Post-civil war in Spain and Franco's dictatorship

This reminds me how, at the end of the Spanish civil war, many republican refugees went to France to help fighting the nazis in WWII, hoping that the allied front would help them free Spain the same they did with the rest of Europe. Wrong. Somewhere, someone, decided that Franco wasn’t a threat to anyone, and they allowed him to retain power for 40 years, just because she fought against “communists” inside Spain. The people and soldiers who fled had to stay in France or other EU countries, because they couldn’t get back to their homes (or else they would have been executed).

Civil wars are the cruelest.

[quote=“Blaquesmith”]This reminds me how, at the end of the Spanish civil war, many republican refugees went to France to help fighting the nazis in WWII, hoping that the allied front would help them free Spain the same they did with the rest of Europe. Wrong. Somewhere, someone, decided that Franco wasn’t a threat to anyone, and they allowed him to retain power for 40 years, just because she fought against “communists” inside Spain. The people and soldiers who fled had to stay in France or other EU countries, because they couldn’t get back to their homes (or else they would have been executed).

Civil wars are the cruelest.[/quote]

Franco was a great leader for Spain, and a hell of a lot better than the politicians under the Spanish Republic. Read some balanced books about Franco (e.g., Brian Crozier’s Franco) and you’ll see that he wasn’t a fascist at all, but co-opted Fascist elements within the Nationalist side, such as the Falange, but marginalized them in the process (sort of like what Mitterand did in France in the 1980s when he brought Commies into his Cabinet but effectively destroyed them as a political force).

During the Spanish Civil War, were Carlists fascists? Moorish brigades? Military people such as Quepo de Llano that originally backed the Republic and the overthrow of the Monarchy but later sided with Franco and the Nationalists over the Republic when it showed itself to be weak. No way. Lots of diverging views on the Nationalist side ranging from syndicalists to conservative Catholics. All with the correct viewpoint that regionalism whether Basque or Catalan in nature, should be combatted through military/political centralism while respecting the Church and the landowners/industrialists. :bravo: But fascist? No. There was simply too many diverging opinions.

Franco had little choice in receiving aid from Germany and Italy, as the Russians were providing a lot of aid to the Republican side and people such as the still-living Santiago Carillo gave the Russians all of Spain’s gold reserves. Franco annoyed the Italians and Germans by not formally joining them actively in WW2 and was the ultimate Galacian realist. He took in thousands of Jewish refugees during WW2 when countries such as Canada didn’t let any in at all. The real pussies in the Spanish Civil War were the Western powers, that took an isolationist position. Both sides were forced to make deals with the devil. Thank Christ, Franco won and Opus Dei technocrats developed Spain into a modern country.

Lots of atrocities on the Republican side too. Again, that Santiago Carillo still gets a Spanish pension and is awarded honourary degrees is complete horse shit considering his crimes:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paracuellos_massacres

If Franco was so great why did Spain have to wait until he was dead to become a modern nation?

You don’t think the Spanish miracle (Spain had some of the highest GDP growth in the world in the 1960s) was in part due to Franco’s Opus Dei technocrats? The censorship law was relaxed in 1966, again by liberal elements of the Francoist regime. Furthermore, was it not the Duke of Suarez, that led democratization after Franco’s death? Was not Juan Carlos chosen by Franco?

I’d say the modern Spain owes a lot to Franco, and today’s Spain, by taking down statues etc., has shown childish ingratitude.

ChewDawg:
Are you saying you would not have joined the Abraham Lincoln Brigade? If not the Mac-Paps?
Such disdain for the working soldiers might bring you ill repute when I buy a round at Spinnaker’s!
:smiling_imp:

[quote=“TheGingerMan”]ChewDawg:
Are you saying you would not have joined the Abraham Lincoln Brigade? If not the Mac-Paps?
Such disdain for the working soldiers might bring you ill repute when I buy a round at Spinnaker’s!
:smiling_imp:[/quote]

:laughing: :laughing: I would have relished fighting the Abraham Lincoln Brigade—as part of the Irish Brigade on the Nationalist side. :smiley: Mac-Paps? Less so.

Looking forward to that round at Spinnaker’s, which is very near to the monument for the Mac-Paps!
waymarking.com/waymarks/WM19 … _Battalion

[quote=“ChewDawg”][quote=“TheGingerMan”]ChewDawg:
Are you saying you would not have joined the Abraham Lincoln Brigade? If not the Mac-Paps?
Such disdain for the working soldiers might bring you ill repute when I buy a round at Spinnaker’s!
:smiling_imp:[/quote]

:laughing: :laughing: I would have relished fighting the Abraham Lincoln Brigade—as part of the Irish Brigade on the Nationalist side. :smiley: Mac-Paps? Less so. [/quote]
So it seems you are a Fenian at heart? Let me tell you some Kants down around Ft. Erie might recall well those fine elements 200 years ago, when the Canucks turned and ran, sorry, withdrew.
Damn officers, again!

[quote]Looking forward to that round at Spinnaker’s, which is very near to the monument for the Mac-Paps!
waymarking.com/waymarks/WM19 … _Battalion[/quote]
yeah. chew, we all know I got the first round. And you have the second, and we shall expect us all to argue about the rest. I will win, of course, as the mere mention of the word “Kennedy” will send the Chewy unto a swift and easily puntable package.
Where is that Mac-Pap monument? Close to Esquimalt!
Just you wait until I drag you unto a Pongo Bar!
Until then! :stuck_out_tongue:

Are you on crack?

Politicians of the Spanish republic were bad? Point. Franco was better? Nope. Just changed chaos for military-enforced order through fear and repression. 40 years of dictatorial repression.

Excuse me? regionalism? Catalan Parlament is the oldest in Europe, and the Bourbon troops commanded by Phillip V had to conquer Catalonia by force in 1714. Catalonia was an independent country before (hopefully, it will become independent again). Franco needed to fuel immigration from other parts of Spain to “dilute” catalan people. He knew Spain NEEDED Catalonia and Euskadi because both are the more industrial (advanced) parts of the spanish state. This still applies, and the fear they have is that, if Catalonia and Euskadi become independent, Spain will go down faster than Greece.

We agree on that. Both sides commited war crimes, though. It’s what civil wars are about, and that’s why I say that they are the cruelest wars of all.

Wrong. The nationalcatholicism perpetuated the middle age superstitions and slowed development for 40 years. I’m not saying the religion or the catholicism is bad. My mother’s family is deeply religious and I respect that, because they really believe in God and they are good people. But the official stand of the church in Spain was helping repression and indoctrination of children. I can’t support that.

[quote=“ChewDawg”]Lots of atrocities on the Republican side too. Again, that Santiago Carillo still gets a Spanish pension and is awarded honourary degrees is complete horse shit considering his crimes:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paracuellos_massacres[/quote]

Oh, I know about Paracuellos. And I’ll give you some more examples:

  • My mother’s grandfather and his two oldest sons were killed by anarchists. Abducted from home, taken to a crossroads, and killed in cold blood.
  • My mother’s uncle fled the civil war, was captured in France and deported back to Spain. He had to endure an internment camp and he was scarred for life after being set free.
  • My father’s uncle fled (when he was 16 years old) from Barcelona when Franco’s insurgent troops were near. He went to France, and was captured later by the nazis. He was sent to Mathausen and labelled “Rot Spanien” (Spanish Red). He had never been part of any communist activity, but they assumed that if he had fled, he was “one of them”. After Mathausen was liberated by the US troops, he returned to Paris. He couldn’t come to Spain to visit his family for 40 years, or Franco’s regime would have put him in prison.
  • My father’s grandfather was a local policeman in Barcelona. He had been born in Valladolid, though. When Franco captured Barcelona, he went to work as usual, because the insurgent troops had told everyone that there would be no actions against law officers. When he arrived at the police station, military police captured him and throw him into prison for being a “collaborationist”. All he had done was his job as a LOCAL police officer (and he wasn’t even on the streets, he was a social worker in the police station).

My point is, during the war, both sides did things very wrong. It was a war, and it’s assumed to happen, as it happens in ALL wars. What came after the war was a real shame, and those were the worst years in the history of Spain. Franco didn’t enter the WWII because he KNEW that he couldn’t give anything to the Axis war effort. And if he joined, the allied troops wouldn’t have stopped at the Pyrinees. I wish he had entered WWII, and that the Allied troops had made all their way up to Gibraltar.

About unbiased books, I find very interesting the books that Paul Preston has written about the spanish conflict and post-war era.

Are you on crack?

Politicians of the Spanish republic were bad? Point. Franco was better? Nope. Just changed chaos for military-enforced order through fear and repression. 40 years of dictatorial repression.

Excuse me? regionalism? Catalan Parlament is the oldest in Europe, and the Bourbon troops commanded by Phillip V had to conquer Catalonia by force in 1714. Catalonia was an independent country before (hopefully, it will become independent again). Franco needed to fuel immigration from other parts of Spain to “dilute” catalan people. He knew Spain NEEDED Catalonia and Euskadi because both are the more industrial (advanced) parts of the spanish state. This still applies, and the fear they have is that, if Catalonia and Euskadi become independent, Spain will go down faster than Greece.

We agree on that. Both sides commited war crimes, though. It’s what civil wars are about, and that’s why I say that they are the cruelest wars of all.

Wrong. The nationalcatholicism perpetuated the middle age superstitions and slowed development for 40 years. I’m not saying the religion or the catholicism is bad. My mother’s family is deeply religious and I respect that, because they really believe in God and they are good people. But the official stand of the church in Spain was helping repression and indoctrination of children. I can’t support that.

[quote=“ChewDawg”]Lots of atrocities on the Republican side too. Again, that Santiago Carillo still gets a Spanish pension and is awarded honourary degrees is complete horse shit considering his crimes:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paracuellos_massacres[/quote]

Oh, I know about Paracuellos. And I’ll give you some more examples:

  • My mother’s grandfather and his two oldest sons were killed by anarchists. Abducted from home, taken to a crossroads, and killed in cold blood.
  • My mother’s uncle fled the civil war, was captured in France and deported back to Spain. He had to endure an internment camp and he was scarred for life after being set free.
  • My father’s uncle fled (when he was 16 years old) from Barcelona when Franco’s insurgent troops were near. He went to France, and was captured later by the nazis. He was sent to Mathausen and labelled “Rot Spanien” (Spanish Red). He had never been part of any communist activity, but they assumed that if he had fled, he was “one of them”. After Mathausen was liberated by the US troops, he returned to Paris. He couldn’t come to Spain to visit his family for 40 years, or Franco’s regime would have put him in prison.
  • My father’s grandfather was a local policeman in Barcelona. He had been born in Valladolid, though. When Franco captured Barcelona, he went to work as usual, because the insurgent troops had told everyone that there would be no actions against law officers. When he arrived at the police station, military police captured him and throw him into prison for being a “collaborationist”. All he had done was his job as a LOCAL police officer (and he wasn’t even on the streets, he was a social worker in the police station).

My point is, during the war, both sides did things very wrong. It was a war, and it’s assumed to happen, as it happens in ALL wars. What came after the war was a real shame, and those were the worst years in the history of Spain. Franco didn’t enter the WWII because he KNEW that he couldn’t give anything to the Axis war effort. And if he joined, the allied troops wouldn’t have stopped at the Pyrinees. I wish he had entered WWII, and that the Allied troops had made all their way up to Gibraltar.

About unbiased books, I find very interesting the books that Paul Preston has written about the spanish conflict and post-war era.[/quote]

Great post!
Sorry about your familia, but as you yourself posit.
War is Ugly.
It affects all, bloodthirst especially.
Again it is leadership that paves the way.
A leader with weapon drawn maintaining that this is NOT how things happen in our unit. This involves force in and of itself upon victorious troopers, and it is a hard thing to manage.
How exactly does one tell one’s privates that they can’t get some?
Personally, I thank the Commonwealth.
Aussies & Kiwis & Afrikaans, on my line, I would deploy. Might be a yank or two, but they are really not one us, now are they?
It is actually surprising how far a North American voice will travel.
Hats off to the Norwegians and the Danes.
They were the best units I ever saw.

[quote=“Blaquesmith”]
Just changed chaos for military-enforced order through fear and repression. 40 years of dictatorial repression. [/quote]
I would call it stability. In the late Franco years, censorship was loosened significantly. Opponents of the regime? Often allowed to return. Franco granted a lot of amnesties/chose not to prosecute. For example, look at Republican Head General Rojo Lluch being allowed to return in 1957.

[quote]

Excuse me? regionalism? Catalan Parlament is the oldest in Europe (hopefully, it will become independent again… [/quote]
:laughing: :laughing: Such splittism/regionalism- :no-no: --exactly why Franco was correct in executing Catalan president Lluís Companys after he was caught in France. The only way for Spain to develop was through strong stable centralism that unified Spain while protecting the Church and business interests.

I would say it was the tribalism that left Spain undeveloped and that the Catholic Church was a unifying institution. When anti-clericalism was pushed by politicians and when violence against clergy was actually encouraged by the state and carried out by the rabble, as it was under the Republic, non-political military officers were forced to become political.

[quote]
My point is, during the war, both sides did things very wrong. It was a war, and it’s assumed to happen, as it happens in ALL wars. What came after the war was a real shame, and those were the worst years in the history of Spain. Franco didn’t enter the WWII because he KNEW that he couldn’t give anything to the Axis war effort. And if he joined, the allied troops wouldn’t have stopped at the Pyrinees. I wish he had entered WWII, and that the Allied troops had made all their way up to Gibraltar. [/quote]
I don’t think they were the worst years in Spain’s history. In fact, I think Spain was saved from being Bolshevized. I think Franco was the ultimate survivor/Sphinx, using the Germans/Italians to defeat the Communists, and then discarding them when he knew they were on the losing side. What I find hypocritical is that so many EU countries treated Spain as a pariah state after WW2 when their own actions during the war were pretty questionable. Again, Spain saved thousands of Jews. Did France? :unamused:

He’s an LSE academic (my alma mater). He has his biases.

Executing a person just because his political ideas are different is not correct, in ANY circumstance. Much less if that person is the elect president, and was voted by his peers.

The massive executions that Franco ordered was as wrong as the summary executions carried by the communists and the anarchists. They are on the same level. Franco was a bully that used the insurgent military to seize power, and used repression and fear to control the country.

When you have to start repressing the population, using propaganda and declaring illegal some kinds of political thought, you are wrong. It’s the same in all dictatorships. It’s the same on Cuba, it’s the same on the PRC. They discourage critical thought. They coerce freedom.

Freedom is a right, and you cannot cut people’s freedom and be legitimate.

[quote=“Blaquesmith”]

Executing a person just because his political ideas are different is not correct, in ANY circumstance. Much less if that person is the elect president, and was voted by his peers. [/quote]
I don’t disagree. But if it is a civil war and if that person is promoting succession/splittism, it’s a fair game. He’d been jailed for 30 years by the Republican government for troublemaking. In other words, I am not surprised he was one of the people to be executed by the Nationalists.

I don’t think Franco’s executions were any worse than Republican executions. However, I think if Russia had gained a foothold in Spain, the deaths would have been worse X100000000. And make no mistake about it, without Western intervention, which never came except for a few poet socialists (Abe Lincoln Brigade), the Soviets were calling the shots. Furthermore, again using Republican Spain as an example, I think “fear” was one of the reasons military officers revolted in the first place. When government anti-clericalism took the form of inaction in preventing violence against clergy, people were disgusted by the breakdown in law and order. Franco communicated with Republican politicians about the breakdown repeatedly before revolting. They did nothing. With regards to the fear and control after the war was over, I’d say that pardons were given quite generously and I point to Rojo being allowed to return as a prime example.

[quote]When you have to start repressing the population, using propaganda and declaring illegal some kinds of political thought, you are wrong. It’s the same in all dictatorships. It’s the same on Cuba, it’s the same on the PRC. They discourage critical thought. They coerce freedom.

Freedom is a right, and you cannot cut people’s freedom and be legitimate.[/quote]

I think comparing Francoist Spain to the above countries is ludicrous. Let’s give Franco credit for:
(a) preventing a Soviet controlled Spain and guaranteeing freedom of religion and property
(b) for granting right of return/pardons for many Republicans.
(c) for curtailing the power of the fascist Falange elements within his coalition and appointing technocrats that brought about the “Spanish miracle”, boosted tourism and significantly relaxed censorship.
(d) appointing Juan Carlos as king after his death.

The last two actions help bring about modern Spain, and yet the PSOE and assholes like Balthazar Garzon constantly want to bring up old wounds by outlawing statues of Franco, lead investigations into executions etc.

Franco was a murderous fascist dictator. There was nothing great about him.

Franco was a murderous fascist dictator. There was nothing great about him.[/quote]

Again, your views are simplistic in the extreme. I’ve pointed out that Nationalist forces were a coalition of different parties and that Franco co-opted disgruntled former Republicans, Carlists, Falangists etc. into a fighting force and later a political party. The only fascist party in his coalition were the Falangists. The differences between Franco and the Falangists (who revered Primo de Rivera and believed in state control of the economy) are quite distinct. Franco adopted some of their policies, but in the later years, he often sidelined them.

Your statement reminds me of regurgitated first year academic papers that should receive an F! :laughing: :smiley: :wink: It is what the professor wants to hear but it’s horse shit.

Franco didn’t bring “religious freedom”. He openpy supported catholicism, nothing else. If someone declared himself openly as an atheist, agnostic or something else, he was prosecuted.

Again, if bringing back an obsolete monarchy of thieves is going “modern”…

Guys, it’s obvious Chewie once had a wealthy well connected Spaniard as a classmate, or worked side by side with Franco’s dentist’s grandson (and everyone knows a dentist is nearly the perfect confidante in Spanish culture) and was set straight on all this stuff. He knows the truth. :thumbsup:

Franco was a murderous fascist dictator. There was nothing great about him.[/quote]
I bet he made the trains run on time.

Close family friends, who threw trash on yard and burned the gardens of their estate in Cuba to escape from Castro and move to Spain had very, very few good things to say about Franco. I remember them talking about how Franco was not much different than Castro and how easy it was to get on the wrong side of the Guardia Civil.

Franco was a murderous fascist dictator. There was nothing great about him.[/quote]
I bet he made the trains run on time.[/quote]

Are you kidding? In Spain, trains ALWAYS run late. Except for those that aren’t managed by RENFE (the national train company), which are only a few. Catalonia’s government has its trains running on time, but that’s not surprising, since they brought german engineers to manage the catalan rairoads… But RENFE’s trains run always late, even in Catalonia.

You mean like Mussolini didn’t do?