This is amazing. Obama says the rich are not responsible for their wealth. I don’t know how they do it in the jungle deserts of Kenya, but in the U.S. of A we Americans all work on our own to create our OWN wealth. Kill all socialists.
Personally, I think we should privatize all schools, roads, fire insurance, police departments, prisons, military, news, and government.
He was talking about the roads and bridges, which you’d realize if you actually listen to his speech in context.
Privatize fire departments and police? That would be an insanely destructive idea. Crime and corruption would skyrocket; fires would burn out of control.
I think you’re trolling. Or Poe-ing.
EDIT: Well, having read some of your other posts, I conclude you’re Poe-ing. (Poe’s Law)
He was talking about the roads and bridges, which you’d realize if you actually listen to his speech in context.
Privatize fire departments and police? That would be an insanely destructive idea. Crime and corruption would skyrocket; fires would burn out of control.
I think you’re trolling. Or Poe-ing.[/quote]
You mean, being a cow, or a DIE HARD RED BLOODED 'MERICAN.
And about the fire departments? That’s ridiculous. If you privatize fire departments they’ll put out fires faster, and more efficiently. Let the free market take care of fires.
He was talking about the roads and bridges, which you’d realize if you actually listen to his speech in context.
[/quote]
Nothing was taken out of context. I read the whole speech and it made it worse.
Obama made it very clear that if you had a successful business, it was due to everyone else supposedly building roads, dams, etc. Except only people that PAY TAXES paid to build those roads, dams, etc. The rest just freeload off the work paid for by others.
And even if there are roads, etc., that does NOT mean “everyone” is responsible for someone’s business success. It’s ridiculous.
So if the rich pay more in taxes to build those roads, etc., then did they pay for their own success? If so, why can’t they take more credit?
If you have a successful business but according to Obama you “didn’t build that on your own” then is everyone else to blame for failed businesses? Or does that street only work one way?
LOL. Here we go:
In the speech, Obama gave numerous examples of people he knew that got government assistance along their paths to success. What about people who DID NOT get that help? Who’s responsible for their success? Those who are actually in business will tell you that government red tape is a MAJOR hurdle to setting up and running a business. More government is a hindrance, not a help.
This speech was really eye opening. It very clearly shows just how far out left Obama really is.
[quote=“Obama”]There was a great teacher somewhere in your life. Somebody helped to create this unbelievable American system that we have that allowed you to thrive. Somebody invested in roads and bridges. If you’ve got a business, you didn’t build that. Somebody else made that happen. The Internet didn’t get invented on its own. Government research created the Internet so that all the companies could make money off the Internet.
The point is, is that when we succeed, we succeed because of our individual initiative, but also because we do things together.[/quote]
I don’t think you can blame people for believing that Obama insulted small business owners, because it is being presented that way on all the right wing news: Fox especially. Romney is running attack ads saying the same thing.
Romney has a big advantage with this kind of sleazy propaganda. Democrats take things out of context too, but it never gets the validation from the news networks that Fox gives to anything anti-Obama.
No man is an island. Everyone who ever succeeded did so because of some kind of help from others.
Don’t read a transcript of the speech: you need to listen to the speech, with the intonations, pauses, etc., since it’s part of the nature of human speech. Don’t listen to Fox News’s analysis, because they are lying to you. Listen to the speech.
His entire theme is that when people create things, it’s because of human interaction. An inspirational teacher. Infrastructure that has been built.
Fox and the right wing sources are LYING TO YOU. Here’s the truth of the matter (including the speech: pay attention to the CONTEXT):
[quote=“Dr. McCoy”]
Romney has a big advantage with this kind of sleazy propaganda. Democrats take things out of context too[/quote]
I do not recall…
Context? GOD DOESN’T BELIEVE IN CONTEXT.
Are you crazy? Me and my NRA buddies are planning to move our business to Bohmfawk Arkansas. No public roads, no police stations, and no fire departments in case our shit gets lit up. Just us, guns, and lots of fuckin bears. We’ll make millions. You in?
I mean, technically, everyone pays taxes, even illegal immigrants. Though I totally understand what you’re saying (even though it’s completely misleading)
Obama’s such a socialist, even though his policies are more conservative than Reagan. What a bum.
In the speech, Obama gave numerous examples of people he knew that got government assistance along their paths to success. What about people who DID NOT get that help? Who’s responsible for their success? Those who are actually in business will tell you that government red tape is a MAJOR hurdle to setting up and running a business. More government is a hindrance, not a help.
This speech was really eye opening. It very clearly shows just how far out left Obama really is.[/quote]
I call bullshit on this.
The wording “If you own a business, you didn’t make that!” was pounced on here as too good to pass up.
That statement was 100% taken completely out of context. Obama’s full statement was:
He was talking about the roads and bridges etc. That’s crystal clear.
However since Obama has tossed up this really great but unfortunately obvious misquote, of course the Republicans are going to come up with reasons why it means what they really want it to mean.
If Obama hadn’t used that convenient wording, no one would be talking about this speech at all.
It would put an entirely new spin on politics if we went back to the methods of the 1800s, when you had to actually read the whole speech (or attend it). These days, sound bytes are destroying the intelligence of everyone, and not just in the realm of politics – though politics is infamous for their misuse.
[quote=“Obama”]
There was a great teacher somewhere in your life. [/quote]
:roflmao: :roflmao: :roflmao: . In the American public school system? I’d rather be educated in a sewer than be educated by union teachers in the US.
Thanks to the founding fathers, not Obama
In the early days of the US–the high Federalists and Whigs [e.g., Henry Clay] were the strongest advocates for internal improvements (e.g., canals, roads, central banks etc.) while agrarian Jeffersonians opposed infrastructure and central banking at every turn.
Guess what? Most of these Federalists/Whigs later became Republicans. Eisenhower created the modern highway system. Republicans and their predecessors should be thanked for America’s infrastructure since nationhood, not the Dems.
Bullshit. Businesses that succeed often succeed because they worked around the government rather than being helped by it. Anybody who has worked in a startup or a global company knows this. Government helps business the most when it stays the hell away.
I thought Gore did. Now there is one family that has sucked on the public teet for generations with little return.
In all seriousness through, the internet was started through Cold War spending, money that most post-1968 Democrats have opposed/wanted to slash at every turn.
In the speech, Obama gave numerous examples of people he knew that got government assistance along their paths to success. What about people who DID NOT get that help? Who’s responsible for their success? Those who are actually in business will tell you that government red tape is a MAJOR hurdle to setting up and running a business. More government is a hindrance, not a help.
This speech was really eye opening. It very clearly shows just how far out left Obama really is.[/quote]
I call bullshit on this.
The wording “If you own a business, you didn’t make that!” was pounced on here as too good to pass up.
That statement was 100% taken completely out of context. Obama’s full statement was:
He was talking about the roads and bridges etc. That’s crystal clear.
However since Obama has tossed up this really great but unfortunately obvious misquote, of course the Republicans are going to come up with reasons why it means what they really want it to mean.
If Obama hadn’t used that convenient wording, no one would be talking about this speech at all.[/quote]
Yes or no? Did Obama say it or not? It’s a simple question.
Yes, he was talking about roads and bridges and how you have a successful business because of them. That’s complete BS.
His grandpa owned a house thanks in part to government assistance so EVERYONE that owns a house needs to thank the government. “You didn’t get that on your own.” Yes, some people did.
The truth is it isn’t taken out of context AT ALL. The fact that he was referring to infrastructure doesn’t make it a misquote, as the left wants to spin this. Obama and his ilk truly think that your success (if you have any) only came because of government spending. He has NEVER owned or started a business in his whole life. He has no idea what business owners go through in fighting government regulation to open their businesses and does not care because he’s above all that.
[quote=“ChewDawg”][quote=“Obama”]
There was a great teacher somewhere in your life. [/quote]
:roflmao: :roflmao: :roflmao: . In the American public school system? I’d rather be educated in a sewer than be educated by union teachers in the US.
In the early days of the US–the high Federalists and Whigs [e.g., Henry Clay] were the strongest advocates for internal improvements (e.g., canals, roads, central banks etc.) while agrarian Jeffersonians opposed infrastructure and central banking at every turn.
Guess what? Most of these Federalists/Whigs later became Republicans. Eisenhower created the modern highway system. Republicans and their predecessors should be thanked for America’s infrastructure since nationhood, not the Dems.
Bullshit. Businesses that succeed often succeed because they worked around the government rather than being helped by it. Anybody who has worked in a startup or a global company knows this. Government helps business the most when it stays the hell away.
I thought Gore did. Now there is one family that has sucked on the public teet for generations with little return.
In all seriousness through, the internet was started through Cold War spending, money that most post-1968 Democrats have opposed/wanted to slash at every turn. [/quote]
Exactly. Al Gore never said he “invented the Internet.” But he did pioneer the effort to promote and introduce policy that brought the Internet out of restricted academic and military circles into the mainstream.
Thank Al Gore for the fact that you’re posting on this forum, conservatives.
Back to the point of Obama’s speech: Try running a business without the communications infrastructure we have (which you didn’t build). Postal systems, Internet, telephones, etc. Try shipping your products without roads, bridges, airports. Try selling things without customers to buy them. Try gaining the knowhow to build a business without someone to teach you how - a teacher, a parent, a mentor, an author. The point is, that your business depends on there being other people.
I challenge you: go to a deserted island and try setting up a business. See how that works out for you.
Building a business takes hard work, initiative and ingenuity. And Obama said that in his speech (yet the righties totally ignore that bit). But you can’t do it alone.
People do it at Grand Cayman all time. Sparely populated, basic infrastructure (Airport and electricity), and banking, investment and insurance businesses have no problem at all.
Obama overstates the importance of government, teachers etc. If you want to learn how not to become a risk taker and entrepreneur—you get mentored by a teacher.
Same with infrastructure. The world is full of empty stadiums, ports etc. that were built upon political arrogance.
Businesses want stability, less regulations and red tape, and they want to be left the fuck alone (unless you are Solyndra leeches).
Having Obama say businesses owe their success to government and teachers sounds like Obama is listening to his Bachelor of Public Administration advisors/statists on staff that need reaffirmation of their career decisions ahahahahah.
Obama overstates the importance of government, teachers etc. If you want to learn how not to become a risk taker and entrepreneur—you get mentored by a teacher.[/quote]
And how, pray tell, does the successful businessman learn to read, write and do basic math without a teacher? I can’t think of any circumstances where anybody successful in the modern world has done this.
Obama overstates the importance of government, teachers etc. If you want to learn how not to become a risk taker and entrepreneur—you get mentored by a teacher.[/quote]
And how, pray tell, does the successful businessman learn to read, write and do basic math without a teacher? I can’t think of any circumstances where anybody successful in the modern world has done this.[/quote]
From his/her parents and through his/her own desire to learn/self improvement. Two things that are 100X more important than mediocre public teachers that are a dime a dozen. A person with great nurturing parents and a willingness to learn will succeed no matter how bad his/her teachers are.
yah i remember when the democrats were pro slavery
a derp derp derp, a derp derp derpiderp?
[quote=“ChewDawg”]Bullshit. Businesses that succeed often succeed because they worked around the government rather than being helped by it. Anybody who has worked in a startup or a global company knows this. Government helps business the most when it stays the hell away.
I thought Gore did. Now there is one family that has sucked on the public teet for generations with little return.
In all seriousness through, the internet was started through Cold War spending, money that most post-1968 Democrats have opposed/wanted to slash at every turn. [/quote]
“hi im chewdawg i spand half my post trying to attribute old successes to a no-longer existing party, in an attempt to make a modern, rabidly extreme version seem credible, then turn around and say those successes are useless when convenient”
Obama overstates the importance of government, teachers etc. If you want to learn how not to become a risk taker and entrepreneur—you get mentored by a teacher.[/quote]
And how, pray tell, does the successful businessman learn to read, write and do basic math without a teacher? I can’t think of any circumstances where anybody successful in the modern world has done this.[/quote]
From his/her parents and through his/her own desire to learn/self improvement. Two things that are 100X more important than mediocre public teachers that are a dime a dozen. A person with great nurturing parents and a willingness to learn will succeed no matter how bad his/her teachers are.[/quote]
Firstly, no one said it had to be public teachers. It could be parents, private school teachers, whatever. As long as somebody has taught that child some basics at some point in his/her life, Obama’s statement rings true.
Secondly, Obama is not referring only to government. He’s clearly talking about America and American society as a whole. There is nobody in America today at any level of success that has done it 100% on their own. Nobody.