breaking up tech giants, adding it’s "something we should take a really hard look at

Do I even need to quote Bernie?

Booker is the only one that is between the line on the issue. But I suspect he will need to pick a side soon.

Did I miss anyone? I supposed I should prepare for some instance in one particular time where this is not true. Your usual play book.

That settles it, then. Next time I quote your exact words, you will stand and take it. :boxing_glove:

between the line

That’s a great place to look. :+1:

Anyway, it seems you and Elizabeth have something in common now, even if you disagree about the details. :rainbow:

Or you can not attack a position you made for me…not a hard request.


Your exact words are the ones from “That’s” to “w/e”, and yes the context matters, so it could be rephrased as “letting the state interfere in the private sector is not socialism”, but because I promised to use your exact words, I will just quote the block of text showing which words are mine and which yours. Clear now? :slight_smile:

Now you’re just being silly. I do my best to quote you in context and accurately attack the position you make. I just ask for the same courtesy.

Then why do you get so upset when I quote you? We had a whole discussion about that, remember?

(Sorry @Mick this is clearly off topic. Feel free to move us.)

No I don’t. The only reason I could think of is you’re misrepresenting what I said.

So, if I include the context, that should prevent misrepresentation from occurring, right?

I don’t think you need me to explain how to accurately represent what someone else is saying.

We’ll see. :slight_smile:

I believe in you. You can do it!

Anyways. Off to bed for me.