[quote=“Edgar Allen”]Has it occurred to any of you MORONS that BA can fire his gun wildly into a crowd and miss everyone? He has never killed somuch as an ant. Tarka on the other hand (or Tarks as we call him down the nags head) routinely kills stuff and then eats it.
Tarks’ll win it hands down boys…tch…fool indeed.[/quote]
EXACTLY! AND as previously stated, it’s no weapons allowed. AND ALSO, the A-Team aren’t allowed to kill anyone.
Oh crap, I voted for BA.
[quote=“irishstu”][quote=“Edgar Allen”]Has it occurred to any of you MORONS that BA can fire his gun wildly into a crowd and miss everyone? He has never killed somuch as an ant. Tarka on the other hand (or Tarks as we call him down the nags head) routinely kills stuff and then eats it.
Tarks’ll win it hands down boys…tch…fool indeed.[/quote]
EXACTLY! AND as previously stated, it’s no weapons allowed. AND ALSO, the A-Team aren’t allowed to kill anyone.
Oh crap, I voted for BA.[/quote]
Thanks for the explanationo, Edgar Allen.
In that case, I vote for the seal.
[quote=“914”][quote=“irishstu”][quote=“Edgar Allen”]Has it occurred to any of you MORONS that BA can fire his gun wildly into a crowd and miss everyone? He has never killed somuch as an ant. Tarka on the other hand (or Tarks as we call him down the nags head) routinely kills stuff and then eats it.
Tarks’ll win it hands down boys…tch…fool indeed.[/quote]
EXACTLY! AND as previously stated, it’s no weapons allowed. AND ALSO, the A-Team aren’t allowed to kill anyone.
Oh crap, I voted for BA.[/quote]
Thanks for the explanationo, Edgar Allen.
In that case, I vote for the seal.[/quote]
The seal would win of course, except he’s not in the fight.
[quote=“sandman”][quote=“914”][quote=“irishstu”][quote=“Edgar Allen”]Has it occurred to any of you MORONS that BA can fire his gun wildly into a crowd and miss everyone? He has never killed somuch as an ant. Tarka on the other hand (or Tarks as we call him down the nags head) routinely kills stuff and then eats it.
Tarks’ll win it hands down boys…tch…fool indeed.[/quote]
EXACTLY! AND as previously stated, it’s no weapons allowed. AND ALSO, the A-Team aren’t allowed to kill anyone.
Oh crap, I voted for BA.[/quote]
Thanks for the explanationo, Edgar Allen.
In that case, I vote for the seal.[/quote]
The seal would win of course, except he’s not in the fight.[/quote]
Oops, I meant OTTER! It’s like Scot and Irish, can’t tell em apart, they both drink and tawk funny.
Stuey, Tarka the Otter
verses
B.A.Baracus. I don’t recall the B. A. Baracus verses in the Bible. Am I wrong?
“Seal” the singer?
Never bet against an otter. Think how large the otterman empire was. Ottermen are hard, harder than army runaway wussies like Bony Ankles Barracas. Tarka the otterman is a mean muther. It wouldn’t last more than a few rounds.
[quote=“TomHill”]Never bet against an otter. Think how large the otterman empire was. Ottermen are hard, harder than army runaway wussies like Bony Ankles Barracas. Tarka the otterman is a mean muther. It wouldn’t last more than a few rounds.[/quote]If they’re like the molemen, only Superman could defeat them.
You’re all forgetting that BA once saved Hulk Hogan’s life— or the other way around. That definitely has to give BA the edge.
And don’t forget, BA is the equivalent of 1/4 MacGuyver, who in a recent thread here, was compared and/or contrasted to Chuck Norris.
I’m sorry, but 1/4 a comparison/contrast to Chuck Norris + a passing relation to the Hulkster beats anything short of MacGuyver actually using a piece of lint, a pack of Skittles, and a lawn mower engine to splice himself, Chuck, and Hogan into one being.
B.A. Baracus wins.
So is it settled then?
I have an idea. BA doesn’t get a lot of work these days. I know Tarka is dead bt we could probably find a stand in otter. What do you say we write to BA’s agent and see if he is up for it? If we did it in Taiwan there’s probably no animal rights or anything to worry about, and we’ll make sure there’s some water to give the otter a fighting chance.
Tarka’s DEAD??
The book of tarka the Otter was published originally in 1972 making him a year younger than me. I am not sure whether Otters generally live this long but there is a clue in the title of this book: -
Of course if he wasn’t dead he would be considerably younger than BA, who’s alter ego Mr T was born in 1952, making him a sprightly 54 years old. I reckon the 34 yr old would win that one!
I also discovered that Tarka is a heart treatment drug and thus in massive doses would fuck BA up pretty badly.
Anyone still think the old man BA could take on Tarka?
It was published in 1927, Edgar. Making him two years older than you. Get your facts straight.
Thread’s dead, baby.
I didn’t realise Tarka’s dead. BA would almost definitely win now. It certainly wouldn’t be a fair fight (unless they had to board aer-o-planes).
Stay tuned for the next famous person/animal match-up.
Hang on, thebook was about the film actor right? The real Tarka could still be alive and well!
Right enough! Anyone know his real name (stage name would do, I suppose)? Could we look him up on IMDB. Wait… I’ll do it now…
Good news! Tarka the Otter was played by a fella called “Spade (II)”.
No details about where he is now though.
Ah sorry I already new that. Did lots of research before casting my vote you see.
I still reckon the 52 yr old Mr T would lose if only because he would refuse to fly to a neutral territory and thus would forfeit the match.
Did you see THIS though?
newotterstories.mysite.wanadoo-members.co.uk/
Yes! Love the bit where he says he was chased by the dogs wearing the Otters clothes…fetishist obviously
You seen the Tarka trail?
tarka-country.co.uk/tarkapro … infra.html
It’s a ONE HUNDRED AND EIGHTY MILE trail. That otter is a mean mutha. B.A. would be dead with that kind of exercise regimen.