Tariffs, trade war

“if China threatens our sovereignty, we will act to protect our country.”
- Pres. Joe Biden SOTU Address Feb 7, 2023

Notable comment from the President directly addressing China. Also indicating that the Chinese Spy Balloon incident was deemed a threat to US sovereignty.

On the China threat, the Democrats and Republicans are well aligned.

Biden has built on former President Donald Trump’s hostile turn against Beijing, which was turbocharged by the outbreak of a global pandemic that originated in China, and has drawn up broad new laws and policies challenging China’s influence. In another sign of unified opposition to China, House Speaker Kevin McCarthy has convened a new bipartisan House committee dedicated to examining the perceived threat from the Chinese Communist Party.

https://edition.cnn.com/2023/02/08/politics/china-biden-state-of-the-union/index.html

  • Taiwan exports contract for fifth straight month, tumbling 21 per cent in January amid weak demand in China, US

  • Exporters on [Taiwan] shipped US$31.51 billion worth of goods last month, down a steep 21.2 per cent over January last year

  • Shipments to mainland China and Hong Kong fell 33.5 per cent, while exports to the US dropped by 14.5 per cent in the first month of 2023

Evidence of US strategy working, at least at the moment.

https://twitter.com/potus/status/1624408763565240322?s=46&t=b7gE54A_vusBtD4E6E_qvg

Biden Administration is doubling down on Trump’s policies — this is a major surprise for China considering they were expecting a U-turn as soon as the new president was in office — instead China has been faced with increasing pressure from all sides.

Now the US is boldly stating “the Supply Chain begins in America”.

Japanese subsidies to exit China are working:

Vietnam’s increasingly vital role in supply chains is bringing greater electronics investment from Japan as well as more awareness of human rights issues, according to the Japan External Trade Organization.

Manufacturers have invested in advanced devices and other sectors in Vietnam due in part to Japanese government subsidies to exit China and also to diversify production across Southeast Asia, said Matsumoto Nobuyuki, JETRO’s chief representative, in an interview with Nikkei Asia.

US facing showdown with China and Russia…

https://edition.cnn.com/2023/02/14/politics/us-china-russia-showdown/index.html

Wang Yi to visit Russia as tensions mount…
https://edition.cnn.com/2023/02/14/china/wang-yi-russia-diplomatic-tour-munich-blinken-intl-hnk/index.html

US warns China

https://edition.cnn.com/2023/02/18/politics/us-warns-allies-china-russia/index.html

Chinese drones supporting Russian war effort.

Some of the commercial drones are arriving on the front lines from Russian distributors supplied by Shenzhen, China-based Da-Jiang Innovations Science & Technology Co., known as DJI, according to customs records, while others are transported through the United Arab Emirates.

DJI ban incoming…

Blinken-Wang talks in Munich worsens US-China tensions…

Russia circumventing export controls via China. Most of the semiconductors Russia needs are less advanced, and China makes plenty of those at the moment.

Goods appear to be finding their way to Russia, just through a longer route. Exports from European countries to countries like Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan have exploded, as have exports from those countries to Russia, according to Matthew Klein, an economics writer who is tracking trends in trade volumes. Both this data, and Russian tax collections, suggest that the country’s overall imports have essentially recovered to pre-war levels, he said.

In particular, the United States and its allies appear to have had limited success in stopping the trade of so-called dual-use technologies that can be used in both military equipment and consumer goods.

In December, Russia’s imports of chips had recovered to more than two-thirds of their value last February, just before the war began, according to Silverado. China and Hong Kong, in particular, together accounted for nearly 90 percent of global chip exports to Russia by value from March to December.

Shipments from China to Russia of smart cards, light-emitting diodes, polysilicon, semiconductor manufacturing equipment and other goods have also risen, the firm said.

“While we are concerned about Russia’s deepening ties with them, Beijing cannot give the Kremlin what it does not have, because China does not produce the advanced semiconductors Russia needs,” Mr. Adeyemo said during his remarks. “And nearly 40 percent of the less advanced microchips Russia is receiving from China are defective.”

But Ivan Kanapathy, a former China director for the National Security Council, said that most of what Russia needed for its weapons were less advanced chips, which are manufactured in plenty in China.

“The U.S. government is very well aware that our export control system is designed in a way that really relies on a cooperative host government, which we don’t have in this case,” Mr. Kanapathy said.

He added that it was “quite easy” for parties to circumvent export control through the use of front companies, or by altering the names and addresses of entities. “China is quite adept at that.”

https://edition.cnn.com/2023/02/22/economy/china-russia-economic-ties-ukraine-intl-hnk/index.html

“China has supported Russia’s war economically in the sense that it has ramped up trade with Russia, which has weakened Western efforts to cripple Moscow’s military machine,” said Neil Thomas, senior analyst for China and Northeast Asia at Eurasia Group.

“Xi Jinping wants to deepen China’s relationship with an increasingly isolated Russia,” he said, adding that Moscow’s “pariah status” enables Beijing to exert more leverage on it to obtain cheap energy, advanced military technology and diplomatic support for China’s international interests.

Total trade between China and Russia hit a new record high in 2022, up 30% to $190 billion, according to Chinese customs figures. In particular, the energy trade has risen markedly since the onset of the war.

China bought $50.6 billion worth of crude oil from Russia from March to December, up 45% from the same period the previous year. Coal imports surged 54% to $10 billion. Natural gas purchases including pipeline gas and LNG, skyrocketed 155% to $9.6 billion.

Chinese car brands, including Havel, Chery, and Geely, have seen their market share surge from 10% to 38% in a year following the exit of Western brands, according to most recent data from Russian research firm Autostat. And that share is likely to grow further this year, it has forecast.

In consumer electronics, Chinese brands accounted for about 40% of the smartphone market at the end of 2021. A year later, they’ve virtually taken over the industry with 95% market share, according to market research firm Counterpoint.

“Of all foreign currencies that the Russian [central] bank had its reserves in, it is only Chinese yuan that was not frozen and remains a ‘friendly’ one,” said Kireeva.

“We are likely to see further de-dollarization of Russia’s foreign trade in general and [an] increasing share of trade in national currencies with all states that are friendly or neutral to Moscow.”

With more yuan reserves, Moscow is able to use the Chinese currency to stabilize the ruble and its financial markets. The ruble has plunged by more than 40% against the euro and the dollar in the past year, and the main Russian stock index has fallen by more than a third.

https://asia.nikkei.com/Economy/Trade/Hong-Kong-exports-post-biggest-plunge-in-70-years

Hong Kong’s total exports value dropped 36.7% from a year ago, the biggest percentage drop since records began in 1953, government data showed on Monday, amid a weaker external environment and the early arrival of the Lunar New Year holiday.

Total exports stood at 290.9 billion Hong Kong dollars ($37.07 billion) in January, compared with HK$459.5 billion at the same time last year and the lowest since February 2020’s HK$238.6 billion.

Hong Kong’s economy is expected to grow 3.5% to 5.5% this year after shrinking 3.5% in 2022, as it leaves behind COVID-19 restrictions that had isolated the city.

“The collapse of Hong Kong’s trade reflects the weak global demand due to high interest rates and the downturn in tech cycle,” said Gary Ng, senior economist at Natixis Corporate and Investment Bank.

“Despite the cyclical rebound in China’s reopening, the pressure will persist through supply chains in the first half of 2023,” Ng added.

China fucked that city up bad.

1 Like

China warns US risks “catastrophe”

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/china-warns-us-risks-catastrophe-042824092.html

“The US Indo-Pacific strategy, while purportedly aims at upholding freedom and openness, maintaining security and promoting prosperity in the region, is in fact an attempt to gang up to form exclusive blocs to provoke confrontation by plotting an Asia pacific version of NATO,”

Wow they really got some “Top Minds” working at the CCP :rofl:. Did he just now figure this out? Establishing an Asian NATO has long been in the cards, specifically due to the China threat.

“Self-Reliance” …AKA… “Decoupling”

Export controls on Advanced Semiconductor Technology to China are hitting the Chinese tech industry very hard.

More to come…

An economic response toward China will be a leading agenda item for the Group of Seven major economies this year, Michael Beeman, who served as assistant U.S. trade representative for Japan, South Korea and APEC affairs until January, told Nikkei.

The U.S. is urging European nations and Japan to align with export restrictions of advanced semiconductors.

“Frankly, unless there is some progress from the Chinese side in addressing U.S. concerns, it is difficult to see any significant change in tariff policy,” he said.

Chinese investors have been scrambling to buy companies that are able, or have the potential, to produce photoresist
Tokyo has yet to make a decision on restricting photoresist sales to China but some investors are already positioning for this outcome

If you thought the rate hikes would pause, you’re not paying attention to the blistering trade war.

The US is absolutely determined to crash demand on Chinese goods, specifically Tech.

China should tap out now, if they’re smart. No demand and no technology is a death blow to the CCP.

Should have never happened to begin with, but I understand why they did it.

Ending PNTR with China should have bipartisan support now.

Background for those just joining – Pre-Covid, the US strategy for China was called “Engagement”. Through engaging China and bringing them into the fold of a rules based system of trade, checks, and balances - it would allow China to enter the community with mutual benefits while transitioning to a more open form of government. This is why we let China into the WTO, established PNTR, and cooperated in many areas in the hopes that the US could avoid facing down a Nuclear power in a future war.

This failed obviously.

Now the US strategy for China is called “Containment”. And with that we need to decouple our economies, trade, stop PNTR, kick them out of the WTO, and other areas of cooperation to suppress Chinese aggression throughout the world – especially now that China has made formal threats to the world. The US of course cannot approach this alone, and so will need to engage with Alliances - and even make new ones – in order to counter/contain China.

By influencing the environment around China, the Allied nations can hopefully create the conditions necessary for China to de-escalate their aggressive behavior throughout the world.

China has already engaged in targeted reduction of key exports. More recently China has been dramatically reducing Aluminum production, where we can expect to see costs soar dramatically with huge impact on everything from tech to canned food and drinks. Serious problems in the near future.

With that said, its not a stretch to imagine China completely cutting off other supplies on a case by case basis. It will be even worse if China believes a full shutdown in exports is their best option.

Its a shame Taiwanese firms have not taken enough necessary steps to de-risk. Its almost as if they have not even considered looking elsewhere – and the clock is ticking.

Demand on Chinese goods continues to drop. China was hopeful that domestic demand could assuage the lack of foreign demand — so far internal rebound has yet to happen and “Dual Circulation Economy” is still a figment of the imagination for China.

This falls in line with what we should expect with Trade Tariffs and Fed Rate Hikes, as well as other tools, driving down consumer demand on Chinese goods — specifically Chinese made Tech sector.

To summarize what has been happening - China pivoted to an aggressive approach of constraining supplies on critical items that the West relies on, and driving up prices, through various means such as Covid lockdowns, power shutdowns, port shut downs, and artificial labor shortages.

The US countered Chinese drop in supply by suppressing the Western economy, driving down consumer demand dramatically through use of Fed Rate hikes and other inflationary measures. To force-multiply the effect on China, the US has performed these measures in lockstep with Allies around the world.

Expect inflationary measures and suppressed demand to continue until Chinese government makes meaningful changes in its stance.

The only reason we haven’t seen a total separation thus far is to preserve an off-ramp for deescalation.

Reducing reliance on China reduces business risk:

Part of the reason for the Trade War was to get businesses to do just that - diversify away from China - but many Taiwanese firms have been too slow on this issue, and many US companies have only recently started to get the ball rolling.

This also puts into perspective how massive the problem is and that it takes years and maybe decades to completely untie the knots in the supply chain.

If China makes any advances militarily in the near term, the West will be caught with their pants down so to speak - it would have catastrophic economic consequences for the world.

Collection of various recent news stories:
More US vs China War Gaming
Japanese PM nearly attacked at speech
Russia rolls out Digital Conscription
Fox News pays 700 million + fine in Dominion case
60 Minutes releases bizarre J6 interview with Ray Epps
Tucker Carlson is out from Fox News
Bongino is out from Fox News
CEO MSNBC Resigns
Don Lemon is out from CNN
Story that Blinken requested signatures to deflect Hunter Biden laptop story
Russian spy ships detected near the UK — with speculation that Russia might be planning to expand the war beyond Ukraine
North Korea launches a satellite and Japan prepared to fire it down
US evacuates 200 from Sudan
US increases cash bonuses to incentivize military recruitment
Policy Advisor Susan Rice is out from the White House
Buzz Feed News is shutting down
Vice News might be closing

Major Economic Speech planned for Thursday by the National Security Advisor - speculation relating to the Global Economy, China, and Semiconductors

“If China invaded Taiwan it would destroy world trade”

“Freight Recession” - China trade decline continues…

Ocean freight orders are down 50% year over year and it is impacting both rail and road transportation, which a trucking executive recently called a “freight recession.”

https://www.cnbc.com/2023/04/24/economy-is-in-a-freight-recession-with-china-trade-heading-lower.html

Supply Chain shift accelerating:

Unprecedented rules limiting American investments in China are expected later this month — and the administration has begun briefing industry groups like the Chamber of Commerce on the broad outlines of the executive order, which is expected to require companies to notify the government of new investments in Chinese tech firms and prohibit some deals in critical sectors like microchips.

We can see a continued drop in demand of Chinese made goods.

The US strategy of reducing demand on China and diversifying the supply chain is working. This puts into perspective why the US and Allies embarked on inflation producing policies followed by even more inflationary measures by the Fed and respective banks around the world. The goal is to get consumers to spend less on Chinese imports, and more in other areas. It’s a massive “spending migration”.

Chinese strategy of constraining supply, artificial labor shortages, power cuts, port shutdowns, factory shutdowns under the guise of Covid containment, etc are having less and less impact because the US is successfully countering with less reliance.

The issue that lies ahead is that China has painted itself into a corner… what will China do as US and Allies continue to trend of decoupling? Can Chinese Dual Circulation strategy keep the country afloat — is the Axis Russian consumer enough to supplement worldwide demand from Allied Nations? Maybe not - I suspect tougher times are ahead for the Chinese.