My, you’re angry. Is it envy that I was able to retire young? Or something else? Wounded moral narcissism, perhaps?
You think you’re signaling virtue, but that’s not the message you’re getting out. The revolution has left without you. You were waiting on the wrong platform. It is the fate of the self-righteously indignant to be laughed at in the end. Suck it up, bucko.
Are you now, or have you ever been, a member of the dumbass party?
Yawn,
Sounds familiar.
As usual, get back to us as soon as you have any evidence.
Thanks for finally answering my question, Comrade Smith. 
Congratulations! Make sure you get a healthy cut of the action when all those reference sources start using your post as a perfect example of “false equivalence”.
Accusing people of being Kremlin operatives without evidence is classic red baiting. Just shows how low Democrats are willing to go in their race to the bottom with Donald Trump.
“Comrade Smith” is a good example of red baiting.
Now that we’ve taken our detour to the history woodshed, where’s that evidence that the commies infiltrated the U.S. election process?
INGSOC is above color politics! 
False?
The equivalence is self evident. Its falsehood… not so much.
The point of gaslighting is to make the other person look crazy. When you try to gaslight about your own hysteria, it tends to backfire. In other words, you can’t act like like an ass and then try to gaslight your critics. That just makes everyone want to bitch slap you.
Russia influenced the election. The reasons are obvious even to dumbasses.
If they are not obvious to you and you can’t recognize the indicating facts, then what should your party be called?
https://youtu.be/cTPm_Geknmk?t=2615
Not surprised the Clinton News Network is still pushing that nonsense. I mean, afterall if you keep repeating it some people will eventually believ…oh it already happened, never mind.
Any mention of the fact that the CIA was able to conduce cyber attacks leaving fake Russian traces? No? Awkward.
Not surprised the Roland IbisWtf Network is still pushing back on what people with 40 years of pro experience have to say. .
Any mention of the fact that the Russians were able to conduce fake users and posters leaving fake pro Trump traces all over the internet? No? Awkward
Let me guess Roland is giving your post a like?
The difference is that there’s 0 evidence of Russian interference. And please note that:“An anonymous source mentioned that…an unnamed source says that…allegedly this and this…” are not sources, it’s McCarthyism 2.0.
Podesta emails and the rest of the documents released by Wikileaks are facts, you can either accept it or simply play the role of the полезные дураки. Each political party/ideology needs them to keep going.
Also, lol @ the people with 40 years of experience. What kind of logic is that? They’ve been writing news for 40 years SO OBVIOUSLY they would have NO interested in spreading false news for economical and political gain? Welcome to the real world, buddy. Have a seat.
How much do you get paid for this nonsense, seriously.
WikiLeaks are facts released by Russians at a strategically important time.
Trump selling property to a Russian making ca 300% gain about 70 million $ are facts. The list goes on and on.
The above video can not be viewed 10 minutes after posting here are facts.
The Russians wanted and saw the windows source code years ago, or they would not allow windows to be used in Russia, facts.
Russia is one of the biggest players when it comes to cyber attacks. fact.
Russians were able to break into the Taiwanese ATM machines fact.
Microsoft is giving windows ten for free to everyone with a previous windows version key, fact, why??
Russia is running big botnets, mostly windows xp pcs.
Here is one for you. Since Trump is all for legalized waterboarding.
Why not release his Tax returns, analyze them and start waterboarding this chimp till all the truth is out?
What’s obvious is that anyone still trafficking in “secret evidence” as proof of anything, particularly given the sordid record of “secret evidence” in recent years, is a dumbass.
From Don’t Be A Dumbass 101:
[quote]Proof by assertion
Proof by assertion, sometimes informally referred to as proof by repeated assertion, is an informal fallacy in which a proposition is repeatedly restated regardless of contradiction. Sometimes, this may be repeated until challenges dry up, at which point it is asserted as fact due to its not being contradicted (argumentum ad nauseam). In other cases, its repetition may be cited as evidence of its truth, in a variant of the appeal to authority or appeal to belief fallacies.
This fallacy is sometimes used as a form of rhetoric by politicians, or during a debate as a filibuster. In its extreme form, it can also be a form of brainwashing. Modern politics contains many examples of proofs by assertion. This practice can be observed in the use of political slogans, and the distribution of “talking points”, which are collections of short phrases that are issued to members of modern political parties for recitation to achieve maximum message repetition. The technique is also sometimes used in advertising.[/quote]
So, Hillary Clinton doesn’t have AIDS then. Good news for her.
How about circumstantial evidence?
How about undisclosed sources? In my opinion, this is one big pillar for maintaining a free press. The press needs to protect its sources, otherwise there won’t be any.
If your girlfriend smells the red rose at the stem, says she’s on her way home and waves the taxi into the wrong direction, isn’t available on Valentines day and on her Birthday, at what point, do you think, it’s time to break up?
How about providing evidence to support an assertion?
Otherwise call it what it is, a suspicion. Pretending that suspicions are proven facts comes across as a pathetic attempt to blame the election loss on anything, however outlandish, other than what it was: a flawed campaign by a flawed candidate with a stale, business as usual message.
The press needs to prove that the sources exist, otherwise we’ll all suspect there aren’t any, and they’re just making stuff up again.
It’s not like they’ve never been caught lying. Their credibility is in the toilet these days. That shifts the burden of proof.
Which is why this Russia conspiracy theory just isn’t going to fly. Seriously. You’re just making an ass of yourself.
I think your problem is you don’t grasp that it doesn’t matter what you say or how often you repeat it when nobody takes you seriously. Are you one of those silly types who don’t even know what evidence is?
I don’t think we’ll need to worry too much more about Russia anymore with the Democrats and media; they are starting to back off this Russia conspiracy. When Trump accused Obama of wiretapping him, he checkmated him, which is why Obama was so livid. The community organizer got outsmarted and out maneuvered.
If Trump is being investigated for Russian ties, that means Obama had started it and had been spying on a candidate of the opposing party before elections, which would be a much bigger scandal. Democrats don’t want it to go there, people will start thinking about that each time Trump is accused on “leaks,” leading the public to believe there really is an investigation, instigated by Obama.