Last and first lettergame

Recreation Fun & Games
1

These are the rules:

  1. Make the longest sentence you can in which the second word begins with the same letter as the last letter of the first word, etc. The last word must end with the first letter of the first word.
    Heres an example:
    The elephant thought.
2

Scumbag gamblers sing glorious songs.

Like that? :loco: :laughing:

3

[quote=“Dragonbones”]Scumbag gamblers sing glorious songs.

Like that? :loco: :laughing:[/quote]

Yes. You’re my first disciple!

4

Now, does each sentence have to beat the one before it in length, and if so, in the number of words or the number of letters?

5

I would say the quantity of words are more important. The main thing is to have fun, because some short sentences could be worth a lot because of their quality.

6

Alcoholic Canadian noobies shouldn’t teach here.

7

This simply yellow watermelon number regretted doing guava acrobatics, so our railroad devised difficult tofu until lightning gathered diligent tea and dairy yummies, smoking guns sucking gargantuan noob, but terrible effrontery yielded demonstrable effects, so opprobrious surfeits stymied dedicated despots sallying grandiloquent tumult, temporizing garrulous sciatica, and discursive, evanescent turpitude enervated draconian nihilists, so obsequious sycophants suffusing gratuitous squalor refuted diffident touchstones, studying giardia and deprecating gallow web, but taciturn nuance expostulated diurnal largess, sequestering gregarious Swedes.

By the way, does the sentence have to make sense?

8

[quote=“smell the glove”]This simply yellow watermelon number regretted doing guava acrobatics, so our railroad devised difficult tofu until lightning gathered diligent tea and dairy yummies, smoking guns sucking gargantuan noob, but terrible effrontery yielded demonstrable effects, so opprobrious surfeits stymied dedicated despots sallying grandiloquent tumult, temporizing garrulous sciatica, and discursive, evanescent turpitude enervated draconian nihilists, so obsequious sycophants suffusing gratuitous squalor refuted diffident touchstones, studying giardia and deprecating gallow web, but taciturn nuance expostulated diurnal largess, sequestering gregarious Swedes.

By the way, does the sentence have to make sense?[/quote]

Good work, stg! It doesn’t have too, but it would make it wortj much more. By the way, you and the previous poster didn’t follow the rules to the letter. The first and last letter of he sentence also has to be the same.

9

Oh that would be just way too much work.

10

hu? uhhmmm…mmmn…nope…empty

11

“This sucks shit.”

Like that? :slight_smile:

:rainbow: