Conspiracy stories attract readers, viewers and listeners. They are also fodder for political attacks. The Epstein case has generated more than its share of such theories, and there is nothing more annoying to gossip mongers than when stubborn facts (or the absence of facts) get in the way of a juicy theory. Sorry to disappoint you, but there is really nothing much to see here, beyond what has already been disclosed. The Inside Scoop on Jeffrey Epstein - WSJ
Lol let me introduce you…hyperlink above is Dershowitz’s op-ed for WSJ
That just proves the point. You reached a conclusion first, then found authorities who agree with you. That’s not analysis, that’s confirmation bias. And no, your view doesn’t gain extra weight just because some “academics” share it. Appeals to authority don’t override definitions, intent, or context. Personal assessments aren’t disqualified just because they’re independent, that’s literally how thinking works. I could just as easily do what you’re doing and cite academics who disagree. For e…
Another poster – seemingly smitten – echoing Dershowitz. How quaint.