i see no problem with a private company choosing to ban users who break their rules. specifically when the banned are implicated in attempts at overthrowing the us govt.
i thought conservatives were pro-private business?
think about like this:
parler is a gay couple wanting to get a wedding cake. amazon decides they donât to bake that wedding cake for the gay couple.
you may disagree with the reasoning, but thatâs the deal.
maybe donât break the t.o.s. and instigate violence?
The point is you have a political group that seeks reforms for groups like Twitter in terms of section 230, twitter bans them all under the guise of âfascistsââ also teams up with other big tech to crush startups like Parler under the guise of âfascistsâ despite the content on their own websites being just as if not multiple times worse.
And as usual the useful idiots are cheering them on.
The great thing about capitalism is, it just reflects the opinions of society. So if society felt twitter were being unreasonable, people will just cease to use twitter.
Personally I think it would be great if society self-educated enough to stop with twitter and FB altogether, but especially as forums to digest news.
Iâm not sure where this will get you. You realize once they have taken care of the popular right who want Republicans to represent the people more than corporations under the guise of calling them fascists. Youâre next, they no more want people on the left advocating politicians represent people above corporations any more than they want that from the right.
Iâm not on social media. And nobody shut down parler, again.
Theyâre free to do what they like, assuming they have a product popular enough to fund their own enterprise.
âTheyâ sounds to me like consumers, and society, Iâm not too concerned, that stuff works itself out for the better good. Because society is mostly good.