Its not what I think. If you’re going to be having sex with a child every night as reported in Islamic sources, you liked it. It’s not that big of a jump to say he liked having sex with a child.
There’s been many NGOs like the Organization of Islamic cooperation trying to pressure law makers in limiting free speech according to sharia compliance. There’s many none binding bills passed in Canada and other bills that got rejected, and there’s been the expending of the scope of existing laws that do that.
We seem to be going way off topic, if you would like to have a discussion on the ins and outs of Islam or free speech might I suggest starting a thread on that topic elsewhere.
It turns out that guy didn’t actually shoot back. It seems like the terrorist dropped a gun and went back to his car to get more. Then this man grabbed the dropped gun, chased him outside with it, and then hurled it through his back window. The terrorist thought he was being shot at, and he fled the scene.
If the people of New Zealand move towards banning semi-automatic weapons like they were gonna do back in 2009, before the NSA pushed to have it overturned, then perhaps things like this wouldn’t happen again, at least not with this kind of fatalities.
Australia’s Port Arthur trajedy got the country together. Perhaps New Zealand would do the same.
If the whole point of having these weapons is for hunting, like so many people claim when arguing for a loose gun law, in what situation do you really need these weapons for hunting?
I mean if you miss one shot, the animals would be scurrying away anyway, what’s the point of having 10 or 20 consecutive shots for hunting? They are only needed when fighting off a swarm of giant ants or tarantulas, or kill of bunch of people…