Back when I was going rounds with Cold Front during that stupid Bell Curve debate, I made this post. I’ll just pompously quote myself:
[quote]
Also, if genetics were the prime determiner of intelligence, then why, when we look at great men and geniuses throughout history, most of them sprout from rather undistinguished families? Many, if not most, of the truly great men in art, business, and politics have been self-made men. Einstein’s mother and father weren’t mathematical geniuses. From a hardly left-wing source, a recent article that makes my point:
[quote]
newstatesman.co.uk/nscoverstory.htm
Someone brought up in a particular milieu - artistic, intellectual, political - is bound to have more desire to enter that world. The surprise is not that David and Edward Miliband, sons of the Marxist intellectual Ralph, are into politics - the surprise would have been if they were not. Likewise, small wonder that Sam West, son of the actors Timothy West and Prunella Scales, is also treading the boards. And given that West is a hell of a Hamlet and Miliband a progressive politician, there seems little to grumble about. Famous parents influence career choices as much as career chances.
This kind of socialisation remains invisible when the surname offers no clue (a trend likely to increase as more women become public figures). Bertrand Russell, for instance, had a certain John Stuart Mill as a godfather. Larry Summers, the high-impact American economist, former Treasury secretary and now president of Harvard, has two uncles with Nobel prizes for economics - Kenneth Arrow and Paul Samuelson. They didn’t get him the job; but they may have made him want it.
Academia is in any case less promising ground for “name nepotism”. Success relies upon doing research good enough to be published in peer-reviewed journals (where typically, the authors’ names are removed). Being Darwin’s granddaughter cuts no ice with the editor of Nature. This may explain why a search for famous families in science and academia is largely fruitless. Reputations are built on the base of your own research work, rather than that of your forebears. Sport is still less forgiving. Being Paula Radcliffe’s brother would not help much if your idea of a fast half-marathon was measured in hours rather than minutes. Stopwatches don’t know your name. As a general principle, the more objective the measures of success in use, the less important your name, DNA or networks. [/quote]
I’m surprised they didn’t mention the Kennedys, the most famous & blatant example in the American public of nepotism in action. The question remains: why do great men so rarely produce great sons? In fact, there often is seen a marked degeneration with each successive generation of aristocratic families. There are exceptions, such as Martin Amis making his father Kingsley proud as an equally fine novelist in his own right, but in general the rule holds.[/quote]