Original Title: “do people with US passports have a right to try to influence”
I do not believe people (Taiwanese or non-Taiwanese) have a right to try to influence the political situation in Taiwan if they have a foreign passport(one exception down a ways). They should not try to change public opinion in Taiwan and they should not try to protest to the government. People who want to change the political climate of Taiwan should so this through communicating with the government of their non-Taiwan passport. So, if you have a Swedish passport and you do not like the human rights situation in Taiwan, you complain to the Swedish government and the Swedish government can use such tools as trade sanctions to influence Taiwan. Why do I feel this way? Because if you successfully advocate something that down the road has very dangerous consequences, you can just skip on the nearest airplane out of Taiwan while the people who only have Taiwan citizenship are left with the consequences. I know that probably most government officials have more than one passport, but what I’m saying especially applies to them. One exception to what I am saying is the good work that Mr. Hartzell is doing on behalf of foreigners in Taiwan. I am an American citizen and I used to be involved in the environmental movement in Taiwan via the DPP’s Environmental Protection Union. I contributed to a bilingual newsletter on Taiwan’s environement. Although I believe what I had to say criticizing KMT enterprises such as China Petroleum Corporation was correct, later after some relfection (especially in light of the Tian an men incident in which many foreign journalists and foreigners in general in Beijing at the time encouraged the student protest), I came to the conclusion that if I wanted to influence environmental protection in Taiwan, I should do it by, say, protesting the sale of nuclear reactors by Westinghouse to Taiwan and making my feelings known to US Senators. Any thoughts?-v