@jimipresley I like them all. It seems that the album is freely available on YouTube… How would a “patron of the arts” support you (perhaps with some of the 6000 clams of tax refund coming up, if that ever happens). I don’t have a CD player, but would buy a CD. Seems the Facebook page says they’re sold out.
Anyways, congrats on the album release and thanks for sharing here.
From the review on Discogs, video footage of the concerts would be pretty incredible if available:
Performances were of such a nature that indemnity forms had to be signed by audience members. It was a dangerous affair that included the likes of pyrotechnics, shooting guns loaded with blanks, throwing petrol on the audience then lighting it and spraying angle grinder sparks onto their on-stage gimp and the audience.
Monetising isn’t the point. The cost will be recouped by selling the merchandise. It’s just to get the stuff out there for our fans.
If it takes off in a big way, that will have to be rethought, but it’s highly unlikely. The stuff’s fucking ancient.
Monetisation of the video is linked to performance and reach. It’s a package that comes with all three.
Perhaps, but my point is, don’t do things that hinder the ability of the algorithm to recommend it to new people.
It is more likely that a video may be selected by the algorithm and made viral if it’s not being suppressed.
Basically, these are extremely low effort things that probably won’t lead to anything, but are risk free and at the very least can lead to more benefits for you.
Who doesn’t like free no-strings-attached money and benefits?
Upload the songs you have in their own videos, put some tags on it, offer links to merch, write a description and let people comment as comment increases engagement which makes the algo continue to recommend it. If you’ve made numerous songs over the years, upload them once a week to increase engagement.
At least, you’ll be in the same position, at most, the sky is the limit. If you continue to make new music, keep uploading.
Yes, please. I’ll definitely buy, but couldn’t find a link. I think a lot of us would support you in this way, not only as a fellow Forumosan, but as a creative and talented artist and a pretty humorous bloke, from my experience.
Heck, we could probably pitch in to buy you a carton of smokes and a couple bottles of whiskey if that’s your preference.
I think the point is that Jimi isn’t in charge of the channel (pitated). It would take a fair amount of effort to report the channel, create your own channel, and reupload the audio/video files as Marco wisely advised. The issue may be getting all bandmates on board, fair distribution of any monetization, and working to popularize the channel/videos. Not exactly an easy set of tasks.
If @jimipresley doesn’t want to be bothered with such things, I completely understand. Having the content released itself, pirated or not, is important for an artist. However, posting some links to your merchandise would likely give you a bit of pocket money. You can post these kind of links in various places that mention your concerts and album.
Helpful Marco as always . Let’s see what @jimipresley has to say. I agree that the YouTube monitization route has potential, especially if there are people willing to help!