Peking Spring's post

Have a look at Peking Spring’s now correctly locked post under his own “sigh” thread. My God! Where did that come from? It is absolute and I mean ABSOLUTE crap like that that warrants banning, not BroonAle’s “knob-spam”. BroonAle looks positively saintly in comparison as does the most extreme version of Fred Smith. Never read ANYTHING remotely like it on Forumosa. Never. HE’S the one the mods should be looking at, not someone whose misguided prank backfired.

Free BroonAle The Political Prisoner!

[quote=“sheepshagger”]Have a look at Peking Spring’s now correctly locked post under his own “sigh” thread. My God! Where did that come from? It is absolute and I mean ABSOLUTE crap like that that warrants banning, not BroonAle’s “knob-spam”. BroonAle looks positively saintly in comparison as does the most extreme version of Fred Smith. Never read ANYTHING remotely like it on Forumosa. Never. HE’S the one the mods should be looking at, not someone whose misguided prank backfired.

Free BroonAle The Political Prisoner![/quote]

So my misguided prank backfired. If you can’t tell the difference between an innocent bit of humour and genuine trolling, you deserve to be banned.

[quote=“Peking Spring”][quote=“sheepshagger”]Have a look at Peking Spring’s now correctly locked post under his own “sigh” thread. My God! Where did that come from? It is absolute and I mean ABSOLUTE crap like that that warrants banning, not BroonAle’s “knob-spam”. BroonAle looks positively saintly in comparison as does the most extreme version of Fred Smith. Never read ANYTHING remotely like it on Forumosa. Never. HE’S the one the mods should be looking at, not someone whose misguided prank backfired.

Free BroonAle The Political Prisoner![/quote]

So my misguided prank backfired. If you can’t tell the difference between an innocent bit of humour and genuine trolling, you deserve to be banned.[/quote]

I was going to post ‘idiot’ as reply but that would be an insult to idiots all over the world. There is absolutely nothing funny about Peking Spring’s hate-filled attempt at humour. Nothing at all. Go look at his locked post in the Flounder forum and all will become apparent. The Moderators are looking in the wrong direction for a ban candidate, IMHO.

So? Your user name is offensive. It is an incitement towards bestiality and the Rules here clearly state that encouraging illegal activity is grounds for banning.

Count your days…snow is falling on Peking…it will soon be the winter of your discontent.

BroonAle shall return, you shan’t. I generously give you a week.

Then its 881 Peking Spring. You can join Portia Wang in troller/spammer obscurity.

(If this were my forum, that is.)

Guys, don’t get your girdle in a knot. Two things are obvious - A, he was taking the piss, B, his post doesn’t need to stay on the boards permanently. So it got floundered - that sends all the message we need to send. If he did the same thing over and over again in 36 different threads, well, that would be a horse of a different colour…

Point A. It is not obvious (Not everyone is able to grasp the subtle nuances in language so ineloquently presented as part of his ‘joke’. How would the non-informed reader know that the address was fictitous?
Point B. Obviously.

Do a search on PS’s other posts; they are by and large liitered with expletives and allusions to aggressive behaviour and in one he states in bold that he hates people anyway so therefore it is NOT obvious that it was a joke.

Have a look…

IMHO, that post is worthy, in the context of adhering to the rules of a warning at the very least.

Taken on its own (dunno about his others) it’s just a bit of satire. I don’t think it’s worth getting all upset about. OK, it has to be floundered, but hardly worth an Official Caution or Sin Binning or whatever it’s called.

Jesus sheepshagger, go have a drink, a smoke, or a wank, anything to calm you down. I just read it myself, and that post couldn’t be more obviously a joke if it had “THIS IS A JOKE” in big bold flashing letters either end of the post.

I didn’t bother reading it all the way through. The immediate impression I got was of some aggressive wanker deliberately trying to flout every rule he could in a childish display of disregard for the few guidelines we have to have.

It took me about ten seconds to decide I didn’t need to waste time reading it, and that it wasn’t at all funny. He behaved like an idiot, and if this is how he normally posts then I wouldn’t be surprised to see people call for his banning in future.

Yeah, don’t have a cow, man, have a sheep instead.

IT WAS A JOKE YOU SCRAPIE-HEAD!!!
:smiley: