[quote]The remains of what has been described as a huge lost city may force historians and archaeologists to radically reconsider their view of ancient human history.
Marine scientists say archaeological remains discovered 36 metres (120 feet) underwater in the Gulf of Cambay off the western coast of India could be over 9,000 years old.
The vast city - which is five miles long and two miles wide - is believed to predate the oldest known remains in the subcontinent by more than 5,000 years.[/quote]
You should look into the genetics studies e.g. Journey of Man documentary describing how an early exodus ex Africa came thru India (probably following marine resources along coastline) and ending up in Australia.
Silly, Atlantis sank 10,500 BC. The Indian place was probably first peopled by refugees from Poseidia. (They flew in on airships.)
Seriously, I’m curious to know if the dating will hold up. (For comparison’s sake, the oldest Mesopotamian cities arose about 5,500 years ago.) I bet the pre-deluge Black Sea civilization (Ryan and Pittman) will turn out to be at least as old as the…what are they calling it? Proto-Bombay civilization? And I suppose someone should take a look off the coasts of East Africa and Iraq / Kuwait (site of the Garden of Eden! really–think of the four rivers), once things settle down there. These places usually have active trade relations.