[quote=“Rennes”]Thanks for your insight. The thing I don’t get, let’s say the CPI and upgraded with leftover cash… That will still be worse than the Suzuki though, right? I was thinking about getting a KTR when my bike budget was smaller, but since I can justify 100,000, I think KTR with better parts, is still going to be worse than the Suzuki, when all the money is spent, either way.
How much do Honda Hornet 250’s run? I thought those are cool an plenty strong for being a 250, but I was under the impression they are quite expensive.[/quote]
I’m not sure how much Honda Hornets go for these days, but they probably are not too cheap. The Hornet is a great bike, but I have heard that they are not that reliable. Parts are going to be a bit hard to find and expensive. Even though the Hornet is a 250cc, it is actually a pretty big bike compared to the Suzuki TU, CPI, or KTR. It might be harder to park, but that might not be a problem if this is just going to be a weekend warrior. The problem I had with the Hornet is that it doesn’t make power until about 8000RPMs and revs to 18,000RPMs (Over kill if you ask me.) I am an NSR guy and love that power band style on the race track, but not on the roads around Taiwan. If you want to ride it in the power band then you will always be screaming the engine around town. I did that for 4 years with my NSR. The roads here are just not that motorcycle friendly for that type of motorcycle in my opinion. I find torque to be the best option for town riding.
If really just depends what you are looking for in a motorcycle for around 100,000nt. Yes, the Suzuki will be the best engineered bike. In Theory, you should have the least amount of problems with that bike if you maintain it regularly. I don’t know much about the TU 250cc though. They are kind of rare. I would expect parts are not that cheap and maybe even a bit hard to find….but I really don’t know. Even used ones are pretty expensive. I am sure a stock one would be a wonderful ride, but I would still want to change a few things on it like brakes and tires right away and maybe even the suspension later.
If you compare the TU to the CPI, then I’ll bet the CPI will be faster stock. The TU weighs about 130kg and has 20 engine hp. The CPI weighs 107kg and has 24 engine hp. This is according to the Internet. The TU is going to be more comfy, but I would say that the CPI would probably be more fun to ride. I too was looking into the TU, but the CPI sold me because I wanted to learn a different riding style. I am also a big racetrack rider and I new that the TU or even the KTR would never see any track time. Those bikes were really not made for it. People would argue that the CPI wasn’t either, but I have made it work. I wanted to learn how to ride like the big cc super motard guys were riding with their foot out. I have already mastered the knee down/lean. So it was time for something new.
The KTR is an outstanding bike for what it is. It will be slow, but comfy and probably pretty reliable. It might be slow, but you could make it stop and handle well and save the most amount of money. It all depends on what you want in a motorcycle. The TU will be the most expensive and probably have the best reliability. It will be fun and have some low end power, but could also be a little boring to ride. The CPI will be the most fun IMO, but might have some reliability issues (I said might.) The KTR would be the cheapest option, reliable, but a little boring too with not much power.
You should get out there and test ride some of these bikes. I would also test ride a SYM T2 250cc just to see what the power is like. This bike goes for about 130,000nt new right now.