Freud would have a field day with this study
[quote=âHealthDay Newsâ]
Researchers have uncovered another damaging consequence of spanking: risky sexual behaviors, or even sexual deviancy, when the child grows up.
The review being presented at the meeting are the first to look at the relationship of spanking to sexual behavior.
They found that spanking and other corporal punishment is associated with an increased probability of verbally and physically coercing a dating partner to have sex; risky sex such as premarital sex without using a condom; and masochistic sex such as spanking during sex.
There is a âdose responseâ at work here. âThe more parents spank, the higher the probability of harmful side effects,â Straus noted.
Of course, thereâs a similar dose response for smokers. But if someone reaches the age of 65 without developing lung cancer, it doesnât mean that smoking isnât harmful. It means the person was one of the lucky ones.
Itâs the same with spanking, Straus said. âIf a person says, 'I was spanked, and I donât have any interest in bondage and discipline sex, thatâs correct, but itâs not because spanking is OK, itâs because theyâre one of the lucky ones.â
And spanking a child once may be like picking up that first cigarette. âThe trouble is, if you have a 2-year-old, you pretty soon decide you canât avoid it. The recidivism rate for whatever âcrimeâ you correct a 2-year-old for is about 50 percent in two hours.â
âIâve been researching corporal punishment for 30 years and, in the course of that time, the evidence has accumulated that it doesnât work any better than non-corporal punishment but has harmful side effects. I have come to the conclusion that parents should never, ever spank because, although it does work, itâs no better than non-hitting methods that donât have harmful side effects. If there was an FDA for spanking, theyâd say use an alternative that doesnât have harmful side effects.â[/quote]