The only person taking this seriously is Anton, who incidentally started the entire thread.
So I have a question for you Anton: Are you talking about shenghuo(
The only person taking this seriously is Anton, who incidentally started the entire thread.
So I have a question for you Anton: Are you talking about shenghuo(
Of course life translates to
[quote=āantonxieā]Of course life translates to
Good doggy,
you really understand the imperative.
Letās start with lesson 2.
ax
Nice one. Woof, Woof!
Maybe knowing that you can choose your meaning is the answer.
I have often said, in lighthearted moments, that all a man needs to be happy is:
A good meal.
Some beer.
A lovely girlfriend.
Sounds like youāre pretty close to the mark there. We are disgusting creatures, arenāt we?
Who are you calling we? Iām not one of your kind.
ET Home! Phone!
EaTx
Who are you calling we? Iām not one of your kind.
ET Home! Phone!
EaTx[/quote]
And thank God for that.
Well, existentialism is certainly an option. The problem is that there are āno athiests in the foxholeā and apparently this applies to existentialists as well. Sartre lost interest in existentialism in later life and Walker Percy left a version of it for Catholisim in his later years. I guess when you are younger, the idea of creating your own meaning sounds cool, but as you get older, it loses some of its attraction.
I wasnāt sure what existentialism meant so I had to look it up. I didnāt quite mean that. I meant that a person gets to āchooseā his/her own meaning. Existentialisn would be one of the many choices out there (buddism, islamicism :? , daosim, christianity, etc.). I guess choosing to create a new and unheard of meaning is an option too.
I didnāt really read through this but it seemed intreasting enough to post [CLICK HERE]
Or if you really wanted to be cynical, you could choose Wolframism, which should become a substantial movement within a few years.