Microsofts own google earth

Microsoft launches Google Earth competitor

From itweek.co.uk/vnunet/news/216 … 3d-content

Virtual Earth 3D models of cities added to Windows Live map system

Microsoft has released a new map component of its Windows Live service that the comapny claims will make service more visually appealing and intuitive.

The Virtual Earth 3D content will be available as an optional view in Windows Live Local Search, Microsoft’s browser-based mapping and navigation service. Initially, the 3D content will be available for 15 US cities, including San Francisco, Boston, Seattle, and Los Angeles. Microsoft expects to have content for over 100 cities worldwide by September of 2007.

One of the main highlights of Virtual Earth is the highly-detailed landscape. Buildings are presented in realistic colors and textures, a process that would normally require large amounts of time and millions of dollars. Competing services such as Google Earth are based on satellite photos, where Microsoft uses aerial photography

Stephen Lawler, the general manager of Microsoft’s virtual earth business unit, told vnunet.com that last spring’s acquisition of mapping firm Vexcel gave Microsoft access to new mapping and image-gathering technology. That technology allowed the company to automate and streamline the 3D modeling process for the cities, allowing them to be created faster and as much as 10 per cent cheaper.

Unlike Google Earth, which is a stand-alone application, Microsoft has chosen to make Virtual earth browser-based. The company will allow users to incorporate their own mash-up content on top of Virtual Earth 3D. A similar service is also available for the current version of Windows Live Local.

The fact that Windows Live and Virtual Earth will be browser-based, rather than a separate application, could give Microsoft an advantage over Google in bringing in new users, according to Greg Sterling, founder of Sterling Market Intelligence.

“It makes it a lot more accessible,” Sterling told vnunet.com. “What Microsoft is doing is bringing the richness of [Windows Live] plus all this 3D stuff into the browser window.”

Sterling sees Virtual Earth 3D not as simply a search or mapping tool, but as a move towards a visual, 3-dimensional internet. He points to the success of such 3D communities as Second Life and World of Warcraft as examples.

“I think there will be a way to navigate the internet visually,” said Sterling, “with the rise of these visually rich environments you’ve got video online, more graphical richness, more visual information. I think the idea of combining these visual worlds with mapping is very interesting.”

Microsoft said that keeping the illusion of a virtual world was even considered in the way advertising was displayed. Advertisements will be included in Virtual Earth, but Lawler explained that they will be incorporated into the environment as items such as billboards on top of buildings.

Sue Feldman, research vice president of the content technologies group for research firm IDC, praised the advertising system.

“It gives you more advertising space, and in terms of what’s going on in the digital marketplace today, it’s a good idea,” Feldman told vnunet.com.

“If they do it well, the advertising will be an enhancement,” said Sterling.

Interesting.

Links that are embedded on the original article:

Windows Live
Microsoft Virtual Earth

Has anyone tried this out?
How does it compare with Google Earth?

[quote=“TainanCowboy”]Has anyone tried this out?
How does it compare with Google Earth?[/quote]

I’m a regular Google Earth user so I thought I’d give this a go. It’s obviously still in development, so some of the criticisms I have may be addressed in later versions.

Pros:

Faster zoom speeds than GE (but comparable to Google Maps)
Smoother colour transition (i.e. it looks more like the earth than the patchwork of satellite photography that makes up GE)
Has some nice aerial photography in limited locations
The 3D stuff is limited, but good where they have it - however it’s less widespread than GE’s 3D modelling (because GE has a huge community putting this stuff together)

Cons:

Doesn’t work smoothly in non-IE browsers (some features don’t work at all)
The edit options are not as flexible or powerful as GE
Resolution was poorer in 5 out of 5 locations I checked (Taipei, Tainan, Washington DC, Bristol (UK) and rural Scotland)

To be honest, I think comparing it to Google Earth is not really fair - apples and oranges. More apt is a comparison with Google Maps, which is a direct competitor and does pretty much the same thing. When that comparison is made, I feel there is less of difference - the MS version is more a less a copy of GM, with some bells added and whistles taken away. :idunno:

If you really want a comparison with GE then I’d say it’s no contest - GE is far and away better in almost every important regard. Hopefully MS’s version will improve and push Google into tuning up their service - then everyone’s a winner.

Taffy -
Thanks for the input. Since I posted the Q I have played a small bit with it. I use Firefox as my default browser and that may explain some of my results.
I’ll play with it some more to get a more complete opinion.

Can’t install the 3-D function since I am not in the right region, the install routing says. :unamused:

Need to tweak some settings in my Control Panel … later maybe …