Just had a quick chat with the mod, 914, and am replying in her stead! In a thread like this concerning an ongoing tragedy, posts about related political and other questions would be better made in a separate thread. Here are two other such threads:
[quote=“Tempo Gain”]Just had a quick chat with the mod, 914, and am replying in her stead! In a thread like this concerning an ongoing tragedy, posts about related political and other questions would be better made in a separate thread. Here are two other such threads:
To clarify, talk about “worse carnage happening elsewhere” and the like can be considered as somewhat inconsiderate to those who were hurt, maimed and or killed in this incident. A thread concerning a tragedy may well be moderated in this way. There are other threads where such sentiments can be expressed.
But why myself and Skoster were so annoyed was that a lot of this content was in reply to the ‘Muslims did it’ bit (which was subsequently cut out and highly offensive), and then Hansioux’s posts were let stand which said that we were justifying this bombing, which was completely false.
Exactly. In the original context my post was just pondering how people of different countries react.
I’m not even arguing to keep my post, though I think anyone who sees it as a justification for the bombing is severely misreading it. All I’m really saying is that if one really feels that the political discussion belongs in another thread then one would put all of the political discussion in another thread.
Frankly, I think moderating out comments one doesn’t like about an attack on a country which is specificially attacked because of the freedoms (for instance, speech) which it stands for, is ludicrous. I don’t buy for a second that the moderating was done for any other reason, and I find it a bit distasteful that instead of the person who did it standing up for their actions a proxy comes by to do so, first with one reason and then with another.