The Clinton years - a parade of fake scandals

(…that, with the help of illegally switching prosecuting attorneys, finally turned into a real one…)

[quote]For a long time, basically from 9/11 until the last remnants of President Bush’s credibility drowned in New Orleans, the Bush administration was able to go big on its deceptions. Most people found it inconceivable that an American president would, for example, assert without evidence that Saddam and Al Qaeda were allies. Mr. Bush won the 2004 election because a quorum of voters still couldn’t believe he would grossly mislead them on matters of national security.

Before 9/11, however, the right-wing noise machine mainly relied on little lies. And now it has returned to its roots.

[b]The Clinton years were a parade of fake scandals: Whitewater, Troopergate, Travelgate, Filegate, Christmas-card-gate. At the end, there were false claims that Clinton staff members trashed the White House on their way out.

Each pseudoscandal got headlines, air time and finger-wagging from the talking heads. The eventual discovery in each case that there was no there there, if reported at all, received far less attention. The effect was to make an administration that was, in fact, pretty honest and well run — especially compared with its successor — seem mired in scandal.[/b]
[/quote]

Sweet Little Lies

Gee…isn’t this news timely…

[quote]Bill Clinton Asked His Staffers to Investigate – Him!
By E&P Staff, Published: April 07, 2007 11:20 AM ET

NEW YORK An article by Marc Ambinder in the forthcoming May issue of The Atlantic (not yet available online) explores what he calls one of the “the juicier subplots of the 2008 presidential campaign” – the role to be played by former President Bill Clinton will play.

Ambinder reveals that at Clinton’s urging “researchers at his presidential library and his offices in Harlem embarked on a highly secretive two-year project: investigating their own boss.

“The team conducted a painstaking reexamination of all the well-worn issues from Clinton’s presidency, poring over trial transcripts, internal White House documents, notes, and public and private correspondence, searching for any overlooked information that could be used to give new life to old embarrassments. Perhaps more important, the researchers covered Clinton’s postpresidential history too, with a muckraker’s eye, including the rumors about his private life that inevitably trail him.

“All but a handful of Clinton’s staff and friends were kept in the dark about the vetting process, though two who did know about it confirmed its existence to me. Neither would describe how the results were disseminated or who has access to them now. But the purpose of the exercise is clear enough: Bill Clinton wants to know what everybody else could know about Bill Clinton. Knowing that, we can safely conclude this, too: Bill Clinton hopes to play a major role in his wife’s campaign.”

Ambinder doesn’t know exactly what the researchers found and speculates that Hillary faces the tough choice of embracing the “two-for-one pitch” or the “seen but not heard” idea. He reveals: “No one close to the Clintons has any doubt that Bill, for a host of reasons, will comply with his wife’s wishes, whatever they may be.”

But he concludes: “Perhaps more telling than Bill Clinton’s self- investigation is a subsidiary detail: He also asked his staffers to compile an exhaustive list of his achievements, which must be about as close to the creation of a résumé as ex-presidents get, and betrays a longing to return to the presidential campaign trail that Al Gore overcautiously denied him.”
editor & Publisher[/quote]

America’s Fun Couple: The Clintons

[i]"Bill Clinton Assigned Staff To Investigate Himself?

This (subscription-only) story in The Atlantic by the Hotline’s Marc Ambinder illustrates the surreal world of the Clinton marriage…

That’s why, at [Bill Clinton's] prompting, researchers at his presidential library and his offices in Harlem embarked on a highly secretive two-year project: investigating their own boss.

The team conducted a painstaking reexamination of all the well-worn issues from Clinton’s presidency, poring over trial transcripts, internal White House documents, notes, and public and private correspondence, searching for any overlooked information that could be used to give new life to old embarrassments. Perhaps more important, the researchers covered Clinton’s postpresidential history too, with a muckraker’s eye, including the rumors about his private life that inevitably trail him.

All but a handful of Clinton’s staff and friends were kept in the dark about the vetting process, though two who did know about it confirmed its existence to me. Neither would describe how the results were disseminated or who has access to them now. But the purpose of the exercise is clear enough: Bill Clinton wants to know what everybody else could know about Bill Clinton.

Well, that’s… normal.

“Do me a favor, will ya? Investigate who I’ve been seen with. I can never remember.”

Now, here’s the question that this report leaves unanswered… has Senator Clinton seen the completed report?"[/i]
The Hilary! Spot

Sorry, TC, but this makes perfect sense to me. If you consider all the friickin NON-ISSUES that Gingrich, Limbaugh and Co. were somehow able to make into psuedo-issues – at least in the eyes of the press – I can certainly understand why the man’s going to want to know what else those scumbags will be able to dig up and use against his wife.

After all, all they have to do is assert. The fact that in the end nothing will come of it makes no difference at all. Do people remember that there were 3 investigations into the Vince Foster thing - all of which came to the same conclusion: suicide??? No. They remember that dark and vaguely icky suspicion that maybe the Clintons had somehow had him done in.

Heck, in spite of the evidence utterly disappearing (by order of the British government, I might add), I STILL believe that Bush ordered hits on Al Jazeera journalists! Can’t really blame anyone else for still thinking that the Clinton presidency, which as the article points out was basically honest and well-run, had actually been “mired in scandal”, thanks to the principle, oft-heard on this forum, that if you repeat a lie often enough, it becomes generally accepted as truth – particularly when you’ve got a whole news outfit working to that purpose.

Apologies for the run-on sentence.

I recall that ridiculous trail of death that was supposedly following in Clinton’s wake – claiming every plane accident and heart attack in the nation on a man who, as a politician, has a much wider scope of acquaintances than the average person. The people who put that together probably also suspect that there is a conspiracy afoot to kill off each who succeeds in being acclaimed as the current “world oldest living person”.