edition.cnn.com/2011/12/02/world … index.html
They will be crying for Murabak to come back soon.
However, I have always wanted to go to a stoning since watching the Life of Brian…
This has been on the cards since the beginning of the ‘Arab spring’
Only a myopic fool would think a western style shambolic excuse for democracy (allowing a few hundred lobbyists to decide how the country is ran) would result.
Well then its no different to the US house of reps and the Senate then. If they want to have Sharia law I am all for it.
Well then its no different to the US house of reps and the Senate then. If they want to have Sharia law I am all for it.[/quote]
Even if they treat women like dirt and persecute homosexuals and Christians?
…and then feel that it’s their right to conquer their neighbors?
Well then its no different to the US house of reps and the Senate then. If they want to have Sharia law I am all for it.[/quote]
Even if they treat women like dirt and persecute homosexuals and Christians?
…and then feel that it’s their right to conquer their neighbors?[/quote]
Copts were persecuted just as much by Nasser and his free officers, by Sadat and by Mubarak. While I’m displeased by the strong showing of Salafists and the Muslim Brotherhood, I think the threat of the Salafists gaining more representation in the upcoming elections in the Southern regions will moderate the MB into coalition building with the moderate and liberal parties. After all, they are more moderate than the Salafist party and more pragmatic.
That’s a bit of a clayton’s choice though. “Well, I’m going to chop off your finger. The other guy wants to chop of your whole arm.”
I see that there are TWO Islamic parties, one of them apparently more fundamentalist than the other. Does this suggest the existence of nuances unsuspected by the Jewish and Christian right…perhaps even room for negotiation…? (Think of Turkey’s AKP.)
No.
Everyone understands the differences between the Muslim Brotherhood and the Salafists - as in the difference between disaster and catastrophe.
And NO. You CANNOT compare either of them to the AKP.
Don’t drink that brand of Koolaid. It doesn’t end well.
Caroline Glick in the JPost, as usual, makes some strong points:
jpost.com/Opinion/Columnists … ?id=248256
The good old Arab winter! Oh sorry. Spring.
The leading MB candidate is being pretty upfront about his groups aim - Sharia Law.
Egypt Muslim Brotherhood candidate says sharia is main goal
(excert)
“CAIRO (Reuters) - The Muslim Brotherhood’s candidate for the Egyptian presidency, Khairat al-Shater, declared that introducing sharia law would be his “first and final” objective if he wins elections in May and June.”
Its a slow fire and the frogs ain’t jumping out of the pot.
Don’t something like 70% of women in Egypt already have their clitorises cut off in childhood? Sounds like that country is a lost cause to me. 
[quote=“TainanCowboy”]The leading MB candidate is being pretty upfront about his groups aim - Sharia Law.
Egypt Muslim Brotherhood candidate says sharia is main goal
(excert)
“CAIRO (Reuters) - The Muslim Brotherhood’s candidate for the Egyptian presidency, Khairat al-Shater, declared that introducing sharia law would be his “first and final” objective if he wins elections in May and June.”
Its a slow fire and the frogs ain’t jumping out of the pot.[/quote]
Did they not at one stage say, they would not run for the presidency?
After a quick glance at the article, it seems the usual story. Someone made a video that offended some muslims. Does this give them the right to act like they do?
Simple answer: No.
If a stupid video is all it takes to set them off, that says a lot for their stupid, outdated beliefs. The same happened when the Danish newspaper printed the mohammed cartoons.
The marines should have just opened fire.