I sent off my idea and here is the response I got…
[quote]dear bob
i am so happy that you would like to help me~ ^_______________^
thank you very much!!!
First of all, I strongly agree your opinion that I should be getting in the habit of writing and doing this job slowly and carefully. I prepare do this job every day after the test.
But now, unfortunatelly, the test time is very close; for me now, the grade of the test is the most important thing, because there are lot of following things which are waiting for me to finish after this test. >"< So, i though i should do a very effective work to prepare this test. Here is my idea~~
In the last mail I already explain the question type of the Test~
the Analytical Writing is including 2 part:
Analysis of an Issue and Analysis of an Argument.
(here are more infofmation about these…
mba.com/mba/TaketheGMAT/TheE … in2006.htm )
Since the test time is very short, only 30 min each part, and the questions are similar, so I decide to set a sample form.
what is the sample form? It is with the stable sentences which I can use on every passage.
For expmple:
"The main point of the above argument is that S+V__________________________. ",
"However, the argument is not convincing because its assumption that S+V____________ is questionable. ",
"To sum up, because the argument leaves out several key issues, it is not sound or persuasive. If it included the items discussed above instead of __________________ what , the argument would have been more thorough and convincing. "
With these, I can just change the idea and the example about the different ISSUE or ARGUMENT, and though these pratices I can write very fast when I am going to the test. (Actually, all the Chinese students are doing this! ^^" ~beacuse without this, it is impossable for us to think and write more than 300 words in the 30 minutes~)
This is my idea about to prepare the test, how do you think?
Because of this, the stable sentences are account for 100~ 150 words of the 300 words of every passage.
So, I would like very 不好意思的(pu hw e s de) to ask you, can I pay 150~200 dollars for each passage after the fifth passage? ^^"
(here is a sample passage which the Graduate Management Admission Council supply. This one is perfect score (6). If you are interesting , maybe you can chech it out. )
waiting for your apply~~ ^^
Yours…[/quote]
And here is the sample passage…
[quote]THIS IS THE『 ANALYSIS OF AN ARGUMENT 』SAMPLE QUESTION：
『The following appeared as part of an article in a daily newspaper:
“The computerized on-board warning system that will be installed in commercial airliners will virtually solve the problem of midair plane collisions. One plane’s warning system can receive signals from another’s transponder—a radio set that signals a plane’s course – n order to determine the like likelihood of a collision and recommend evasive action.” 』
Discuss how well reasoned you find this argument. In your discussion be sure to analyze the line of reasoning and the use of evidence in the argument. For example, you may need to consider what questionable assumptions underlie the thinking and what alternative explanations or counterexamples might weaken the conclusion. You can also discuss what sort of evidence would strengthen or refute the argument, what changes in the argument would make it more logically sound, and what, if anything, would help you better evaluate its conclusion.
SAMPLE PAPER 6
The argument that this warning system will virtually solve the problem of midair plane collisions omits some important concerns that must be addressed to substantiate the argument. The statement that follows the description of what this warning system will do simply describes the system and how it operates. This alone dose not constitute a logical argument in favor of the warning system, and it certainly does not provide support or proof of the main argument.
Most conspicuously, the argument dose not address the cause of the problem of midair plane collisions, the use of the system by pilots and flight specialists, or who is involved in the midair plane collisions. First, the argument assumes that the cause of the problem is that the planes’ courses, the likelihood of collisions, and actions to avoid collisions are unknown or inaccurate. In a weak attempt to support its claim, the argument describes a system that makes all of these things accurately known. But if the cause of the problem of midair plane collisions is that pilots are not paying attention to their computer systems or flight operations, the warning system will not solve the collision problem. Second, the argument never addresses the interface between individuals and the system and how this will affect the warning system’s objective of obliterating the problem of collisions. If the pilot or flight specialist does not conform to what the warning system suggests, midair collisions will not be avoided. Finally, if planes other than commercial airliners are involved in the collisions, the problem of these collisions cannot be solved by a warning system that will not be installed on non-commercial airliners. The argument also does not address what would happen in the event that the warning system collapses, fails or does not work properly.
Because the argument leaves out several key issues, it is not sound or persuasive. If it included the items discussed above instead of solely explaining what the system supposedly does, the argument would have been more thorough and convincing.[/quote]
Erp. 
This wasn’t in the brochure was it? I mean really who signed up for this. And what is an MBA anyway, and how do I use one? And so on and so forth, continuing on into infinity…
