it’ll come out. mention words like "whore"and any pretext of patriotism etc goes right out the window.
Interpol also:
interpol.int/public/data/wan … _18919.asp
Jesus Christ, remind me never to really get on the bad side of any of y’all. You terrifying bastards. 
[quote=“Hongda”]Interpol also:
interpol.int/public/data/wan … _18919.asp[/quote]
Hongda, back to one of your posts a little earlier in the thread…
I just watched the local news rerun, and apparently that’s exactly what she was saying today. That and she called a press conference to show off some of Emily’s favorite toys. Makes me wonder what mom’s favorite toys are.
Well, if she is admitting the Julia Cutie photos are her, which she seems to be doing today, I’d say the proof is in the bu-ding. Hell, a little forumosa sleuthing turned up dates from two different sources, one of which is her own archived website, that has Julia/Nadia doing the horizontal mambo at least from April 2002 through Jan 2003. It’s now confirmed that Emily was born in October 21, 2003. Do the math. 
It is, however, entirely possible to post a website in, say, 2004, take it down, then have it archived throughout 2002 and 2003. All we need is a time machine.
All the same, yeah, I’m with you. More proof. Domain registration records, proof of her 5-month pregnant suicide attempt, bondage gear…
has it been reported what she does for a living now?
Don’t know. But why stop speculating about her past?
Interpol says Juan Mei-fen is 64 inches, and the New York Division of Criminal Justice Services has her the same, 5
there’s more than enough speculation to go around!
Fair enough. Let’s get back to cold, hard reality.
[quote=“Chewycorns”][quote=“jfreakah”]
I took a quick shower before starting. Session started out with a nice FBSM, very relaxing, but she dragged it out a little too long. I was more than ready to go by the time she flipped me over for a CBJ. She rolled into a 69 position, and I did some DATY on her. She’s really clean down there and gets wet easily so I enjoyed that a lot. I have trouble feeling anything through a condom, so the CBJ didn’t do anything for me, but YMMV. I was already hard from anticipation though, so we went into cowgirl while I sucked on her breasts. She has great nipples. Again, due to the condom I really couldn’t feel much, so I asked to go into a missionary position. That wasn’t really working either, so she pulled off the condom to work me with her hands. When I got hard enough she slipped on another condom and we went at it in missionary until I blew inside of her. She massaged me down and we chatted for a bit when I asked if we could go again. Our hour was almost up, but she agreed to give me a handjob. Her handjob technique isn’t that great, so she had me close once but it sorta fizzled. I asked her to lick my balls though, and then it only took me a minute or so to finish off. I took another quick shower and gave her a hug goodbye. Overall she’s very cute, very friendly and professional. My only complaints were the lack of kissing and her soapy taste. I really enjoyed licking her all over, but I guess she showered just before I visited and didn’t rinse enough, because the taste of soap was all over her. At least I know she’s clean, but it took a couple of hours before I could get the taste out of my mouth. DATY was still enjoyable though, I only really noticed the soap on her breasts and near her neck.[/quote][/quote]
According to a quick definition search on yahoo FBSM means
[quote=“smell the glove”]
Well, if she is admitting the Julia Cutie photos are her, which she seems to be doing today, I’d say the proof is in the bu-ding. [/quote]
But she can say he made false websites and posted all those fake reviews I think.
Still not solid proof really. Domain name registrations with her credi card used to pay them would probably remove alot of doubt but she’d still say he stole her credit card or used it whithout her knowledge.
Denial Denial Denial is the name of the game here.
Somebody should email that interpol link to the newspress here. Looks alot more convincing then something issued from U.S. authorities.
I think it would make people start having more doubts about her.
Better yet; what was she doing BEFORE she went to New York to be assigned as a KMT paper journalist???
I’m still having visions…something happened here. She gets posted in NY to reduce the heat…or maybe as a favor for services rendered.
This kind of thing seldom ends simply here. I’m expecting it to fire up the political scene once the Apple daily boys do a little digging around.
So what’s the truth now?
Here’s what we know (I think): Taiwanese journalist in NYC who supplements her income working as a high-priced call girl gets pregnant by rich white married man who offers to divorce his wife to marry her, but she feels otherwise, dispute ensues, he gets court order barring her from fleeing, which she disregards to return to Taiwan.
Is that pretty much supported by the evidence? If so, here are my questions for now:
- Did she intend to get pregnant or not? If yes, was it because
(a) she loved him, figured if she got pregnant he’d divorce and they could marry and raise the child together, but she later changed her mind, or
(b) she always wanted a child and figured he had good genes but she always intended to raise it without him, or
© she intended to have his child in order to extort him, or
(d) something else?
If no, that’s understandable. Her johns all claim she insists on using a condom, but mistakes happen. . . or maybe he was special so she let him ride bareback.
- Did he intend to get her pregnant or not?
Seems unlikely given that he was married and she was just some hooker he met, but stranger things have happened. Maybe he felt he was in love with her and wanted a child with her, thought if she got pregnant she would marry him, but he later found out she refused to be domesticated (at least by him). If not, bad luck dude.
[quote=“Mother Theresa”]So what’s the truth now?
Here’s what we know (I think): Taiwanese journalist in NYC who supplements her income working as a high-priced call girl [/quote]
No proof on that yet. Only that some pics of a girl on an escort website were flashed around on t.v. and said to be her.
No confimation it was her or that she herself set up this website.
Fantastic news though that one can be wanted by the US police on a felony and have an Interpol arrest warrant out for one, but be completely and utterly safe in Taiwan from the not-as-long-as-it-thinks-it-is arm of the law!
To hell with the “First Class ticket to Rio, one-way” malarky! Taiwan welcomes international fugitives with open arms! You may even get on the news! Come One, Come All!!
Anyway want to rob a bank with me?
I think once the courts and MOF find out about the interpol detail they will wash their hands of it.
They won’t want to give up one of the few internatonal connections they have over a child custody dispute. Sartin may find himself flying back to the U.S. with both of them I think.
News this morning on t.v:
Sartin faxed newspapers and told them Emily is very happy with him and has not once asked for her mother…blah blah blah…I’m good she’s bad. (means nothing unless a social worker makes same claims)
They flashed one of the wanted websights on t.v. but not the interpol one.
The father’s mother also has a court case going on against the mother of Emily. Not sure what they said but caught a few words on the papers that said something like psychological distress.
Nope. It only applies if you’re Taiwanese. I remember an African American man pulled the same stunt with his child and was deported.
Different strokes for different folks!
[quote=“Elegua”]Nope. It only applies if you’re Taiwanese. I remember an African American man pulled the same stunt with his child and was deported.
Different strokes for different folks![/quote]
But then there was this case in which they sided with the foreign family of the child:
An 8-year-old orphan returned to Brazil after a long international custody battle. The boy, Iruan Ergui Wu, spent three years with Taiwanese relatives of his father, but that family lost its legal battle to keep him and he was being reuinted with his Brazilian maternal grandmother. The boy’s Brazilian mother died when he was 3 and his Taiwanese father died just days after he brought the boy to Taiwan in 2001. Taiwan’s highest court sided with the grandmother last year, but the Taiwanese relatives were reluctant to give Iruan up. On Monday, when the police went to retrieve Iruan, they were met by a mob. Eventually the police managed to grab him.
[quote=“Hongda”][quote=“Elegua”]Nope. It only applies if you’re Taiwanese. I remember an African American man pulled the same stunt with his child and was deported.
Different strokes for different folks![/quote]
But then there was this case in which they sided with the foreign family of the child:
An 8-year-old orphan returned to Brazil after a long international custody battle. The boy, Iruan Ergui Wu, spent three years with Taiwanese relatives of his father, but that family lost its legal battle to keep him and he was being reuinted with his Brazilian maternal grandmother. The boy’s Brazilian mother died when he was 3 and his Taiwanese father died just days after he brought the boy to Taiwan in 2001. Taiwan’s highest court sided with the grandmother last year, but the Taiwanese relatives were reluctant to give Iruan up. On Monday, when the police went to retrieve Iruan, they were met by a mob. Eventually the police managed to grab him.[/quote]
Yeah…I was referring to using Taiwan as a hide out from the law/interpol.
Disappointing article in the Apple today. They’re completely siding with her. They focused a lot on her press conference yesterday where she handed a bunch of toys to some social workers to give to Emily. Only vague references to the psychological report that ruled her unfit to be a mother, no mention of any sort of escorting or international warrants, but heavy on any sort of denial from the mother. Alas.
Like MT, this revelation that Ms. Ruan was an escort, while certainly salacious, doesn’t make a whole lot of sense. Why is an escort letting herself get knocked up? How is he so sure that the daughter is his? I can perhaps understand wanting to raise a love child of some mistress, but of an escort?
[quote=“alidarbac”]Disappointing article in the Apple today. They’re completely siding with her. They focused a lot on her press conference yesterday where she handed a bunch of toys to some social workers to give to Emily. Only vague references to the psychological report that ruled her unfit to be a mother, no mention of any sort of escorting or international warrants, but heavy on any sort of denial from the mother. Alas.
Like MT, this revelation that Ms. Ruan was an escort, while certainly salacious, doesn’t make a whole lot of sense. Why is an escort letting herself get knocked up? How is he so sure that the daughter is his? I can perhaps understand wanting to raise a love child of some mistress, but of an escort?[/quote]
I didn’t post all of the stories from the VIP membership forum last night…same positions, positive reviews etc. However, a few clients complained about the vast “screening procedures” used by Julie before an actual appointment was set. I think looking at this woman as a “common escort” would be incorrect. She is a high-price hooker (500US/hr). Again, this is not her full-time job. She was a journalist for the KMT-run newspaper in New York. She was moonlighting as a hooker to make some extra coin.
I am not surprised that Apple is taking the woman’s side. Remember Singapore and Asian values—The Apple Daily is a joint venture between Next Media and several Singapore state owned companies including Temasek Holdings, the Government of Singapore Investment Corp. MediaCorp, Straits Times Telemedia, and DBS Bank.
[quote=“Chewycorns”]She was moonlighting as a hooker to make some extra coin.
[/quote]
I am discovering that quite a number of Taiwanese (men and women) finance their trips/living expenses abroad this way. 