Iran's plot to mine uranium in Africa

Well…isn’t this special!

[quote]Iran’s plot to mine uranium in Africa
The Sunday Times, August 06, 2006
Jon Swain, David Leppard and Brian Johnson-Thomas

IRAN is seeking to import large consignments of bomb-making uranium from the African mining area that produced the Hiroshima bomb, an investigation has revealed.

A United Nations report, dated July 18, said there was “no doubt” that a huge shipment of smuggled uranium 238, uncovered by customs officials in Tanzania, was transported from the Lubumbashi mines in the Congo.

Tanzanian customs officials told The Sunday Times it was destined for the Iranian port of Bandar Abbas, and was stopped on October 22 last year during a routine check.

The disclosure will heighten western fears about the extent of Iran’s presumed nuclear weapons programme and the strategic implications of Iran’s continuing support for Hezbollah during the war with Israel.

It has also emerged that terror cells backed by Iran may be prepared to mount attacks against nuclear power plants in Britain. Intelligence circulating in Whitehall suggests that sleeper cells linked to Tehran have been conducting reconnaissance at some nuclear sites in preparation for a possible attack.

The parliamentary intelligence and security committee has reported that Iran represented one of the three biggest security threats to Britain. The UN security council has given Iran until the end of this month to halt its uranium enrichment activities. The UN has threatened sanctions if Tehran fails to do so.

A senior Tanzanian customs official said the illicit uranium shipment was found hidden in a consignment of coltan, a rare mineral used to make chips in mobile telephones. The shipment was destined for smelting in the former Soviet republic of Kazakhstan, delivered via Bandar Abbas, Iran’s biggest port.

“There were several containers due to be shipped and they were all routinely scanned with a Geiger counter,” the official said.

“This one was very radioactive. When we opened the container it was full of drums of coltan. Each drum contains about 50kg of ore. When the first and second rows were removed,the ones after that were found to be drums of uranium.”

In a nuclear reactor, uranium 238 can be used to breed plutonium used in nuclear weapons.

The customs officer, who spoke to The Sunday Times on condition he was not named, added: “The container was put in a secure part of the port and it was later taken away, by the Americans, I think, or at least with their help. We have all been told not to talk to anyone about this.”

The report by the UN investigation team was submitted to the chairman of the UN sanctions committee, Oswaldo de Rivero, at the end of July and will be considered soon by the security council.

It states that Tanzania provided “limited data” on three other shipments of radioactive materials seized in Dar es Salaam over the past 10 years.

The experts said: “In reference to the last shipment from October 2005, the Tanzanian government left no doubt that the uranium was transported from Lubumbashi by road through Zambia to the united republic of Tanzania.”

Lubumbashi is the capital of mineral-rich Katanga province, home of the Shinkolobwe uranium mine that produced material for the two atomic bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in August 1945.

The mine has officially been closed since 1961, before the country’s independence from Belgium, but the UN investigators have told the security council that they found evidence of illegal mining still going on at the site.

In 1999 there were reports that the Congolese authorities had tried to re-open the mine with the help of North Korea. In recent years miners are said to have broken open the lids and extracted ore from the shafts, while police and local authorities turned a blind eye.

In June a parliamentary committee warned that Britain could be attacked by Iranian terrorists if tensions increased.

A source with access to current MI5 assessments said: “There is great concern about Iranian sleeper cells inside this country. The intelligence services are taking this threat very seriously.”
timesonline.co.uk/article/0, … 72,00.html[/quote]

related info on this story -
Deep Thoughts - This is Disturbing

Absolute nonsense as usual, TC. Iran seeks nuclear power only as a source of energy. Everyone knows Islam is a religion of peace, and as such Iran would never develop a nuclear weapon, much less give it to the freedom fighters in their righteous struggle against the descendants of pigs and dogs, may Allah’s curse be upon them.

It must be true.
The article is a British newpaper… :uk:

[quote=“TainanCowboy”]It must be true.
The article is a British newpaper… :uk:[/quote]

More importantly, it’s a Murdoch paper. I guess the rest of the MSM plus the UN has decided for their own evil reasons to bury this story- or maybe not

[quote]By now, most of you have probably heard that the London Sunday Times reports that a shipment of smuggled uranium from Congo was intercepted on its way to Iran:

"IRAN is seeking to import large consignments of bomb-making uranium from the African mining area that produced the Hiroshima bomb, an investigation has revealed.

A United Nations report, dated July 18, said there was “no doubt” that a huge shipment of smuggled uranium 238, uncovered by customs officials in Tanzania, was transported from the Lubumbashi mines in the Congo."

This is a frighteningly inaccurate version of events

The UN report, as you may note, does not mention Iran or Kazakhstan, details that the Sunday Times claims to have obtained from anonymous Tanzanian customs officials.

A couple of things worth keeping in mind.

First, said Tanzanian customs officials told the Sunday Times the shipment was bound for land-locked Kazakhstan via the Iranian port of Bandar Abbas:

"The shipment was destined for smelting in the former Soviet republic of Kazakhstan, delivered via Bandar Abbas, Iran’s biggest port."

This fact, which flatly contradicts the headline (“Iran’s plot to mine uranium in Africa”), is safely buried in the seventh paragraph, by which point the average Sunday Times reader will be too worked up to realize he’s reading utter trash.

Second, this is not a large consignment in the sense of the “Saddam Hussein sought significant quantities of uranium.”

The shipment was 100 kilograms of uranium ore—which contains about 70 grams of fissile U-235. A bomb would require 25 kilograms of uranium enriched to 90 percent U-235 —well more than 3 metric tons of uranium ore. Fueling a clandestine uranium enrichment program with 100 kilogram increments of ore would be a huge pain in the ass.

The point is this: The story in the UN Report is not about Iran building a bomb, but rather the desperate conditions near the Shinkolobwe mine and DR Congo in general.[/quote]

armscontrolwonk.com/
ArmsControlWonk | an arms control weblog

And in related news:
[url=http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/news/world/15216524.htm]Iran vows to expand uranium enrichment
TOUGH STANCE DEFIES U.N. DEADLINE TO END NUCLEAR ACTIVITY
By Ali Akbar Dareini, Associated Press

TEHRAN, Iran - Iran vowed Sunday to expand its uranium enrichment, defying a U.N. Security Council deadline for it to suspend its nuclear activities by the end of the month or face the threat of political and economic sanctions.[/url]
and:
[url=http://www.boston.com/news/world/articles/2006/08/01/un_gives_iran_deadline_to_stop_producing_uranium/]UN gives Iran deadline to stop producing uranium
Weakened resolution calls for diplomatic, economic sanctions
By Nick Wadhams, Associated Press | August 1, 2006

UNITED NATIONS – The UN Security Council passed a weakened resolution yesterday giving Iran until Aug. 31 to suspend uranium enrichment or face the threat of economic and diplomatic sanctions.
Iran immediately rejected the council action, saying it would only make negotiations more difficult concerning a package of incentives offered in June for it to suspend enrichment.[/url]
and:
[url=http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/china/2006-08/01/content_653972.htm]Iran’s Aug. 31 deadline under resolution
(AP), Updated: 2006-08-01 06:25

The U.N. Security Council passed a resolution Monday giving Iran until August 31 to suspend uranium enrichment or face the threat of economic and diplomatic sanctions.
Because of Russian and Chinese demands, the text is weaker than earlier drafts, which would have made the threat of sanctions immediate. The draft now essentially requires the council to hold further discussions before it considers sanctions. [/url]

UN interfering in Iranian domestic policy.

I don’t doubt that Iran intends to build a nuclear weapon eventually. However, I’m not sure that this shipment (bound for Kazahkstan, at least according to the article) would be used for that.

One of the peculiar things about this story - this was a shipment of U238, not U235. You cannot use U238 to build a nuclear bomb directly (you can with enriched U235), nor can you use U238 as fuel in a conventional light water reactor. You can convert U238 into Plutonium 239, which indeed can be used for making a bomb, but you need a breeder reactor to do that. I’m not aware that Iran has breeder reactors, I thought that they were building a conventional light water reactor (which requires U235). If they do have a (secret) breeder reactor program, that would be significant.