Hamas has ended the truce with Israel

[quote]“There is no longer any truce with the enemy,” said the statement broadcast over a Hamas radio station early on Saturday.

Rockets have been launched from Gaza into Israel and Israeli aircraft have struck targets in the Palestinian territory in the back-and-forth aftermath of deadly attacks a day before in southern Israel.

At least 14 Palestinians have been killed and 30 were injured in the past 24 hours by Israeli air strikes on the Gaza Strip which began on Thursday. Four Israelis have been injured by rockets fired from Gaza.
english.aljazeera.net/news/middl … 00852.html
[/quote]

I hope this ends soon. We just can’t go on like this.

It’s been going on for a long time. Sadly, I’m sure it will continue.

So if Hamas call an end to a truce on Saturday in response to Israeli airstrikes that began on Thursday, shouldn’t it say “Israel ends truce”? :ponder:

Depends. Was that before or after the attack on the Israeli solders?
And was that before or after any other attacks?
:s

No idea but all the report I read mentioned was airstrikes on Thurs and end of truce on Sat. It didn’t talk about any other attacks.

There was an attack in Israel before the airstrikes.
Terrorists crossed from Egypt attacked and killed Israeli motorists.

And it seems that the Israeli counterstrike killed five Egyptian soldiers, so Egypt’s recalled its ambassador. No doubt a popular move ahead of the elections there; no doubt more of a headache for Bibi Nyetyahoo on top of all those protests.

Hamas attacks Israel, Israel responds, Terrs flee through Egyptian territory, Egyptian soldiers get caught in the cross-fire, Egypt recalls Ambassador (probably for about 3 days) and the terrs score another victory in the media. And innocents die. SSDD.

[quote]"Israel’s Defence Minister said Israel deeply regrets the deaths of Egyptian troops killed during a shootout between Israeli soldiers and Palestinian militants.


Ehud Barak said he has ordered a military investigation and a joint inquiry with the Egyptian army to clarify the circumstances of Friday’s incident, when militants from Gaza crossed into southern Israel through the Egyptian desert and launched a deadly attack that killed eight Israelis. "

tinyurl.com/4yzbmt8[/quote]

Hamas had a truce? :roflmao: :roflmao:

You have GOT to be kidding.

Uh, no… I have got to be…

Wheres Murubak when you need him? He did keep the truce for around 30 years or so.
The unfortunate truth is that most middle eastern countries need a strongman in charge to keep militant islam in check. Democracy does not seem to work in many of these countries. If Egypt cannot secure its borders Israel will have to.

[quote=“bigduke6”]Wheres Murubak when you need him? He did keep the truce for around 30 years or so.
The unfortunate truth is that most middle eastern countries need a strongman in charge to keep militant islam in check. Democracy does not seem to work in many of these countries. If Egypt cannot secure its borders Israel will have to.[/quote]

What’s in it for Egypt to secure it’s borders?

[quote=“bigduke6”]Wheres Murubak when you need him? He did keep the truce for around 30 years or so.
The unfortunate truth is that most middle eastern countries need a strongman in charge to keep militant islam in check. Democracy does not seem to work in many of these countries. If Egypt cannot secure its borders Israel will have to.[/quote]
:laughing:
:roflmao:
Thanks for that lesson in imaginative history.

[quote=“Jaboney”][quote=“bigduke6”]Wheres Murubak when you need him? He did keep the truce for around 30 years or so.
The unfortunate truth is that most middle eastern countries need a strongman in charge to keep militant islam in check. Democracy does not seem to work in many of these countries. If Egypt cannot secure its borders Israel will have to.[/quote]
:laughing:
:roflmao:
Thanks for that lesson in imaginative history.[/quote]

Actually, he’s right.

So far, we have seen successful democracy nowhere in the Middle East except Israel. You cannot have democracy without good, untainted, universal education. Palestinian democracy has failed precisely because the system set up by the Oslo accords was corrupted.

Democracy requires universal education - where they teach peace, among other things.

And yes, if Egypt cannot secure it’s borders, Israel will need to do so - which might include occupying a ‘buffer zone’ in the Sinai.

[quote=“Chuanzao El Ale Destroyer”][quote=“bigduke6”]Wheres Murubak when you need him? He did keep the truce for around 30 years or so.
The unfortunate truth is that most middle eastern countries need a strongman in charge to keep militant islam in check. Democracy does not seem to work in many of these countries. If Egypt cannot secure its borders Israel will have to.[/quote]

What’s in it for Egypt to secure it’s borders?[/quote]

Keeping the Egypt Israel peace treaty in place is more important for the Egypt than Israel. Egypt is extremely weak militarily now, and even when they were strong they were routed. This was when Israel was fighting on more than one front. There is also the US $ 2 billion that the Egyptians get every year from the USA as an incentive.
And don’t think for a second the Israelis will not occupy a buffer zone if required. If the accords end up going to hell they might as well occupy the entire peninsula. Not as far fetched as some might think. Especially with a right wing gov. I also read recently that one of the leading opp figures in Egypt, Ayman Nour, has said the treaty should be reassessed. Now the Army is in control of Egypt, but after elections who knows what will happen?.

In fact according to the Egypt Israeli peace treaty, the peninsula is supposed to be demilitarized by Egypt.

Israel let them move two battalions in recently, who should be at Sharm El Sheik, not anywhere near the border.

[quote=“Got To Be Kidding”][quote=“Jaboney”][quote=“bigduke6”]Wheres Murubak when you need him? He did keep the truce for around 30 years or so.
The unfortunate truth is that most middle eastern countries need a strongman in charge to keep militant islam in check. Democracy does not seem to work in many of these countries. If Egypt cannot secure its borders Israel will have to.[/quote]
:laughing:
:roflmao:
Thanks for that lesson in imaginative history.[/quote]

Actually, he’s right.[/quote]
Actually, not. There have been remarkably few attempts to run a democracy in the region. History provides no reason to argue that “democracy does not seem to work in many of these countries.” Similar arguments were made, once upon a time, about Asian countries and look at the region now – messy, but definitely embracing democracy.

Any attack on civilians from both sides is despicable! What ever the reason maybe.
Attacks on militants from both side is fair game, if you choose to fight, whether through terrorism or an army, be prepared to die.

[quote=“Got To Be Kidding”][quote=“Jaboney”][quote=“bigduke6”]Wheres Murubak when you need him? He did keep the truce for around 30 years or so.
The unfortunate truth is that most middle eastern countries need a strongman in charge to keep militant islam in check. Democracy does not seem to work in many of these countries. If Egypt cannot secure its borders Israel will have to.[/quote]
:laughing:
:roflmao:
Thanks for that lesson in imaginative history.[/quote]

Actually, he’s right.

So far, we have seen successful democracy nowhere in the Middle East except Israel. You cannot have democracy without good, untainted, universal education. Palestinian democracy has failed precisely because the system set up by the Oslo accords was corrupted.

Democracy requires universal education - where they teach peace, among other things.

And yes, if Egypt cannot secure it’s borders, Israel will need to do so - which might include occupying a ‘buffer zone’ in the Sinai.[/quote]

Palestinian democracy was never given a chance by Israel and the US because as soon as the Palestinians voted for someone that Israel/US didn’t like, they stopped dealing with them. Hamas may not have been the best choice to run Palestine but they were the party elected by the Palestinians - at the very least Israel and the US should have tried to meet them halfway instead of shutting the door from day one.

[quote=“Got To Be Kidding”][quote=“Jaboney”][quote=“bigduke6”]Wheres Murubak when you need him? He did keep the truce for around 30 years or so.
The unfortunate truth is that most middle eastern countries need a strongman in charge to keep militant islam in check. Democracy does not seem to work in many of these countries. If Egypt cannot secure its borders Israel will have to.[/quote]

:lol: :roflmao:Thanks for that lesson in imaginative history.
[/quote]
Actually, he’s right.

So far, we have seen successful democracy nowhere in the Middle East except Israel. You cannot have democracy without good, untainted, universal education. Palestinian democracy has failed precisely because the system set up by the Oslo accords was corrupted.

Democracy requires universal education - where they teach peace, among other things.

And yes, if Egypt cannot secure it’s borders, Israel will need to do so - which might include occupying a ‘buffer zone’ in the Sinai.[/quote]GTBK -
Quite right in your brief analysis. A very complicated, obviously, situation with no short simple answers.
Israel is the only place in the ME where any successful attempt at representative democracy has occurred. Interestingly, this has happened in a state that founded upon a religious belief. A belief that has provided acceptance, integration and guarantee of equality for all its citizens.

There are some big camels noses under the tent in this - Syria, Iran, the Muslem Brotherhood(remember that name) and Mohammedanism. All conspire to annihilate Israel. Israel still survives.

I suggest doing a search on the writer Caroline Glick for timely info on the situation. She is well versed in the events in the ME from both a both historical perspective and current actions.

Caroline Glick on Thursday’s terror attacks

Blood in the Streets

quote
"In a sharp departure from Mubarak’s policies, the ruling military junta opened Egypt’s border with Gaza and so gave local and regional jihadists the ability to freely traverse the international border.

Hamas and its fellow terrorists have used this freedom not only to steeply expand the missile and personnel transfers to the Gaza Strip. They have also escalated their challenge to Egyptian regime control over Sinai.

Over the past several months, in addition to recurrent bombings of the gas pipeline, these forces have attacked police stations and the port at Nueiba. In the wake of their July 30 attack on El-Arish in which two policemen and three civilians were killed, jihadist cells distributed leaflets calling for the imposition of Islamic law on Sinai.

According to media reports, jihadists also took over many of the main highways in Sinai at the beginning of August.

THESE LATEST assaults and the open challenge the leaflets and road takeovers pose to Egyptian state authority caused the military to deploy two battalions of armored forces to Sinai last weekend.

The stated aim of their operation is to defeat the al-Qaida-affiliated jihadist cells operating in the peninsula. Since Egypt’s peace treaty with Israel prohibits the deployment of Egyptian military forces to Sinai, the Egyptian military regime requested and received Israeli permission for the deployment.

It is unclear how effective the latest Egyptian military deployment had been until Thursday’s cross-border attacks on Israel had been. What is clear enough is that Israel cannot expect to receive serious cooperation from the Egyptian military in combating the enemy forces emanating from Sinai. Indeed, at this point it is impossible to rule out the possibility that Egyptian military personnel participated in the murderous attacks.

Passengers in one of the civilian cars attacked by gunmen in the first stage of the operation told the media that their attackers were wearing Egyptian army uniforms.

Almost immediately after the attacks took place, Egyptian military authorities denied the attackers entered Israel from Sinai. These denials signaled that the Egyptian military government will not assist Israel in its efforts to defend itself against the rapidly escalating threats it now faces from Sinai.

And this is not surprising. Since it overthrew Mubarak, the ruling military junta has assiduously cultivated close ties with the politically ascendant Muslim Brotherhood."[/quote]

From reports, the Egyptian military in this area are allowing the terrorists to engage in their activities if not actively assisting them.

Yeah, Glick isn’t too bad. I think that I’ve run into her a few times.

I also ran into the Norwegian woman responsible for setting up the education component under the Oslo Accords. She was so furious with Arafat, she was almost speechless.

However, there is one point against her. She thought that the fake Helly Hansen jacket that I bought in Turkey was the real deal. I didn’t have the heart to tell her otherwise.

[quote=“cfimages”][quote=“Got To Be Kidding”][quote=“Jaboney”][quote=“bigduke6”]Wheres Murubak when you need him? He did keep the truce for around 30 years or so.
The unfortunate truth is that most middle eastern countries need a strongman in charge to keep militant islam in check. Democracy does not seem to work in many of these countries. If Egypt cannot secure its borders Israel will have to.[/quote]
:laughing:
:roflmao:
Thanks for that lesson in imaginative history.[/quote]

Actually, he’s right.

So far, we have seen successful democracy nowhere in the Middle East except Israel. You cannot have democracy without good, untainted, universal education. Palestinian democracy has failed precisely because the system set up by the Oslo accords was corrupted.

Democracy requires universal education - where they teach peace, among other things.

And yes, if Egypt cannot secure it’s borders, Israel will need to do so - which might include occupying a ‘buffer zone’ in the Sinai.[/quote]

Palestinian democracy was never given a chance by Israel and the US because as soon as the Palestinians voted for someone that Israel/US didn’t like, they stopped dealing with them. Hamas may not have been the best choice to run Palestine but they were the party elected by the Palestinians - at the very least Israel and the US should have tried to meet them halfway instead of shutting the door from day one.[/quote]

How do you meet them halfway? There charter calls for the destruction of Israel.

Hamas’s 1988 charter calls for the replacement of Israel and the Palestinian Territories with an Islamic Palestinian state. After the elections in 2006, Hamas co-founder Mahmoud Al-Zahar did not rule out the possibility of accepting a “temporary two-state solution”, and stated that he dreamed “of hanging a huge map of the world on the wall at my Gaza home which does not show Israel on it.”[58] Xinhua reports that Al-Zahar “did not rule out the possibility of having Jews, Muslims and Christians living under the sovereignty of an Islamic state.”[58] In late 2006, Ismail Haniyeh, the political leader of Hamas, said that if a Palestinian state was formed within the 1967 lines, Hamas was willing to declare a truce that could last as long as 20 years, and stated that Hamas will never recognize the “usurper Zionist government” and will continue “jihad-like movement until the liberation of Jerusalem”